The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Revolution on September 04, 2010, 11:18:52 AM
-
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-04-10 11:22 AM
Original message
Why did so many people vote for Barack Obama two years ago??
And why are so many against him now? What changed?
Of course, there is a big difference between campaigning and governing. But why did so many supporters desert this new President? Hasn't he done a very good job under the circumstances?
What were the expectations? Did they expect him to be an FDR progressive? Or were they disappointed by his pragmatic, bi-partisan style?
How was he able to get so many different groups behind him? The young, the old, the independents, the moderates - gave him an over-whelming victory in November 2008. What has changed since then?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9073877
The Kentuck Dumor's stupid is showing again. (Does it ever hid?)
:lmao: I'm not even going to attempt to explain the changes, and situations he has put us in. You fine ladies and gents know the score.
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-04-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. We were hoping for change. nt.
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-04-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. We Was Had Updated at 11:29 AM
Snookered. Gulled. Diddled. Seduced and abandoned. Mocked. Abused. Robbed of our nation and our government. Insulted. Injured.
I could probably add to this list, but everyone is invited to share....
Well, the mass DUmor is right, but I suspect we agree on his point for different reasons
PS: I have always kind of wondered, but never bucked up the courage to ask. What does "nt" mean? Nice try or something else? It's like I see it every other post in DUmmy Land.
-
"NT" is put in the text section of a post, when one doesn't have much more to say than what is in the post's title. It means "no text."
-
What's changed, kentuck?
Well, besides that you can't lift Pittstain's writing prose off wholesale, not much with you communist-fellating bastards.
-
What changed is one was words and the other is actions.
-
From above;
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Sep-04-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. We Was Had Updated at 11:29 AM
Snookered. Gulled. Diddled. Seduced and abandoned. Mocked. Abused. Robbed of our nation and our government. Insulted. Injured.
I could probably add to this list, but everyone is invited to share....
OH?!?!?! So, now you DUmmies see what is happening to the Country, huh?!? After you put the "baby dictator" in office. Too late now. Look how much damage he and you have done to this Country!! :bird: :censored: :bird:
-
"I won." = bi-partisan style.....what a hoot... :rotf:
No DUmmies, you weren't robbed, it's those that pay taxes that were/are/will be robbed.
-
Here DUmmie I'll explain it again. I'll type slow so you can follow along at home.
Your hero sold the gullible a bill of goods via a huge line of bullshit on the campaign trail.
Once elected the shit began to stink.
Now that obamas shit stinks, no one wants him anymore.
-
Of course, there is a big difference between campaigning and governing
You'd never know that by watching The Won. I don't think he's "governed" a day yet.
-
BIPARTISAN?????
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!1111111oneeleven
-
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Sat Sep-04-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. I also think it was a MSM love affair, the dregs of 8 years of Bush, the
idea of significant change and IMO a rock star personality. I'm hoping over the next two years things might change.
:rotf: :rotf:
Heope in one hand, and crap in the other...
QC (1000+ posts) Sat Sep-04-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
79. But he was so just dreeeeeeeeeeeeeeamy! n/t
A new level of stooooopid.
Name removed (0 posts) Sat Sep-04-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
Hmmm, I'm wondering what was said here to provoke $kinner.
The bonfire got substantially bigger.
-
OH?!?!?! So, now you DUmmies see what is happening to the Country, huh?!? After you put the "baby dictator" in office. Too late now. Look how much damage he and you have done to this Country!! :bird: :censored: :bird:
The DUmmies knee jerk reaction will be to say that he caved to the right. In essence he wasn't Socialist enough.
Given some time to put thought into their answer...the DUmmies will simply say that it was Bush's fault.
-
Already happening.
-
Already happening.
Never stopped.
-
Very true. I was just refering to the thread in question.
-
What were the expectations? Did they expect him to be an FDR progressive? Or were they disappointed by his pragmatic, bi-partisan style?
Extra-strength delusion. Apparently to these miscreants, bipartisanship equates to "I'm right, you're wrong, and we're going to ignore your input while we discuss everything behind closed-doors and, when it comes up for a vote, we're going to jump through legislative hoops to nullify your vote and ignore the will of the people in the process."
Also, I'm relatively certain that pragmatic doesn't mean what they think it means (to them it just sounds "hip"). Or else they're just one fry short of a happy-meal. OH noes!!, that's right, they want to ban happy-meals.
-
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-04-10 11:22 AM
Original message
Why did so many people vote for Barack Obama two years ago??
And why are so many against him now? What changed?
Of course, there is a big difference between campaigning and governing. But why did so many supporters desert this new President? Hasn't he done a very good job under the circumstances?
What were the expectations? Did they expect him to be an FDR progressive? Or were they disappointed by his pragmatic, bi-partisan style?
How was he able to get so many different groups behind him? The young, the old, the independents, the moderates - gave him an over-whelming victory in November 2008. What has changed since then?
Lol. 0-Bama ran on a whole "changey" thing. He got it. :-)
-
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Sep-04-10 11:22 AM
Original message
Why did so many people vote for Barack Obama two years ago??
And why are so many against him now? What changed?
The deficit, the unemployment rate, confidence in the President. You know, small stuff like that.