The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: The Village Idiot on June 02, 2010, 03:23:50 PM

Title: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: The Village Idiot on June 02, 2010, 03:23:50 PM
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/02/ftc-to-reinvent-journalism/
excerpt

Quote
The nation needs a strong, independent press, the FTC argues, and so they want to find ways for government to “reinvent” journalism.  If that sounds vaguely Orwellian to you, the actual language in the Federal Trade Commission’s discussion-points memo should have hairs standing on the backs of necks across the nation.  It shows a wildly laughable rationale for government intervention that would prop up the failing newspaper model in a manner that would put the entire industry at the mercy of the federal bureaucracy it’s supposed to keep in check.

That memo:

http://www.ftc.gov/opp/workshops/news/jun15/docs/new-staff-discussion.pdf
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: JohnnyReb on June 02, 2010, 03:27:59 PM
Dan Rather has been rehabilitated. Lying is in vogue again.
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: Chris_ on June 02, 2010, 03:44:37 PM
Surprise... more legislation and more taxes
Quote
Proposal 1: Federal Hot News Legislation.
Some stakeholders have proposed amending the Copyright Act to specifically recognize hot news protection. Advocates argue “the copyright act allows parasitic aggregators to ‘free ride’ on others’ substantial journalistic investments,” by protecting only expression and not the underlying facts, which are often gathered at great expense.

They define parasitic aggregators as those that, without permission, post enough material to render the original news stories redundant. This free-riding undercuts revenue for those who make investments in journalism and undermines theirincentive to do so, according to advocates.30 They suggest that federal hot news legislation could help address revenue problems facing newspapers by preventing this free-riding

Others proponents of the hot news doctrine recommend that Congress amend the Copyright Act to provide express statutory federal protection of short duration and limited scope to the facts reported in news articles.34 They are concerned that state law evolution cannot provide the clarity or uniformity required for interstate news media.

Proposal 2: Statutory Limits to Fair Use

Proposal 3: Licensing the News
One workshop participant presented a specific proposal to modify the copyright laws to create a licensing arrangement.  Thus, this speaker suggests amending the copyright laws to create a content license fee (perhaps $5.00 to $7.00) to be paid by every Internet Service Provider on each account it provides. He suggests creating a new division of the Copyright Office...

II. Potential Revenues from Indirect and Direct Government Support
Tax on broadcast spectrum.
Tax on consumer electronics.
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: The Village Idiot on June 02, 2010, 03:55:54 PM
Content controlled by government, nice, and we have to PAY for it too. wow.
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: rich_t on June 02, 2010, 05:31:09 PM
Making plans to go buy more brass/lead components.

I KNOW what is coming and I KNOW it ain't gonna be pretty.
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: bkg on June 02, 2010, 06:51:30 PM
Making plans to go buy more brass/lead components.

I KNOW what is coming and I KNOW it ain't gonna be pretty.

Suppose that depends on how you define "pretty."
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: vesta111 on June 02, 2010, 09:35:43 PM
Making plans to go buy more brass/lead components.

I KNOW what is coming and I KNOW it ain't gonna be pretty.

Rich, if things go this far, how are you going to know who to defend yourself from.??
Title: Re: FTC to "reinvent" journalism (egads)
Post by: Pat on June 03, 2010, 05:41:56 AM
Rich, if things go this far, how are you going to know who to defend yourself from.??

this is a question most doomsday people can't answer.

I think there will be small "tribes" or "states" created that become onto themselves.