The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: Attero Dominatus on March 27, 2008, 01:23:32 AM
-
Colombia seizes uranium from leftist guerrillas
27 Mar 2008 03:16:58 GMT
Source: Reuters
By Hugh Bronstein
BOGOTA, March 26 (Reuters) - Colombia said it seized at least 66 pounds (30 kg) of uranium from the country's biggest left-wing rebel group on Wednesday, the first time radioactive material has been linked to the four-decade-old guerrilla war.
The uranium was found in a rural area long considered a Marxist guerrilla stronghold just south of the capital Bogota.
It is being examined by government experts, the defense ministry said in a statement, although it did not say where the material came from or what it could be used for.
An expert on Colombia's cocaine-fueled conflict said rebels of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, do not have the facilities needed to make a bomb with uranium.
"This appears to have been part of a black market operation that the guerrillas were trying to use to make money," said Pablo Casas, an analyst at Bogota think-tank Security and Democracy.
"This is new for Colombia and could bring the FARC into the major leagues of black market terrorist transactions," he said.
More: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N26296862.htm
-
Dirty bombs coming our way.
--------Just another reason to vote for Mccain. He is the only one running who will fight the terrorists. Its the only reason I'm voting for him.
God help us if Obama/Jimmy Carter II gets elected.
How many Americans will die because of Liberal incompetence?
-
Dirty bombs coming our way.
--------Just another reason to vote for Mccain. He is the only one running who will fight the terrorists. Its the only reason I'm voting for him.
God help us if Obama/Jimmy Carter II gets elected.
How many Americans will die because of Liberal incompetence?
lol, McCain would do exactly what Bush did in this circumstance. Nothing.
-
So now you're privvy to what's being done behind the scenes? You have insight as to what's being done at CIA and elsewhere?
Wow, you must be a friggin HOOT at parties.
-
WWRPD?
-
Holy crap.
-
WWRPD?
OMG that is too funny! (this is the first time I have seen that used -- hahahahaha).
-
WWRPD?
Nothing............that's another country and none of our buisness. We need to cut off aid to Columbia nd all other places and bring all of our troops home. That uranium isn't in the USA so it's not a problem
-
WWRPD?
Nothing............that's another country and none of our buisness. We need to cut off aid to Columbia nd all other places and bring all of our troops home. That uranium isn't in the USA so it's not a problem
You forgot to add:
This is probably a false flag operation ala Gulf of Tonkin, but if the US did get hit by a dirty bomb its blowback for our years of meddling in foreign affairs against the poor, oppressed Marxist revolutionaries.
-
So now you're privvy to what's being done behind the scenes? You have insight as to what's being done at CIA and elsewhere?
Wow, you must be a friggin HOOT at parties.
I don't need to be "privvy". Bush hasn't even mentioned this. The only talk from the government is from the state department. You would think that finding uranium would be a slightly important thing to talk about.
-
WWRPD?
Nothing............that's another country and none of our buisness. We need to cut off aid to Columbia nd all other places and bring all of our troops home. That uranium isn't in the USA so it's not a problem
You forgot to add:
This is probably a false flag operation ala Gulf of Tonkin, but if the US did get hit by a dirty bomb its blowback for our years of meddling in foreign affairs against the poor, oppressed Marxist revolutionaries.
thats either a stupid or irrelevant statement. You choose which it is.
-
Care to actually try and demonstrate what you think must be the error or are you going to puss-out yet again with another of your non-statements?
Paul does in fact make such moronic statements.
I is relevant because you brought in McCain to counter the statement that Hillary and Obama would leave us exposed to such threats as if that retard from Tx Dist 14 would be any different.
-
Dirty bombs coming our way.--------Just another reason to vote for Mccain. He is the only one running who will fight the terrorists. Its the only reason I'm voting for him.
God help us if Obama/Jimmy Carter II gets elected.
How many Americans will die because of Liberal incompetence?
lol, McCain would do exactly what Bush did in this circumstance. Nothing.
From listening to Liberal politicians since 9/11, I get the impression that they would blame America then appologise for our own existence for this situation.
I don't get that impression from McCain.
-
Just because some terrorists are stupid, doesn't mean all terrorists are stupid. You have to be fairly intelligent to fly a plane...
-
Care to actually try and demonstrate what you think must be the error or are you going to puss-out yet again with another of your non-statements?
Paul does in fact make such moronic statements.
I is relevant because you brought in McCain to counter the statement that Hillary and Obama would leave us exposed to such threats as if that retard from Tx Dist 14 would be any different.
the one making moronic statements here is you. I have not even mentioned ron paul here. I also didn't mention hillary or obama. Try some reading comprehension classes out, it would be useful for you.
-
Care to actually try and demonstrate what you think must be the error or are you going to puss-out yet again with another of your non-statements?
Paul does in fact make such moronic statements.
I is relevant because you brought in McCain to counter the statement that Hillary and Obama would leave us exposed to such threats as if that retard from Tx Dist 14 would be any different.
the one making moronic statements here is you. I have not even mentioned ron paul here. I also didn't mention hillary or obama. Try some reading comprehension classes out, it would be useful for you.
Oh, I get it it. People can't mention candidates unless pre-approved by you.
Why aren't you arguing this line with MrMann? "I don't know why you're bringing Hillary and Obama into this"[/snivel] Or do your so-called principles only apply the idiot from Tx Dist 14?
Excuse me testicle-breath, but the subject was about how Hillary and Obama would be poor choices for dealing with a serious issue. You took a swipe at McCain as if that moron you vote for has something to brag about. The the idiot from Tx Dist 14 embarrasses you so much perhaps you should get off your knees and find a new boyfriend.
the one making moronic statements here is you. I have not even mentioned ron paul here...
What an interesting Freudian slip: ron paul = moronic statement
heh
-
Care to actually try and demonstrate what you think must be the error or are you going to puss-out yet again with another of your non-statements?
Paul does in fact make such moronic statements.
I is relevant because you brought in McCain to counter the statement that Hillary and Obama would leave us exposed to such threats as if that retard from Tx Dist 14 would be any different.
the one making moronic statements here is you. I have not even mentioned ron paul here. I also didn't mention hillary or obama. Try some reading comprehension classes out, it would be useful for you.
Oh, I get it it. People can't mention candidates unless pre-approved by you.
Why aren't you arguing this line with MrMann? "I don't know why you're bringing Hillary and Obama into this"[/snivel] Or do your so-called principles only apply the idiot from Tx Dist 14?
Excuse me testicle-breath, but the subject was about how Hillary and Obama would be poor choices for dealing with a serious issue. You took a swipe at McCain as if that moron you vote for has something to brag about. The the idiot from Tx Dist 14 embarrasses you so much perhaps you should get off your knees and find a new boyfriend.
the one making moronic statements here is you. I have not even mentioned ron paul here...
What an interesting Freudian slip: ron paul = moronic statement
heh
freudian slip? the term "blowback" (which you posted) is something paul says alot. Also, the subject has nothing to do at all with how hillary or obama would be poor choices. Once again, you lack reading comprehension. The subject is that Colombia seized uranium from FARC, not something political.
I'm not arguing that line with MrMann because A. that statement was addressed to you.(yep, reading comprehension again...) B. MrMann only knows how to use the "ad hominem" approach.
You would think that I would conceal my support for RP if I was so embarrased by him, right?
BTW, yes, the gay jokes really do make you look intelligent, keep up the good work.
-
Ooooh! You deduced blowback was a Paulian reference. He's a good boy, yes he is!
And who the **** are you to tell us we cannot frame a military story in a political context? Military-politics...they kinda go together. It figures a typical Paulestinian couldn't figure out that uranium on an open market in an age of global terrorism.
And yes, you do seem embarrassed by RP because you never argue FOR him you just snivel when people point ou his idiocy and even then you can't argue the point--in this case RP's head-burying and BAF mentality--you just whine.
fag...and a whiny little one at that.
-
Ooooh! You deduced blowback was a Paulian reference. He's a good boy, yes he is!
And who the **** are you to tell us we cannot frame a military story in a political context? Military-politics...they kinda go together. It figures a typical Paulestinian couldn't figure out that uranium on an open market in an age of global terrorism.
And yes, you do seem embarrassed by RP because you never argue FOR him you just snivel when people point ou his idiocy and even then you can't argue the point--in this case RP's head-burying and BAF mentality--you just whine.
fag...and a whiny little one at that.
and here we go again. SB, you really need to learn how to read. I didn't say you couldn't do anything. You really need to actually try to read the words I type instead of reading the first word then assuming the rest. Really SB, whats the point in arguing for him here of all places? all the responses would be either " :mental:", " :bird:", any other assorted emoticon, mr.mann making yet another thread about me, and a few childish ad-hominems from you and a few others (AKA "non responses"). Everyone else would simply not care. So tell me, what is the point?
-
WWRPD?
Nothing............that's another country and none of our buisness. We need to cut off aid to Columbia nd all other places and bring all of our troops home. That uranium isn't in the USA so it's not a problem
You forgot to add:
This is probably a false flag operation ala Gulf of Tonkin, but if the US did get hit by a dirty bomb its blowback for our years of meddling in foreign affairs against the poor, oppressed Marxist revolutionaries.
FARC is only using this stuff to build a powerplant, for peaceful purposes! WHY CAN'T YOU NEO-CONS UNDERSTAND!!!!
-
and here we go again. SB, you really need to learn how to read. I didn't say you couldn't do anything. You really need to actually try to read the words I type instead of reading the first word then assuming the rest. Really SB, whats the point in arguing for him here of all places? all the responses would be either " :mental:", " :bird:", any other assorted emoticon, mr.mann making yet another thread about me, and a few childish ad-hominems from you and a few others (AKA "non responses"). Everyone else would simply not care. So tell me, what is the point?
Weird, cause in this thread he never mentioned you or RP; you chimed in on his (very reasonable) comment of your own accord then complain he isn't worth arguing with.
And, no, it is not an ad hom to point out the fact that you never address substance all you do is "*yawn*" You don't debate points, you snivell.
Please tell us:
Why we can't discuss, in this particular thread, why certain politicians would be poor choices when events like this are occurring?
Why we can't point out the fact RP would be one of the poorest choices because he's an ostrich with a blame-America-first complex?
-
:banghead: Every thread John posts on ends up this way. John ruins any conversation about the OP with inane remarks designed to start a fight. And sure enough, a long drawn out fight follows.
I just wish bitch slaps would actually mean something.
-
and here we go again. SB, you really need to learn how to read. I didn't say you couldn't do anything. You really need to actually try to read the words I type instead of reading the first word then assuming the rest. Really SB, whats the point in arguing for him here of all places? all the responses would be either " :mental:", " :bird:", any other assorted emoticon, mr.mann making yet another thread about me, and a few childish ad-hominems from you and a few others (AKA "non responses"). Everyone else would simply not care. So tell me, what is the point?
Weird, cause in this thread he never mentioned you or RP; you chimed in on his (very reasonable) comment of your own accord then complain he isn't worth arguing with.
And, no, it is not an ad hom to point out the fact that you never address substance all you do is "*yawn*" You don't debate points, you snivell.
Please tell us:
Why we can't discuss, in this particular thread, why certain politicians would be poor choices when events like this are occurring?
Why we can't point out the fact RP would be one of the poorest choices because he's an ostrich with a blame-America-first complex?
ok. So you think any other candidate would just have said "oh look uranium, who cares"? Mr.Mann seems to think that McCain is the only one who would do anything. Do you really agree with that?
-
:banghead: Every thread John posts on ends up this way. John ruins any conversation about the OP with inane remarks designed to start a fight. And sure enough, a long drawn out fight follows.
I just wish bitch slaps would actually mean something.
try not to have a heart attack/stroke with all the anger you have.
-
i wonder how many pages this thread will have by tommorow? :popcorn:
-
:banghead: Every thread John posts on ends up this way. John ruins any conversation about the OP with inane remarks designed to start a fight. And sure enough, a long drawn out fight follows.
I just wish bitch slaps would actually mean something.
try not to have a heart attack/stroke with all the anger you have.
(Mr Mannn hits Bitchslap, #608. Looks an inane post. Thinks, "What a child." chooses not to respond. Throwing pearls to swine, and all that. Notes time, plans to come back in an hour for another bitch slap)
-
:banghead: Every thread John posts on ends up this way. John ruins any conversation about the OP with inane remarks designed to start a fight. And sure enough, a long drawn out fight follows.
I just wish bitch slaps would actually mean something.
try not to have a heart attack/stroke with all the anger you have.
(Mr Mannn hits Bitchslap, #608. Looks an inane post. Thinks, "What a child." chooses not to respond. Throwing pearls to swine, and all that. Notes time, plans to come back in an hour for another bitch slap)
how sad. The obsession continues.
-
:banghead: Every thread John posts on ends up this way. John ruins any conversation about the OP with inane remarks designed to start a fight. And sure enough, a long drawn out fight follows.
I just wish bitch slaps would actually mean something.
Thats now how I see it.
I see a topic started. Matrix makes a comment. Doesn't matter what it is, whether or makes sense or not (much like the Bear incident). People like you, or Snuggle Bunny, then get your Matrix hard-on and attack every little word he says. Usually you twist the context of it (much like the Bear incident) to something he really didn't mean at all.
Sorry guys, but Matrix is not the bad guys here. You are. You have some obsession (which I believe he has aptly pointed out) with him. If you don't like him, it would be extremely easy to ignore his posts, but you don't. You just exacerbate the situation by attacking him over and over again.
Grow up guys.
-
Jm is allowed to question if McCain is an adequate choice to deal wiht a given issue, but we are also allowed to respond in kind. However, once criticism of RP is levelled all discourse ceases and JM switches to snivel and whine mode and never deals with the point of why RP is a ****ing moron.
-
Jm is allowed to question if McCain is an adequate choice to deal wiht a given issue, but we are also allowed to respond in kind. However, once criticism of RP is levelled all discourse ceases and JM switches to snivel and whine mode and never deals with the point of why RP is a ******* moron.
criticize ron paul all you want.
-
Screw Ron Paul, we need to send an expert to check this out. What, Valerie? Your husband was an ambassador, and has a special expertise in tracking down contraband deals? Really? Well, if you say so...
:rotf:
-
Screw Ron Paul, we need to send an expert to check this out. What, Valerie? Your husband was an ambassador, and has a special expertise in tracking down contraband deals? Really? Well, if you say so...
:rotf:
:rotf:
-
criticize ron paul all you want.
Yes, but can you actually present a cogent defense of his so-called policies?
-
criticize ron paul all you want.
Yes, but can you actually present a cogent defense of his so-called policies?
your going to label everything I say a "non response."
-
your going to label everything I say a "non response."
"*yawn*" et al is a non-response.
Your very first response in this thread actually had a point that could be debated on its merits but as soon as criticism of The Moron appeared you went into typical snivel and quibble mode.
My point is: don't go throwing stones at Buch or McCain for doing "nothing" in response to a comment that Hillary and Obama would be dangerous at the helm in such matters when you live in a glass obstetrician's office because The Moron would be deserting valuable allies, gutting our military and intel assets, pretending threats that are there don't exist and damning us for the threats that he actually had to acknowledge.
And I was able to condense those 70 words into a simple "WWRPD" to which everyone--except supporters of The Moron--was able to comprehend.
"WWRPD" remains my critique. If you don't think The Moron would desert valuable allies, gut our military and intel assets, pretend threats that are there don't exist and/or damn us for the threats that he actually had to acknowledge I'd love to hear why you think this is so OR if you think he would and he would be correct to do so I would also be entertained by the exchange OR if you thiink he would desert allies etc and think its a foolish prospect that would be an intriguiing dialogue as well OR perhaps you might have another thought somehow dealing with the issue.
Alas, hope--when based on experience--is fleeting.
-
your going to label everything I say a "non response."
"*yawn*" et al is a non-response.
Your very first response in this thread actually had a point that could be debated on its merits but as soon as criticism of The Moron appeared you went into typical snivel and quibble mode.
My point is: don't go throwing stones at Buch or McCain for doing "nothing" in response to a comment that Hillary and Obama would be dangerous at the helm in such matters when you live in a glass obstetrician's office because The Moron would be deserting valuable allies, gutting our military and intel assets, pretending threats that are there don't exist and damning us for the threats that he actually had to acknowledge.
And I was able to condense those 70 words into a simple "WWRPD" to which everyone--except supporters of The Moron--was able to comprehend.
"WWRPD" remains my critique. If you don't think The Moron would desert valuable allies, gut our military and intel assets, pretend threats that are there don't exist and/or damn us for the threats that he actually had to acknowledge I'd love to hear why you think this is so OR if you think he would and he would be correct to do so I would also be entertained by the exchange OR if you thiink he would desert allies etc and think its a foolish prospect that would be an intriguiing dialogue as well OR perhaps you might have another thought somehow dealing with the issue.
Alas, hope--when based on experience--is fleeting.
he also would have done the same thing Bush did, and what everyone else would have done in this instance. Nothing. Bush hasn't even mentioned it. You would think that he would at least condemn someone.