The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: fourseasons on April 20, 2010, 07:31:51 PM

Title: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: fourseasons on April 20, 2010, 07:31:51 PM
Hi. I'm a 17 year old gay male who has some questions regarding conservatives stance on gays.  I was born the way I am and have always been this way.  People who think it is a "choice" or a "lifestyle" are wrong I would never choose to be ridiculed by my peers and lose family connections. The way I see it is that homosexual people should be allowed to have the same rights that heterosexual people have, they shouldn't be given different standards because of who they are. I live in a small town where being gay is not generally accepted especially in high school. I have other friends who have been physically and verbally harassed because of their sexual orientation in front of teachers who do nothing to stop it.  What I don't understand is why many conservatives are againest the idea's of nondiscrimination and equal rights for everybody.

I will respect everybody's opinion just please no insults.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: NHSparky on April 20, 2010, 07:36:55 PM
How about this one...when your sexuality is the only thing that defines you, your life is pretty ****ing shallow. 

Conservatives will TOLERATE gay people.  We'll never CONDONE the lifestyle.  Please try and learn the difference.  And as far as "gay marriage" goes, please tell me what church has lasted for long when it allows gays to marry.  Civil unions, or domestic partnerships?  Hey, whatever you do in your bedroom is your deal, but don't think for one second that you can cry "civil rights!" and all of a sudden we'll give a shit.  Marriage was a RELIGIOUS institution long before it was a legal one, and to shove that down our throats is an affront to our belief in God, Allah, Buddah, Jehovah, what-have-you.

Anything else?
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: DixieBelle on April 20, 2010, 07:37:35 PM
What do you consider rights? Or are you speaking in broader terms and mean "acceptance"? We all have civil rights and basic human rights regardless of sexual orientation.

Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: NHSparky on April 20, 2010, 07:39:40 PM
What do you consider rights? Or are you speaking in broader terms and mean "acceptance"? We all have civil rights and basic human rights regardless of sexual orientation.



Amen.  Do not confuse "equal rights" with "special rights".  IMHO, the LGBT movement isn't about equal rights, and hasn't been for quite some time.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Carl on April 20, 2010, 07:43:58 PM
What you do in your bedroom is not a concern of mine so long as it is with a consenting adult even though I consider it disgusting and abhorrent.
When one demands special consideration because of their abnormal,and yes it is, sexual preference then I say no.

Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 20, 2010, 07:47:12 PM
Hi. I'm a 17 year old gay male who has some questions regarding conservatives stance on gays.  

Wow. My condolences. Also its pretty sad that your public school has completely failed you and left you completely ignorant of other peoples viewpoints.


I was born the way I am and have always been this way.  

You were born having sex with other males? Sad. Must have freaked the doctors out.

People who think it is a "choice" or a "lifestyle" are wrong I would never choose to be ridiculed by my peers and lose family connections.

You choose who to have sex with, unless you are raped and most don't count that as sex.

The way I see it is that homosexual people should be allowed to have the same rights that heterosexual people have,

They do have the same rights.

they shouldn't be given different standards because of who they are.

Anyone got that zombietimes link handy?

 I live in a small town where being gay is not generally accepted especially in high school.

No sex should be acceptable in school, that is not what you go to school for.

I have other friends who have been physically and verbally harassed because of their sexual orientation in front of teachers who do nothing to stop it.

Boohoo. I was bullied for being fat. Boo hoo.

 What I don't understand is why many conservatives are against the idea's of nondiscrimination and equal rights for everybody.

We are FOR equal rights for everyone. You are talking about liberals it sounds like.

I will respect everybody's opinion just please no insults.

I'll pray for you.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 20, 2010, 08:04:51 PM
Hit N Run Poster?

Or will he check in tomorrow?
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: NHSparky on April 20, 2010, 08:05:41 PM
Hit N Run Poster?

Or will he check in tomorrow?

My guess is on option 1.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 20, 2010, 08:07:38 PM
That is disappointing, could have been interesting.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: fourseasons on April 20, 2010, 09:27:36 PM
ok when I say "equal rights" i mean the same rights that people take for granted and would protest if they were taken away such as Job Security, Hospital Visitation, being in the military and dare I say... Marriage... it is not special consideration

I agree that acting upon urges is a choice, but being lesbian gay bi or transgendered is not a choice there's more to being gay then having sex.  people who are gay fall in love in just the same way that people that are straight. You do not choose who you fall in love with.

I always thought that freedom of religion also meant the freedom from religion. there's a separation between church and state. also sects of Buddhism in the united states that celebrate gay marriage aren't you denying them their religious freedom by denying them marriage?
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: IassaFTots on April 20, 2010, 09:30:22 PM
That is disappointing, could have been interesting.

I dunno.  If he is actually a real 17 y/o homosexual, I sincerely doubt he would stay for tea and crumpets after the responses.  Jes sayin.

Oh well.....after having read the last post, I guess I was mistaken.  It happens. 

Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 20, 2010, 09:38:27 PM
1. Business should have the right to hire and fire as they see fit. If they believe a person detracts from their business for any reason they should be able to let them go.

2. Hospitals should have the right to decide if its in their interest to restrict visitations, such as in the ICU because it affects other patients. In most cases though I see very few places that doesn't let people visit their friends. I have visited people in the hospital with no problem, I guess if you waltz in and announce your sexuality you should expect a problem.

3. Being in the military is not a right. The military exists for a specific reason, to kick butt, and they have every right to NOT take people for any reason that might detract from that mission. Then again, if your not going around announcing your sexual preference, you know like MOST people don't, people won't know or care.

4. Marriage? You have every right to get married to a girl. That is what marriage is. WHAT you are apparently trying to say is that you want SOCIETY to PRETEND that two men, two women, or 3 women, 1 man and a dog can be "married". How cute. What you are really asking for is acceptabce and that is not going to happen. I do not have a "right" to be accepted and neither do you. It is not something you can demand.

If your talking about the "benefits" of marriage, there shouldn't be any. (except monogamy and being able to be with a trusted spouse to make babies with)

Then again you and your "partner" can be as married as you want in your own home and your own life. The problem comes from demanding others accept you as the same as them when its clearly not.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Lord Undies on April 20, 2010, 09:44:41 PM
We all have our crosses to bear.  Homosexuals are not special or unique in any way.  They have the same rights as everyone else.  THE EXACT SAME RIGHTS.  

I have homosexual relatives (cousins - one male, 52 - one female, 70) who have lived quiet and dignified lives, and they are very successful in business.  They lead their lives in the confines of who they are, just like the rest of us.  They are not special.  They are just folks who are homosexual and do not care to have sex with the opposite sex.  That makes them "not normal".  They know this.  They work around it.  They don't expect the world to change for them.

Do you get where I'm going?  Just shut the f*ck up and be who you are.  It's your cross to bear.  Deal with it.  Don't expect the world to conform to you.  You are NOT SPECIAL IN ANY WAY nor do you deserve any special consideration.    
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Thor on April 20, 2010, 10:29:10 PM

I always thought that freedom of religion also meant the freedom from religion. there's a separation between church and state. also sects of Buddhism in the united states that celebrate gay marriage aren't you denying them their religious freedom by denying them marriage?
The first amendment expressly states "The amendment prohibits the making of any law "respecting an establishment of religion", impeding the free exercise of religion". What this means is more than a "wall of separation between the church and the state", as Jefferson wrote about to some Baptist Church in Va. Do you have ANY concept of the "free exercise thereof"?? Young misguided lad, you really need to study the TRUE history, NOT what you my have learned in public school. The crux of the religion clause in the first amendment was to keep the government out of the churches, attempting to avoid what England had at the time. It NEVER once suggested that people be NOT be exposed to Judeo-Christian values. Our laws are explicitly based on those values.

Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 20, 2010, 10:36:41 PM
fourseasons has been mis-educated. He should sue the school for making him dumber than when he started.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: littlelamb on April 20, 2010, 10:39:18 PM
I feel sorry for him but he seems to be like the rest of his generation and wants everything given to them and I hope he comes back
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 21, 2010, 01:27:08 AM
ok when I say "equal rights" i mean the same rights that people take for granted and would protest if they were taken away such as Job Security, Hospital Visitation, being in the military and dare I say... Marriage... it is not special consideration
Every society has standards of sexual conduct. Stop acting like your situation is unique and that you are somehow he only one with expectations being put upon them.

An employer might fire an employee if they found out they were having an affair with a married person. A hospital may refuse the that person visitation if their lover takes sick. The state may even level legal penalties against the married lover. The military can even imprison members who engage in adultery.

IOW: there are standards and those standards do not disappear just because 2 people imagine themselves as having an emotional/sexual attraction.

You do have all the rights of a US citizen. You have the rights to free speech, peaceable assembly, petition for the redress of grievances, to vote when of age of majority, etc etc etc

No one here would move to deny you those rights and they and most would/do fight to defend them.

And while you're sitting there enumerating the rights you want to provide yourself how about asking whether or not the people you're lecturing by acting as a ventriloquist dummie have the right to decide the shape and color of the society they live in. If they have the same political rights as you do to free speech, campaigning, etc then they have a right to vote for candidates that enact laws that regulate when people are old enough to marry, when will the state recognize a marriage and all the enforcements that entails, etc.

If your political agenda cannot secure the consent of the governed then it seeks to rule by dictate.

Quote
I agree that acting upon urges is a choice, but being lesbian gay bi or transgendered is not a choice there's more to being gay then having sex.  people who are gay fall in love in just the same way that people that are straight. You do not choose who you fall in love with.
Love is an act of will, so either you're lying about being in love or you're lying about being gay.

BTW - the bullshit self pity party your masters have fed you denies the fact that countless societies have acculturated homosexuality.

Quote
I always thought that freedom of religion also meant the freedom from religion. there's a separation between church and state. also sects of Buddhism in the united states that celebrate gay marriage aren't you denying them their religious freedom by denying them marriage?

That's what you get for thinking.

Stop listening to the people who want you weak and dependent upon them, stand-up and being a goddam man already. Those idiot liberals masters of yours want you looking to them and them only for your rights and happiness. No one here needs anything from anyone to be happy and productive they do it themselves first and expect not to be ****ed with for it. If you're waiting for gay marriage and a repeal of DADT then--well--you're an idiot and you deserve to go to your grave 70 years from now as a frustrated idiot.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: fourseasons on April 21, 2010, 08:57:43 AM
1. Business should have the right to hire and fire as they see fit. If they believe a person detracts from their business for any reason they should be able to let them go.

2. Hospitals should have the right to decide if its in their interest to restrict visitations, such as in the ICU because it affects other patients. In most cases though I see very few places that doesn't let people visit their friends. I have visited people in the hospital with no problem, I guess if you waltz in and announce your sexuality you should expect a problem.

3. Being in the military is not a right. The military exists for a specific reason, to kick butt, and they have every right to NOT take people for any reason that might detract from that mission. Then again, if your not going around announcing your sexual preference, you know like MOST people don't, people won't know or care.

4. Marriage? You have every right to get married to a girl. That is what marriage is. WHAT you are apparently trying to say is that you want SOCIETY to PRETEND that two men, two women, or 3 women, 1 man and a dog can be "married". How cute. What you are really asking for is acceptabce and that is not going to happen. I do not have a "right" to be accepted and neither do you. It is not something you can demand.

If your talking about the "benefits" of marriage, there shouldn't be any. (except monogamy and being able to be with a trusted spouse to make babies with)

Then again you and your "partner" can be as married as you want in your own home and your own life. The problem comes from demanding others accept you as the same as them when its clearly not.


1.Businesses have the right to hire and fire based on qualifications and job performance.  A business should not be able to fire someone solely based on race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.  Unless being homosexual detracts from your job performance in some way then a business should not be allowed to discriminate.

2. The patient should be allowed to choose who they are allowed to see not the hospital.  all i'm saying is that gays should be allowed to see their partners when in hospitals in all the same cases that straights are allowed to see their partners.  I realized today that Obama has recently ordered that all hospitals that recieve medicare to allow the patients to choose who is allowed to see them.

3. I was unaware that being gay meant you could no longer fight.  the real problem is homophobia in the military.

4. Ok first off I am not supporting polygamy or zoofilia what I am is supporting is giving same-sex relationships that same benefits that married couples have.  You said that there should not be any benefits that come with marriage. what about government benefits like receiving social security, medicare and disability benefits for spouses or obtaining insurance benefits through a spouses employer.  same-sex relationships should be given the option to have these benefits as well since love is love.

We all have our crosses to bear.  Homosexuals are not special or unique in any way.  They have the same rights as everyone else.  THE EXACT SAME RIGHTS. 

I have homosexual relatives (cousins - one male, 52 - one female, 70) who have lived quiet and dignified lives, and they are very successful in business.  They lead their lives in the confines of who they are, just like the rest of us.  They are not special.  They are just folks who are homosexual and do not care to have sex with the opposite sex.  That makes them "not normal".  They know this.  They work around it.  They don't expect the world to change for them.

Do you get where I'm going?  Just shut the f*ck up and be who you are.  It's your cross to bear.  Deal with it.  Don't expect the world to conform to you.  You are NOT SPECIAL IN ANY WAY nor do you deserve any special consideration.   

First off congratulations to your relatives to live their lives that way it would be very hard. I refuse to live a lie about who I am I will not stay in the closet with millions of other Americans.  For there to be change someone has to stand up to what society says is "normal" otherwise we would have no reform in any area of government.



Im not listening to any "liberal master" I live in conservative town raised by conservative christian parents.  Im saying this because I feel it is right not because im being pressured by a "liberal master"



thanks everyone for your responses!
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Lord Undies on April 21, 2010, 09:10:17 AM

First off congratulations to your relatives to live their lives that way it would be very hard. I refuse to live a lie about who I am I will not stay in the closet with millions of other Americans.  For there to be change someone has to stand up to what society says is "normal" otherwise we would have no reform in any area of government.



What in the name of all things societal made you believe my cousins are "in the closet".  They are both very open about with whom they like to have sex.  It just doesn't define their ever breathing moment.  They are just folks first.  And very successful folks at that.  They are both in life-long relationships, even though my male cousin admits no homo male is faithful to one partner.  In fact, they use to cruise bars together when they were younger.  That's the nature of the beast: "So many men - so little time!".  Not much to base a "marriage" upon, huh?

You can't change what is normal.  Sorry.  And I can shoot down each and every argument you have to show how what was once considered normal is now not normal and the other way around.  Normal, like darkness and light, will always be exactly what it is.

Homosexuality will never be normal because homosexual relationships will always require a third person in order for one or both of the queer folk to conceive.  Which brings me to the point where I want to clarify that homosexual is NOT A RACE within the human race.  It is a flaw found in all the real races.  Like birth defects. 
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Splashdown on April 21, 2010, 09:18:15 AM
ok when I say "equal rights" i mean the same rights that people take for granted and would protest if they were taken away such as Job Security, Hospital Visitation, being in the military and dare I say... Marriage... it is not special consideration

I agree that acting upon urges is a choice, but being lesbian gay bi or transgendered is not a choice there's more to being gay then having sex.  people who are gay fall in love in just the same way that people that are straight. You do not choose who you fall in love with.

I always thought that freedom of religion also meant the freedom from religion. there's a separation between church and state. also sects of Buddhism in the united states that celebrate gay marriage aren't you denying them their religious freedom by denying them marriage?

Where is job security a right? Where is hospital visitation a right? Where is military service a right? Where is marriage a right?


I'm reading the wrong constitution.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on April 21, 2010, 09:27:14 AM
In what society has marriage EVER involved any arrangement besides at least one man on one side, and at least one woman on the other?  In the whole of human history, gay marriage is purely a creature of only the last decade, it is indeed a quest for a 'Special' right, not an equal right.

Aside from that, in general I agree with the main drift that private sexual conduct between consenting adults is the business of nobody but the participants, though the gay activist community seems hell-bent on flinging their sexuality in everyone's face, which I find very off-putting, childish, and frankly disgusting.

For reasons that would have to be lived to be understood, and at 17 would be wildly outside your experience or comprehension, I do not think allowing openly gay people into the armed forces is a good idea.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: longview on April 21, 2010, 09:54:36 AM
The rights that I have, you have. 

People's preferences regarding what they do between two consenting adults is a non-issue for me.  But, I do get annoyed at homosexual prosthelytizing.  As a gay neighbor once said when another gay person brought up their desire for special consideration during a business lunch, "What is wrong with those people?"  She and her partner owned a house together and didn't discriminate in their friendships with the neighbors.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: rich_t on April 21, 2010, 10:10:43 AM
Quote
I am is supporting is giving same-sex relationships that same benefits that married couples have.

Such as?
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 21, 2010, 10:55:19 AM
4. What I am is supporting is giving same-sex relationships that same benefits that married couples have. 

Same sex "relationships" aren't marriage. If you mean two men or two women who are "madly" in love with each other and want to stay together forever in monogamous bliss they need to use a different word. I don't care what two adult people (we are talking two right?) do but the word "marriage" is already taken, find another word.

And then get ready for the income tax marriage (or whatever word) penalty. heh.

But don't expect or demand "society" to accept it as normal and okay.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 21, 2010, 11:00:52 AM
Such as?

Do male-female relationships get the benefit of marriage without marriage?

I have to mean he is asking about two men or two women who are madly and deeply in "love" and want to spend the rest of their lives in a committed, monogamous bliss.

Otherwise he thinks gay shackups are the same as marriage.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Lord Undies on April 21, 2010, 11:01:07 AM
Quote from: fourseasons on Today at 08:57:43 am
Quote
4. What I am is supporting is giving same-sex relationships that same benefits that married couples have.


Good luck talking God into that one!
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: NHSparky on April 21, 2010, 11:24:31 AM
Quote
the real problem is homophobia in the military.

Spoken like someone who hasn't the faintest ****ing clue of what it's like in the military.

Dear Junior,

As a veteran, as many of us here are (or still serving), I think you owe us an apology for your thoughtless and ignorant statement.

Then you can go play in the ****ing traffic.  I never gave a shit as to the sexual orientation of those around me (and yes, some were gay or bisexual--one guy on my first boat later became HIV-positive) as long as it didn't interfere with the mission.  PERIOD.  For you to use that bullshit excuse pretty much negates any other worthless talking points you may come here to disseminate.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 21, 2010, 11:43:36 AM
1.Businesses have the right to hire and fire based on qualifications and job performance.  A business should not be able to fire someone solely based on race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.  Unless being homosexual detracts from your job performance in some way then a business should not be allowed to discriminate.
Do you REALLY want to work for someone who is homophobic?

Really?

Suppose someone has serious moral objections to homosexulaity, do you really want to use the armed force of the state to compel them to accomodate you? Because that is what you are asking. You want the law to give you the power to send the cops after people who don't like you.

Quote
2. The patient should be allowed to choose who they are allowed to see not the hospital.  all i'm saying is that gays should be allowed to see their partners when in hospitals in all the same cases that straights are allowed to see their partners.  I realized today that Obama has recently ordered that all hospitals that recieve medicare to allow the patients to choose who is allowed to see them.
Why do you need the armed force of the state to do that?

Why not vote with your feet/dollars? If the demand is big enough the market will provide.

Quote
3. I was unaware that being gay meant you could no longer fight.  the real problem is homophobia in the military.
I had 2 gay friends as soldiers in my unit in Florida and a lesbian in my current unit that was very happy to introduce me to her GF this past drill.

STFU unless you know better.

Quote
4. Ok first off I am not supporting polygamy or zoofilia what I am is supporting is giving same-sex relationships that same benefits that married couples have.  You said that there should not be any benefits that come with marriage. what about government benefits like receiving social security, medicare and disability benefits for spouses or obtaining insurance benefits through a spouses employer.  same-sex relationships should be given the option to have these benefits as well since love is love.
So, IOW, your stance isn't based on principles but on what is personally convenient to you.

Try "consent of the governed" it's a helluva concept.

Quote
Im not listening to any "liberal master" I live in conservative town raised by conservative christian parents.  Im saying this because I feel it is right not because im being pressured by a "liberal master"
Bullshit, you are steeped in victimhood borne of decades of being told you can never make it on your own because life is too fundamentally unfair. You bought that bullshit hook, line and sinker.

If you ever reached a point in your life where you said to yourself, "**** the government and **** what others think, I'm going to be my own man." you would instantly be sacrificing the liberal political power that comes from being a victim but you would be a happier and more productive person for it.

Hell, people like you make me resist their pleas for special status just from spite. If I have to give you things for you to be happy you don't deserve to be happy. Man-up or suffer; the choice is yours. Prove to us you're free enough to make that choice.

Quote
thanks everyone for your responses!

meh
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: debk on April 21, 2010, 12:55:52 PM
Do male-female relationships get the benefit of marriage without marriage?  No they don't. I've been in the same relationship for 16+ years. We have no benefits of marriage because we aren't married. NOR DO WE HAVE THE PRIVILEDGES THAT MARRIEDS DO SHOULD ONE OF US BE HOSPITALIZED. Without a notarized power of attorney, specifying one is permitted to be in charge of the other's medical care, WE HAVE NONE! Either one of my children supercede my partner's control over my medical care should I be unable to make decisions for myself without a PoA designating him in control. Both of my children would gladly give him control. However, we have a PoA for me regarding his care, as his children would not allow me to have control.

A gay partnership has every RIGHT to do the same as we have. They just have to draw up a medical PoA, have it notarized, and keep it handy. Any hospital in the country will honor it. 


I have to mean he is asking about two men or two women who are madly and deeply in "love" and want to spend the rest of their lives in a committed, monogamous bliss.

Otherwise he thinks gay shackups are the same as marriage.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: fourseasons on April 21, 2010, 01:03:11 PM
Hey everyone thanks for sharing all your viewpoints with me.  I feel like I now better understand how conservatives feel about the issue.  I'm happy that people took the time to read what I had to say

I'm sorry if I have said anything that has offended anyone it wasn't meant too

I'm realizing that I don't have time to respond to everyones post so if anyone wants to talk more about this issue you can email me a lespaul403@aim.com

Once again thanks everyone for your time and your responses this has helped me a lot.

much love to everyone please if you want to send me a email do so! and I will respond  as soon as I have  time

Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Thor on April 21, 2010, 03:20:54 PM
So he "runs away" with a lame excuse of not having time. Junior, YOU posted the question. Deal with the answers!! Like Sparky, I had several gay people under my supervision while I was USN. It didn't bother me that they were lesbians. What bothered me was the fact that they were dirt bag Sailors. My job specialty even required security clearances, just as Sparky's did. The "gay" issue was never raised and this was back in the EARLY 80s (80-83 to be specific and at a time when being gay could get one kicked out of the military, period)

And, DebK is right. I was scheduled for surgery on the 15th. I'm not married but have a woman. I drew up a medical power of attorney giving her rights to oversee my medical care. The hospital had no problem with the situation. Unfortunately for me, my blood tests were all out of whack and my surgery postponed.

Like the others have said, most of us simply just don't give a shit if you want to puff on a peter or lickalottapuss. Homosexuals don't want equal rights, they want special rights. You spoke of a wall of separation between the church and the state and YET, you want the state to interfere with the church by forcing gay marriages. As far as I'm concerned, marriage is a religious institution and the state should have ZERO involvement with it. In my opinion, if there's a church out there that will marry a gay couple, then go for it. Just quit pushing your (not yours specifically) gay agenda down our throats!!! Hell, when I was out in San Diego, I even had friends that were gay. No biggie. Just leave me to my preferences and I'll let you to yours.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: rich_t on April 21, 2010, 04:04:12 PM
Do male-female relationships get the benefit of marriage without marriage?

I have to mean he is asking about two men or two women who are madly and deeply in "love" and want to spend the rest of their lives in a committed, monogamous bliss.

Otherwise he thinks gay shackups are the same as marriage.

I am trying to figure out which benfits he has in mind.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: SilverOrchid on April 21, 2010, 06:09:42 PM
That was lame.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 22, 2010, 09:05:11 AM
Apparently homosexuality does not make one open, tolerant...or even remotely respectful of people's private, personal lives:

Quote
Three bisexual men are suing a national gay-athletic organization, saying they were discriminated against during the Gay Softball World Series held in the Seattle area two years ago.

The three Bay Area men say the North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance in essence deemed them not gay enough to participate in the series…

Whether the alliance is public or private will likely have to be determined in court, since the plaintiffs characterize the alliance as a “public accommodation” that’s open to the public and uses public softball fields…

Each of the three plaintiffs was called into a conference room in front of more than 25 people, and was asked “personal and intrusive questions” about his sexual attractions and desires, purportedly to determine if the player was heterosexual or gay, the lawsuit alleges.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2011657770_lawsuit21m.html

Again, the OP parrots what his masters want him to say about private matters, inclusiveness, blah-blah-blah but in reality the world they seek to run is far different from their propaganda.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: The Village Idiot on April 22, 2010, 10:52:56 AM
Again, the OP parrots what his masters want him to say about private matters, inclusiveness, blah-blah-blah but in reality the world they seek to run is far different from their propaganda.

100% true
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Texacon on April 22, 2010, 11:12:04 AM
Quote
I always thought that freedom of religion also meant the freedom from religion. there's a separation between church and state. also sects of Buddhism in the united states that celebrate gay marriage aren't you denying them their religious freedom by denying them marriage?

Kind of interesting, for someone with no agenda, to pick and choose what they capitalize.  I mean, looking at your posts it's obvious you know where the shift key is .....

Just sayin',

KC
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 22, 2010, 05:37:13 PM
A two-fer:

Quote
Veteran Rep. Babette Josephs (D., Phila.) last Thursday accused her primary opponent, Gregg Kravitz, of pretending to be bisexual in order to pander to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender voters, a powerful bloc in the district.

“I outed him as a straight person,” Josephs said during a fund-raiser at the Black Sheep Pub & Restaurant, as some in the audience gasped or laughed, “and now he goes around telling people, quote, ‘I swing both ways.’ That’s quite a respectful way to talk about sexuality. This guy’s a gem.”

Kravitz, 29, said that he is sexually attracted to both men and women and called Josephs’ comments offensive.

“That kind of taunting is going to make it more difficult for closeted members of the LGBT community to be comfortable with themselves,” Kravitz said. “It’s damaging.”

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/20100422_In_Pa__House_race__identity_politics_with_a_twist.html
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Red October on April 22, 2010, 06:39:36 PM
Quote
Veteran Rep. Babette Josephs (D., Phila.) last Thursday accused her primary opponent, Gregg Kravitz, of pretending to be bisexual in order to pander to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender voters, a powerful bloc in the district.

As if he's the first Democrat to pander.   ::)  Any Republican saying this would be disembowled in the media.  But that fugly old crow gets a pass.  Sure, the local media will bring it up, but guaranteed to be quickly forgotten.  If you want to get away with being able to say almost anything, put a D by your name.    
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: Chris_ on April 22, 2010, 07:42:33 PM
What happened to the butt munching pole smoker? Looks like I missed the fun. :lmao:
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: formerlurker on April 22, 2010, 07:56:49 PM
Every society has standards of sexual conduct. Stop acting like your situation is unique and that you are somehow he only one with expectations being put upon them.

An employer might fire an employee if they found out they were having an affair with a married person. A hospital may refuse the that person visitation if their lover takes sick. The state may even level legal penalties against the married lover. The military can even imprison members who engage in adultery.

IOW: there are standards and those standards do not disappear just because 2 people imagine themselves as having an emotional/sexual attraction.

You do have all the rights of a US citizen. You have the rights to free speech, peaceable assembly, petition for the redress of grievances, to vote when of age of majority, etc etc etc

No one here would move to deny you those rights and they and most would/do fight to defend them.

And while you're sitting there enumerating the rights you want to provide yourself how about asking whether or not the people you're lecturing by acting as a ventriloquist dummie have the right to decide the shape and color of the society they live in. If they have the same political rights as you do to free speech, campaigning, etc then they have a right to vote for candidates that enact laws that regulate when people are old enough to marry, when will the state recognize a marriage and all the enforcements that entails, etc.

If your political agenda cannot secure the consent of the governed then it seeks to rule by dictate.
Love is an act of will, so either you're lying about being in love or you're lying about being gay.

BTW - the bullshit self pity party your masters have fed you denies the fact that countless societies have acculturated homosexuality.

That's what you get for thinking.

Stop listening to the people who want you weak and dependent upon them, stand-up and being a goddam man already. Those idiot liberals masters of yours want you looking to them and them only for your rights and happiness. No one here needs anything from anyone to be happy and productive they do it themselves first and expect not to be ****ed with for it. If you're waiting for gay marriage and a repeal of DADT then--well--you're an idiot and you deserve to go to your grave 70 years from now as a frustrated idiot.

He didn't even touch this one MSB.   Great post.
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: JLO on April 22, 2010, 08:07:01 PM
We all have our crosses to bear.  Homosexuals are not special or unique in any way.  They have the same rights as everyone else.  THE EXACT SAME RIGHTS.  

I have homosexual relatives (cousins - one male, 52 - one female, 70) who have lived quiet and dignified lives, and they are very successful in business.  They lead their lives in the confines of who they are, just like the rest of us.  They are not special.  They are just folks who are homosexual and do not care to have sex with the opposite sex.  That makes them "not normal".  They know this.  They work around it.  They don't expect the world to change for them.

Do you get where I'm going?  Just shut the f*ck up and be who you are.  It's your cross to bear.  Deal with it.  Don't expect the world to conform to you.  You are NOT SPECIAL IN ANY WAY nor do you deserve any special consideration.    

VERY well put  :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Conservative's stance on gays
Post by: littlelamb on April 23, 2010, 08:52:55 AM
I haven't seen any where here where anyone has asked what his DUmmy name is