The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: Mr Mannn on April 10, 2010, 07:29:20 PM
-
A word of warning. I am not sure of this source. It looks like one of the many blogs disguised as a news source. That said there is a link to a FOX news show with Judge Napalitano discussing this topic in depth. Its because of the FOX video as a confirming source that I feel free to print this article.
--just be aware these fake news sites are a dime a dozen, and they can no more be counted upon to give a factual account than any other unregulated blog.
This is just an excerpt. Click on the link to read the rest.
http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Conservative-Examiner~y2010m4d10-When-armies-are-unleashed-against-citizens2-pages-of-the-ObamaCare-bill
Fox News legal analyst and judge Andrew Napolitano has raised serious questions about a new 'private army' funded by the ObamaCare bill.
At issue is a provision, 2 pages long, tucked into the bill that creates and funds a 6000-person brigade of physicians that would be trained by the military and operate with the full powers of the military should the President so direct.
The provision also gives the President broad powers to take National Guard troops from the states in non-wartime and place them in the service of the Federal Government. This mandate would override any objection raised by Governors, who at present possess the only civilian powers over the National Guard.
This video contains commentary on this subject by Andrew Napolitano. To get to the portion of the program that discusses the private army provision, watch the entire video, which is a definite eye-opener.
Several troubling issues come to the surface concerning this portion of the ObamaCare bill, which has now been signed into law.
First, until now if the government needed physicians it could hire them to serve under Health and Human Services to work in the Centers for Disease Control or the Public Health Service. For the first time in American history a special provision is made to place physicians in military training and service during non-wartime.
Why does the President need a 6000-person brigade of military physicians to 'take care of our health'?
Second, why does Barack Obama feel that he needs to take National Guard away from the states during peacetime to place them under his command, to be utilized as part of a federal army, when the Guard specifically operates under the control of the states, except during wartime?
The implications of that provision, in and of itself, are chilling.
Third, the physicians that are placed into military training and service will not, according to the bill, be utilized in overseas wars such as Afghanistan. They are to remain here in the states.
The link to the FOX interview is the third one down.
-
If thats true its scary.
-
THIS is the FOX confirmation of the story....Hold on to your socks...
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AF5s_AeoP-4[/youtube]...
-
THIS is the FOX confirmation of the story....Hold on to your socks...
...
You did it wrong:
[youtube=425,350]AF5s_AeoP-4[/youtube]
EDIT: Or maybe YouTube just isn't working right now.
-
Seems like it might be much ado about nothing:
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/27/ready-reserve-corps-over-60-years-old/
-
A word of warning. I am not sure of this source. It looks like one of the many blogs disguised as a news source. That said there is a link to a FOX news show with Judge Napalitano discussing this topic in depth. Its because of the FOX video as a confirming source that I feel free to print this article.
--just be aware these fake news sites are a dime a dozen, and they can no more be counted upon to give a factual account than any other unregulated blog.
This is just an excerpt. Click on the link to read the rest.
http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Conservative-Examiner~y2010m4d10-When-armies-are-unleashed-against-citizens2-pages-of-the-ObamaCare-bill
The link to the FOX interview is the third one down.
Hi,
I have a friend who is well connected in the government. From what I gather they are preparing for civil unrest. He and I were discussing confiscation of weapons and I said that no one would enforce it. The national guard is not going to fire on their own, nor would the local or state police. As he understood it the plan is in place to use the national guard and move them around so they are not in their home state.
Now I understand the state of AZ, and perhaps some others have passed resolutions declaring their sovereignty and in times of civil unrest they reserve the right to bring home their guard to protect their homeland.
I see a clusterf*** on the horizon. The mid term elections cannot get here fast enough to suit me.
When it comes out that the banks are bankrupt, the government is bankrupt, and the food and oil supply gets interrupted even for a short period of time it could get ugly. You can be sure BO would be itching to declare martial law.
regards,
5412
-
Is YouTube working for anyone else?