The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Freeper on January 23, 2010, 01:17:04 PM
-
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-23-10 02:00 PM
Original message
How about this for a Corporation? Updated at 2:00 PM
Let's call it Progressive Resources, Inc. It's not a non-profit. It sells a product...just one product, a bumper sticker saying "Progressive Resources Supports Progressives." Each bumper sticker costs $100. That $100 also gets you one share of the corporation and entitles you to vote on the corporation's policies.
All proceeds from sales of Progressive Resources products, after any applicable taxes, will be used to buy television time to campaign for progressive candidates for public office, particularly in places where they stand a decent chance of winning the election. Candidates to be supported will be chosen in elections, based on votes of the corporation's shareholders in elections held online.
Many other such corporations could also be created. If they're going to allow corporations to spend as much money as they want on campaign ads, then let's form corporations with that as their sole purpose. To avoid conflicts with regulations on non-profits, each can sell a product for a price that far, far, exceeds the cost of the product, along with a share in the corporation.
What we cannot change, we should use to advance our own goals. Seems simple enough to me.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7554161
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-23-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I prefer direct, undiluted advertising over diluted Updated at 2:00 PM
influence. Let's say that the corporation I propose sells 10,000 bumper stickers. That provides $1 million to work with. In a Congressional District race, that's a substantial amount of money. And, there are no non-profit rules to follow.
Good idea except you won't have 1million dollars left. You will have to pay taxes. Pay your employees a living wage and health care packages.
And if you make a profit Obama may tax you even higher. Plus you forgot the money needed to buy the bumper stickers, shipping, and sales tax.
-
Assuming they find that many idiots to pay $100 for a bumper sticker they might have around $50 after all expenses and taxes, assuming they don't use Chinese slave labor with no health benefits.
-
I'm confused. Are corporations good now? Or just certain types? :mental:
-
Pure genius, primitives. Do it. :mental:
.
-
That's the point, MineralMan. You are free to do whatever you want. So stop trying to take that away from others. OK?
-
Pure genius, primitives. Do it. :mental:
Heck if it worked, we'd just copy it
-
This is their stupidest idea yet
Aside: Who would have thunk that the week surrounding The One's 1st year anniversary as President would have all of the primitives in a tailspin ? :evillaugh:
-
This is their stupidest idea yet
Aside: Who would have thunk that the week surrounding The One's 1st year anniversary as President would have all of the primitives in a tailspin ? :evillaugh:
Its almost like a beautiful death spiral
-
These people seem like they'll follow anyone with a stupid idea. Where's Jim Jones when you need him?
-
Liberals rich enough to afford $100 for a bumper sticker don't buy bumper stickers. Liberals who do buy bumper stickers cannot afford $100 for a bumper sticker.
-
This is their stupidest idea yet
Aside: Who would have thunk that the week surrounding The One's 1st year anniversary as President would have all of the primitives in a tailspin ? :evillaugh:
Well, I sorta did. I don't know where to find it, but about this time last year I posted about how by the same time in 2010, the Little Goons and democrats and all those types would be in a reality meltdown.
-
Liberals rich enough to afford $100 for a bumper sticker don't buy bumper stickers. Liberals who do buy bumper stickers cannot afford $100 for a bumper sticker.
but but but it'll come with a share in DUmmies INC and is basically a political contribution to boot.
-
Heck if it worked, we'd just copy it
Here's what got me:
MineralMan
How about this for a Corporation?
Let's call it Progressive Resources, Inc. It's not a non-profit. It sells a product...just one product, a bumper sticker
Why sell anything? You don't have to have a product or service in order to be incorporated. Just set up a corp, sell shares, and everything's an expense. Nothing in a corp says you have to try and make money. The gov't just says if you want to be incorporated, here's how you go about it. It doesn't say you have to be any good at it.
.
-
Well, I sorta did. I don't know where to find it, but about this time last year I posted about how by the same time in 2010, the Little Goons and democrats and all those types would be in a reality meltdown.
I figured it was coming, but not so soon, or all at once. - Democratic Underground has all the markings of a great Greek Tragedy as of late.
-
Here's what got me:
Why sell anything? You don't have to have a product or service in order to be incorporated. Just set up a corp, sell shares, and everything's an expense. Nothing in a corp says you have to try and make money. The gov't just says if you want to be incorporated, here's how you go about it. It doesn't say you have to be any good at it.
FGL Inc, LLC: could it 'own' a blogspot blog or does blogspot own it? Just wondering... heh
-
FGL Inc, LLC: could it 'own' a blogspot blog or does blogspot own it? Just wondering... heh
As far as I know you could form a corp that has a blog and write off the expenses. Best to talk to your accountant about how it would affect you.
.