The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: cavegal on October 11, 2010, 01:20:38 PM

Title: CONFIRMED: Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Take Baby
Post by: cavegal on October 11, 2010, 01:20:38 PM

http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2010/10/11/confirmed-court-did-rely-on-oath-keeper-association-to-take-baby/

Quote

To clear that up, below you will find an embedded PDF which contains the full (though redacted) versions of the following documents:  the two Petitions (one pertaining to each parent), the Court’s Ex Parte Order, the  Affidavit of Dana Bickford which was attached, the Motion for Change of Venue, and lastly, t

I did a search for "oath keepers" did not find a previous story for this.

Title: Re: CONFIRMED: Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Take Baby
Post by: mamacags on October 11, 2010, 03:23:55 PM

I read the article this morning on Drudge.  If a child is healthy, not in danger, and cared for then CPS has no reason to remove them.  I could see if you were a card carrying member of NAMBLA but Oath Keepers?  NOT A FREAKING CHANCE!

Title: Re: CONFIRMED: Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Take Baby
Post by: JohnnyReb on October 11, 2010, 03:50:45 PM

What are the odds that Ms Dana Bickford is an Obama moonbat?

Title: Re: CONFIRMED: Court Did Rely on Oath Keeper Association to Take Baby
Post by: formerlurker on October 11, 2010, 03:57:34 PM

Quote

We have posted these documents with the permission of both parents, but we redacted (blacked out) all the personal information and allegations that do not pertain to Oath Keepers or gun ownership.

I thought there was history here of this guy beating his wife?