The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Tucker on February 17, 2010, 07:38:15 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7730901
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 07:37 AM
Original message
"Back off" Glen Beck.
Rachael last night. Her last words on the subject. Almost whispered, almost spit. "Back off". Two words, says it all. I know who my money's on.
A bull dyke in a china shop. What are the rating on PMSNBC? 5 total viewers. :lmao:
HillbillyBob (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It sounded like a warning for Gbeck to back
off or he would regret it.
She sounded as if she meant it. Angry even, or as angry as I have ever seen her.
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It was "back off". I added the Glen Beck because it was clear who
she was referring to. She did not say his name but the whole segment was devoted to him. I was trying to be careful not to misquote her.
So the Boston drunkards mammy adds "Glenn Beck" to make the bull dyke appear more menacing.
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. She's pushing his ego buttons, and giving him fair warning
She's always armed with the truth and a plethora of facts. It should be interesting since Beck will probably not back off. His large gigabite ego won't allow it.
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't want to paraphrase the show but that segment was about
him calling her a liar on his show. And him distorting what she said.
I missed the show. One of the few that I've missed. :(
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Rachel not only told Beck to "Back off!" but gave him "the look" to end all looks.
It was a "suggestion" to Beck that he'd be better off if he'd knock it off, as he probably doesn't want to see what else she could throw at him.
Rachel apologizes when she is wrong, but she doesn't back down when she is right. If anyone can bring him down, she can.
Go, Rachel.
-
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Wed Feb-17-10 07:37 AM
Original message
"Back off" Glen Beck.
Rachael last night. Her last words on the subject. Almost whispered, almost spit. "Back off". Two words, says it all. I know who my money's on.
Awww, blow me. The dyke is DYING to start a feud with Beck so someone, anyone might watch her show. The best thing that could happen to her would be for Beck to push. If Beck ignores her (like the rest of America), her show will be cancelled shortly.
-
His large gigabite ego won't allow it.
MSNBC's Wesley Crusher has a huge ego, yes.
-
It seems the dyke misrepresented what Beck had to say.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/02/16/glenn-beck-calls-rachel-maddow-dishonest-propaganda
The dyke cherry-picks what Beck says, he points it out, and she says to back off because she wants to lie and not get called on it. Makes sense.
.
-
It seems the dyke misrepresented what Beck had to say.
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/02/16/glenn-beck-calls-rachel-maddow-dishonest-propaganda
The dyke cherry-picks what Beck says, he points it out, and she says to back off because she wants to lie and not get called on it. Makes sense.
.
I'm shocked. That almost never happens. ::)
-
I liked Rachel Madcow when she starred in Twin Peaks.
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3954741248/nm0001492
:-)
-
I liked Rachel Madcow when she starred in Twin Peaks.
http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3954741248/nm0001492
:-)
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
-
I'm shocked. That almost never happens. ::)
Re: Newsbusters...what a contrast at that site, the dyke vs. Jody Miller. :drool:
-
penises frighten here
-
She cherry picks what Beck said on global warming to make it appear that he said something he didn't.
Beck rightfully called her on it.
And in typical Libtard fasion Meaty Fingers Maddow is playing the Liberal victim card.
-
penises frighten here
It's one way to shut her up. :naughty:
-
After all, Beck's point Monday was that Maddow and Company stopped the audio from his radio program last week just as he was going to demolish their entire premise by saying, "How many times have I said both for hurricanes and no hurricane, this doesn't, one storm, one storm does not prove anything?"
Beck's challenge to Maddow therefore was to explain WHY this audio was cut off at PRECISELY the moment her point about him would be discredited.
Instead of doing so, she defended HER omission by saying that HE didn't play the entire tape from her Friday show.
How preposterous.
This battle began when Maddow accused Beck of telling his audience that last week's snowstorms disproved anthropogenic global warming. Beck responded by demonstrating that in the very program Maddow was citing, he said he didn't believe that was the case.
As a result, he called her a dishonest purveyor of propaganda.
As such, the onus was on Maddow to explain why she and her crew cut off the audio just as Beck was going to discredit her entire point.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/02/17/rachel-maddow-strikes-back-glenn-beck-i-didnt-lie-back#ixzz0foXPEg9F
-
If Madcow tells Beck to back off and no one's watching, did it really happen? :-)
-
I cannot believe Beck is dumb enough to pick a fight with someone whose audience would fit inside a football stadium. No one will ever know or care what this bull dagger carpetmuncher says, unless Beck makes an issue of it. Half of Keef's audience was given to him by O'Reilly keeping up his stupid feud.
-
I hadn't kept up with any of this, it flew under my radar. I just think the opening salvos to this thread were hilarious. The power and genius they ascribe to her is beyond delusional. Such as this comment:
If anyone can bring him down, she can.
riiiiight.
-
If anyone can bring him down, she can.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! That twat couldn't fit in the same glass! Beck would tear her to shreds! Do these idiots even listen to Beck?
ETA: ( sorry, that was a little crass, but she is a complete asshole! )
-
This isn't worthy of a separate thread, imo.
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Wed Feb-17-10 08:42 AM
Original message
Glenn Beck Loses 103 Sponsors as His UK Broadcast Runs 5 Days With No Ads
Today, Color of Change and StopBeck.com announced that the United Kingdom has forcefully rejected Fox News host Glenn Beck. In fact, the UK broadcast of his show “was forced to run without any advertisements†for five days in a row as of yesterday. Additionally, 103 companies have agreed to stop their ads from appearing on his program. Some of the latest defections include Allstate Insurance, Anheuser-Busch, Idaho Potato Commission, Marriott International, Volkswagen, and Western Union. Some of their comments:
– “We in no way want to promote the hateful rhetoric of Mr. Glenn Beck, and therefore take this matter very seriously,†said Dino Balzano, director of advertising at Concord Music Group, parent company of Hear Music, in an email to ColorOfChange.org.
– “We do not intend to have any additional ad placements during the program,†said Jeff Flaherty, spokesperson for Marriott International, in an email to ColorOfChange.org. “I’d like to point out that diversity and inclusion are core values at Marriott and an essential component of our success.â€
Continued>>>>
http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/02/17/glenn-be... http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7731081
The DUmmies seem to think this is a big deal. I think it's a poor broadcast decision myself. I doubt that Beck could draw the audience in the UK that he does here, so advertisers aren't all that keen on advertising on his show anyway.
-
penises frighten here
Probably why she cut hers off!
Cindie
-
Awww, blow me. The dyke is DYING to start a feud with Beck so someone, anyone might watch her show. The best thing that could happen to her would be for Beck to push. If Beck ignores her (like the rest of America), her show will be cancelled shortly.
That's the whole point, and why dykes like Maddow and Olbermann start these "feuds." They're out of ideas and frantically looking for an extra moonbat or two to prop up their little shows. What they need is to create video bouncies, complete with cops and bushes.
-
If GE wasn't dumping cash into the entire NBC empirre Madcow would be on the streets looking for cans to take in for the deposit.
-
Why on earth would Beck be on TV in the UK? Not many popular shows here focus on British internal politics. And how did he ever get 103 sponsors? I guess the government-run free-TV-for-all (plus tax) is so bad the people will watch any American show, even if they don't understand what the man is talking about.
How do they even get Fox News in the U.K.? Must be like the CNN you get in hotels, but that's CNN International, which induces sleep quicker than Michael Jackson's cardiologist.
-
I cannot believe Beck is dumb enough to pick a fight with someone whose audience would fit inside a football stadium.
Or a VW Beetle. :mental:
-
Or a VW Beetle. :mental:
Or a hall closet.
Hey, how appropriate!
-
How do they even get Fox News in the U.K.?
I believe it's on satellite. Seeing that they are owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Sky News IIRC, it shouldn't be too hard.
-
Probably why she cut hers off!
Cindie
I bet she swings a bigger one than Olbermann.
-
I believe it's on satellite. Seeing that they are owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Sky News IIRC, it shouldn't be too hard.
Sky News is all over the place in Europe....if there's a tv in the room, there's Sky News. Just like CNN used to be here in US years ago.
Somehow, I just don't see Beck quaking in his Converse sneaks over Rachel Maddow.....not gonna happen... ::)
-
Out of curiosity, have any of you ever mentioned Maddow or Olby to people who don't actively follow politics? I have, on several occasions. Rarely does anyone have a clue who I'm referencing. They always know who Beck and Rush are, even if they've never listened to them. I'm still trying to find one human in the real world who has ever heard of Thom Hartmann.
-
That must be a ball-breaker for Madcow to know that despite her being an uber-educated Rhodes Scholar, she couldn't possibly come close to beating Beck in a fair fight.
-
That must be a ball-breaker for Madcow to know that despite her being an uber-educated Rhodes Scholar, she couldn't possibly come close to beating Beck in a fair fight.
Oh I don't know. It would be unfair if it were between a male and female. It seems fair between two males.
-
Probably why she cut hers off!
Cindie
I thought her middle name was Tucker..........
-
Or a VW Beetle. :mental:
Slug Bug!!!!! :hammer: :-)
-
Slug Bug!!!!! :hammer: :-)
Punch buggy. :naughty:
-
I thought her middle name was Tucker..........
?????????????
-
?????????????
I think the reference was to a crossdresser that "tucks" his appendage out of the way.
-
I think the reference was to a crossdresser that "tucks" his appendage out of the way.
Well that clears it up. :cheersmate:
-
Well that clears it up. :cheersmate:
Doesn't make it any better though, does it?
:tongue:
:-)
-
Oh I don't know. It would be unfair if it were between a male and female. It seems fair between two males.
I meant battle of wits, but hey, it's all good--she still can't hold a candle to him, and that's got to piss her off mightily.
-
I meant battle of wits, but hey, it's all good--she still can't hold a candle to him, and that's got to piss her off mightily.
She kills him with bonus smug points.