The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: The Village Idiot on March 15, 2010, 04:54:43 PM

Title: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: The Village Idiot on March 15, 2010, 04:54:43 PM
http://www.uncoverage.net/2010/03/the-ayatollah-khomeinis-booksex-with-children-and-animals/


A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate vaginally, but sodomising the child is acceptable. If a man does penetrate and damage the child then, he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl will not count as one of his four permanent wives and the man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister… It is better for a girl to marry at such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house, rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven. ["Tahrirolvasyleh", fourth edition, Qom, Iran, 1990]

A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, but selling the meat to a neighbouring village is reasonable.

If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, a ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed as quickly as possible and burned
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: thundley4 on March 15, 2010, 04:57:19 PM
Nuke 'em.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: The Village Idiot on March 15, 2010, 04:59:15 PM
Nuke 'em.

I dunno. It seems to be where our culture is headed anyways.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: JohnnyReb on March 15, 2010, 05:08:41 PM
I read that several years ago....sick bunch of bastards aren't they?
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: jinxmchue on March 15, 2010, 05:15:25 PM
Nuke 'em.

Don't worry.  God will.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on March 16, 2010, 05:04:17 AM
Don't worry.  God will.
And in the meantime?

Not to pick a religious brouhaha but: God will also feed the hungry...one day. In the meantime soup kitchens are an act of piety.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: whiffleball on March 16, 2010, 07:39:44 AM
Nuke 'em.

The only way to be sure.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: The Village Idiot on March 16, 2010, 11:55:50 AM
I dunno, apparently since I don't have kids I'm not allowed an opinion.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: ironhorsedriver on March 16, 2010, 12:50:50 PM
And of course everyone still thinks they should be tolerated, coddled, and be free to practice their sick beliefs on our soil. WE are suppose to adapt to them. Meanwhile, Israel is building housing in their own Capitol city, and our President is outraged.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: Airwolf on March 16, 2010, 07:10:09 PM
Nuke 'em.

Our tax dollars paid for them so we might as well use them.
Title: Re: Ayatollah says sex with babies is acceptable
Post by: Alpha Mare on March 16, 2010, 07:41:26 PM
Everyone in town received a 'postcard' notice last week about a "high risk" sex offender; victim was 7 years old. The :censored: lives near 2 schools, but outside the "child safety zone".   :banghead:

Quote
There are three different risk levels:

Level one (low): indicates that the person poses a low danger to the community and will not likely engage in criminal sexual conduct.
Level two (moderate): indicates that the person poses a moderate danger to the community and may continue to engage in criminal sexual conduct.
Level three (high): indicates that the person poses a serious danger to the community and will continue to engage in criminal sexual conduct.

The authorities know he's going to 'continue to engage', but his right to live here is greater than our childrens' right to safety - so the major consensus is that it's up to someone else to handle the problem.