The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on October 23, 2010, 09:57:18 AM
-
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Oct-23-10 10:52 AM
Original message
Here is part of a conversation about Grayson I had with a R.W.er
Do you mean the Alan Grayson that is featured on mycongressmanisnuts.com: "appears Alan Grayson's recent self indulgent behavior has paralyzed his ability to serve as an advocate for the citizens of Central Florida. By asking Attorney General Eric Holder to fine and imprison Angie Langley for exercising her first amendment right to free political speech, Alan Grayson has sunk to an extremely alarming and potentially dangerous new low. It is clear that this man has no business representing the good people of Central Florida...to attempt to use the law enforcement arm of the federal government to silence his critics is proof positive that Alan Grayson is not only unfit for office, but that his behavior and approach is totally and utterly nuts"? Imagine those right-wingers attacking a champion of free speech like Grayson?
How should I answer him?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9373500
For such intelligent people they ask for a lot of help debating those evil freepers. :lmao:
-
Here Sarge, try this -
"Well, I must admit you're right, it was a blatant violation of his oath and fundamental duty as a Congressman. He really shouldn't have done that, but it's on record, so he needs to man up and pay the price. Resignation would be more dignified than the pointless spectacle of trying to impeach someone who is otherwise only going to be in office until January, I suppose. I have to say he is also one ugly, upleasant cocksucker to boot."
No charge, I simply enjoy being helpful.
:cheersmate:
-
If you are a progressive talk show host, I would think it would behoove you to know all the facts about a candidate before you start endorsing him, lest your integrity is questioned. But that's just me. What do I know?
-
If you are a progressive talk show host, I would think it would behoove you to know all the facts about a candidate before you start endorsing him, lest your integrity is questioned. But that's just me. What do I know?
I don't believe they have much to worry about. When you have a small audience of a handful of moonbats you can endorse nutjobs like grayson. :-)
-
If you are a progressive talk show host, I would think it would behoove you to know all the facts about a candidate before you start endorsing him, lest your integrity is questioned. But that's just me. What do I know?
^5
KC
-
Damn the facts.....full talking points ahead.
-
SargeUNN Sat Oct-23-10 10:52 AM
Original message
Here is part of a conversation about Grayson I had with a R.W.er
Do you mean the Alan Grayson that is featured on mycongressmanisnuts.com: "appears Alan Grayson's recent self indulgent behavior has paralyzed his ability to serve as an advocate for the citizens of Central Florida. By asking Attorney General Eric Holder to fine and imprison Angie Langley for exercising her first amendment right to free political speech, Alan Grayson has sunk to an extremely alarming and potentially dangerous new low. It is clear that this man has no business representing the good people of Central Florida...to attempt to use the law enforcement arm of the federal government to silence his critics is proof positive that Alan Grayson is not only unfit for office, but that his behavior and approach is totally and utterly nuts"? Imagine those right-wingers attacking a champion of free speech like Grayson?
How should I answer him?
Just make shit up, like you always do. DUH! :thatsright:
-
Just make shit up, like you always do. DUH! :thatsright:
He needs help from the other MENSA (Meat heads Entertaining Normal Sane Americans) members at the DUmp to make up something.
-
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Sat Oct-23-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why bother.. he's a RW'r and won't convert... Get those that are convertable.
Translation=The Conservative is right about Grayson.
-
Here is some genius advice that Sarge got:
MedicalAdmin (461 posts) Sat Oct-23-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Step 1 - verify that Grayson actually did that.
Baggers r notorious for making shit up. If it isn't true or not entirely true then don't answer with a long well thought out defense . Simply say that you would agree with him if it were true, but it's not.
Make el baggo prove a negative. Don't fall for that old debate trick.
To which he answered:
SargeUNN (1000+ posts) Sat Oct-23-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't have that luxury because
I did Progressive Talk radio and was the first Progressive talk show host to air regularly on terrestial radio in Mississippi so my ignoring those who engage me in conversation is not a good idea. It would only give them something to point to, as I have done with Neil Bortz and J.D. Hayworth, as not being able to debate on topics. While your advice might be good for some it certainly would just be more for this guy to point to in proving that Progressives are a bunch of losers.
:lmao: :rotf:
Ya got that right! The only advice this guy got over there was "Teabaggers are crazy!" Not really a salient argument.
-
If you are a progressive talk show host, I would think it would behoove you to know all the facts about a candidate before you start endorsing him, lest your integrity is questioned. But that's just me. What do I know?
You're a conservative and you come prepared. As do most of us. DUmmies go by the seat of their pants. And it shows in their lives. :evillaugh: