The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on January 14, 2010, 11:01:34 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7462237
cali (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:54 AM
Original message
Sex sting in Poconos nets former chief U.N. weapons inspector (Scott Ritter)
By Andrew Scott
Pocono Record Writer
January 14, 2010
A former chief United Nations weapons inspector is accused of contacting what he thought was a 15-year-old girl in an Internet chat room, engaging in a sexual conversation and showing himself masturbating on a Web camera.
Scott Ritter of Delmar, N.Y., who served as chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 and who was an outspoken critic of the second Bush administration in the run-up to the war in Iraq, is accused of contacting what turned out to be a Barrett Township police officer posing undercover as a teen girl.
The police affidavit gives the following account:
Officer Ryan Venneman was posing as 15-year-old "Emily" in an online chat room when he was contacted by someone using the name "Delmarm4fun." This person, later identified as Ritter, told "Emily" he was a 44-year-old male from Albany, N.Y.
"Emily" told Ritter she was a 15-year-old girl from the Poconos, at which point Ritter asked for a picture other than the one "Emily" had posted on her account. Ritter then sent her a link to his Web camera and began to masturbate on camera.
"Emily" asked Ritter for his cell phone number, which he provided.
Ritter again asked "Emily" how old she was. Told she was 15, Ritter said he didn't realize she was 15 and turned off his webcam, saying he didn't want to get in trouble.
Ritter told "Emily" he had been fantasizing about having sex with her, to which she replied: "Guess you turned it off ..."
Ritter then said: "You want to see it finish," reactivated his
webcam and continued masturbating and ejaculated on camera.
The online conversation occurred in February 2009, but the investigation lasted until November, when Ritter was charged, because police had to undergo the lengthy process of obtaining court orders to get Ritter's cell phone and computer information.
Ritter is awaiting his next appearance in Monroe County Common Pleas Court. He waived his right last month to a preliminary hearing and is free on $25,000 unsecured bail.
Already posted here in breaking news.
The first reply...
malaise (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. And they still can't arrest Bush and Cheney for
war crimes.
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
36. Maybe nobody should be entrapped until Bush and Cheney are charged - how would that be
Do you have any idea what non-sequitur means? Making one event conditional on another has nothing to do with it.
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Yes, and it was used to discredit what he had to say about WMDs.
PuraVidaDreamin (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. aww shit!
I have books written by Ritter. I've seen him speak on the illegal invasion/war on Iraq. He made
a case for war crimes against B/Ch- Now why the hell did he go and do this for? Creep-
Blew his credibility all over a web cam- asshole
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Per report, he didn't know how old she was. Do NOT rule out the possibility that he's being targeted
-edit-
Ritter again asked "Emily" how old she was. Told she was 15, Ritter said he didn't realize she was 15 and turned off his webcam, saying he didn't want to get in trouble.
-edit-
Maybe he's a sleazy bastard. But maybe there's more to it. You don't speak out against the BFEE with impunity.
[Puglover (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dumb ass.
Way to blow up your career, family etc. He was a great and credible resource and now that's all history.
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
48. can they PLEASE set up Rush or Rove? they won't have to dangle the bait for long
For most of them it is still about politics. :censored:
-
The Boston Drunkard has got to be PO'd he wasn't there to receive the bukkake.
.
-
PuraVidaDreamin (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. aww shit!
I have books written by Ritter. I've seen him speak on the illegal invasion/war on Iraq. He made
a case for war crimes against B/Ch- Now why the hell did he go and do this for? Creep-
Blew his credibility all over a web cam- asshole
I'm think he blew more than his credibility on a web cam. :puke:
-
Another Beloved DU Hero Falls, Primitives Utterly Confused (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7462237)
cali (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:54 AM
Original message
Sex sting in Poconos nets former chief U.N. weapons inspector (Scott Ritter)
By Andrew Scott
Pocono Record Writer
January 14, 2010
A former chief United Nations weapons inspector is accused of contacting what he thought was a 15-year-old girl in an Internet chat room, engaging in a sexual conversation and showing himself masturbating on a Web camera.
Scott Ritter of Delmar, N.Y., who served as chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991-98 and who was an outspoken critic of the second Bush administration in the run-up to the war in Iraq, is accused of contacting what turned out to be a Barrett Township police officer posing undercover as a teen girl.
The police affidavit gives the following account:
Officer Ryan Venneman was posing as 15-year-old "Emily" in an online chat room when he was contacted by someone using the name "Delmarm4fun." This person, later identified as Ritter, told "Emily" he was a 44-year-old male from Albany, N.Y.
"Emily" told Ritter she was a 15-year-old girl from the Poconos, at which point Ritter asked for a picture other than the one "Emily" had posted on her account. Ritter then sent her a link to his Web camera and began to masturbate on camera.
"Emily" asked Ritter for his cell phone number, which he provided.
Ritter again asked "Emily" how old she was. Told she was 15, Ritter said he didn't realize she was 15 and turned off his webcam, saying he didn't want to get in trouble.
Ritter told "Emily" he had been fantasizing about having sex with her, to which she replied: "Guess you turned it off ..."
Ritter then said: "You want to see it finish," reactivated his
webcam and continued masturbating and ejaculated on camera.
The online conversation occurred in February 2009, but the investigation lasted until November, when Ritter was charged, because police had to undergo the lengthy process of obtaining court orders to get Ritter's cell phone and computer information.
Ritter is awaiting his next appearance in Monroe County Common Pleas Court. He waived his right last month to a preliminary hearing and is free on $25,000 unsecured bail.
<snip>
I noticed Wee Willie, Ritter's co author is strangely absent from commenting on this interesting news.
And now on to the stupid:
malaise (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. And they still can't arrest Bush and Cheney for
war crimes.
It's Bush's fault!
cali (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. so no one should be arrested for anything until bush cheney are charged with war crimes?
your comment is simply a non-sequitur
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
36. Maybe nobody should be entrapped until Bush and Cheney are charged - how would that be
Do you have any idea what non-sequitur means? Making one event conditional on another has nothing to do with it.
I wonder what it's like to live with that much stupid in your head.
cali (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. yes, and bush/cheney not being charged has jackshit to do with
Scott Ritter jerking off on camera to what he thought was a 15 year old girl, genius. looks like you're the one who hasn't a clue.
Hey, I'm starting to admire cali. Making sense and all that normal stuff.
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I seem to recall he had similar charges against him a few years back.
Correct! But I'd bet you didn't care back then since he was saying exactly what you wanted to hear.
malaise (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Didn't know that n/t
Uh, huh, sure. The self described smartest people on the internet missed that big stinking fact.
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Yes, and it was used to discredit what he had to say about WMDs.
Rightly so.
PuraVidaDreamin (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. aww shit!
I have books written by Ritter. I've seen him speak on the illegal invasion/war on Iraq. He made
a case for war crimes against B/Ch- Now why the hell did he go and do this for? Creep-
Blew his credibility all over a web cam- asshole.
Ha! Ha! You based your world view on the opinion of a pedophile.
cali (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. those are my sentiments as well.
pretty clear the guy has a serious problem. it doesn't speak to his credibility but this kind of crap does make whatever he has to say irrelevant as his history as a child predator will arise every time.
Well, that admiration was short lived. :whatever:
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Per report, he didn't know how old she was. Do NOT rule out the possibility that he's being targeted
-edit-
Ritter again asked "Emily" how old she was. Told she was 15, Ritter said he didn't realize she was 15 and turned off his webcam, saying he didn't want to get in trouble.
-edit-
Maybe he's a sleazy bastard. But maybe there's more to it. You don't speak out against the BFEE with impunity.
Karl Rove gets his revenge always! Never forget that.
Puglover (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dumb ass.
Way to blow up your career, family etc. He was a great and credible resource and now that's all history.
Ian David (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. Oh, ****, no. n/t
Ha! Ha! Ha! Your bitter tears give me great joy.
crazyjoe (168 posts) Thu Jan-14-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
32. so i guess he won't be invited to testify in congress any time soon
No, because he's the wrong kind of pedophile. The homosexual ones get to be the safe school czar.
-
OK, 3 threads on the same topic is enough......... for now. :-)
.
-
OK, 3 threads on the same topic is enough......... for now. :-)
.
I really hate people who do that.
Sorry!
-
Some on DU agree that he is a creep, but most seem to be more upset with him for ruining his credibility than because he attempted to engage in web-sex with a 15 year old girl :banghead:
-
I really hate people who do that.
Sorry!
No biggie. I've done it a few times myself. No doubt you were C&Ping from the island when the others were being posted.
We all love you anyway, Kim. :heart:
.
-
Ha! Ha! You based your world view on the opinion of a pedophile.
Karl Rove gets his revenge always! Never forget that.
:rofl: :lmao:
-
That man is sick needs to be hung by his balls
-
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I seem to recall he had similar charges against him a few years back.
Too bad he didn't take a cue from stinky and just jack off in front of the cat, then he might not have gotten caught.
Cindie
-
Too bad he didn't take a cue from stinky and just jack off in front of the cat, then he might not have gotten caught.
Bukkatt??
.
-
Bukkatt??
.
Oh you are SO bad!
Cindie
-
Actually, Ritter is the DUmp's second most favorite pedophile. He co-authored a great book with the first most favorite, Billy Pitt. All it cost Pitt, though, was the loss of his substitute teaching job, the only honest job he ever held. That great book is available now for one cent, from Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/War-Iraq-What-Team-Doesnt/dp/1893956385/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1263491873&sr=1-1
Wonder what the co-authors did during breaks while writing their masterpiece.
-
Wonder what the co-authors did during breaks while writing their masterpiece.
In Ritter's case, that would be "masturbaterpiece."
-
Couldn't have happened to a bigger POS. Probably had a whole harem of tweens courtesy of "good, ol' Saddam" back in the sandbox.
-
You based your world view on the opinion of a pedophile.
(http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7462237)
Kinda like muslims.
-
No biggie. I've done it a few times myself. No doubt you were C&Ping from the island when the others were being posted.
We all love you anyway, Kim. :heart:
.
Thanks!
-
For most people, a bad date means an evening with someone they don't enjoy. For Dummies, it means meeting Chris Hansen.
-
For most people, a bad date means an evening with someone they don't enjoy. For Dummies, it means meeting Chris Hansen.
Damn, you're good, sir.
Admirable.
-
Damn, you're good, sir.
Admirable.
It may very well be that these male perverts are the number one reason some woman become lesbians.
The more strange stuff I hear about the more I am beginning to wonder about the males in my life. Is there any chance they may do something outrageous, would they, could they.?
Give me a break, all this stuff going on in the world and until the last generation we woman had no idea that men would go through all these crazy stuff for sex.
You males have a mind set we woman would never believe, so much for equality of the sexes.
Outside of the story about the lady, the peanut butter and dog, in reality we woman seldom understand other females that are blatantly sexual creatures.
We do not have the anatomy for one to ---ER---experiment-- for a woman it is usually the smell, looks and the words that lead up to sex. Few woman check out a hammer and decide to implant it in the body.
Seldom is a woman rescued from an embarrassing situation.
Men now are different, they can walk past an open window and the breeze turns them on, they see sex in everything they do or see.
So why is it that males with a good carear, money and family will totally loose their senses to awake one morning and get their thingie caught in the kitchen faucet.?
It seems that these males surfing the web are almost normal when one reads of some of the strange things other men have done, the cops that catch them may in fact understand them but have to do their job.
Nuts, it has amazed me that that I gave birth to 2 humans so different from myself. As a woman birthing a female was natural, I had just replicated myself. The males were a shock, sort of like putting cookies in the oven and pulling out chicken wings. Girl babys I could understand I had been one myself---boys----another world.
I am just musing Thor, not off topic, this man caught on camera obveously had lost it, the cops got him, so how will the courts treat his intent mentally with a punishment.?
From what I have seen he never laid a hand on a 15 year old girl, so how does one convict a person for having desires that have not been acted on.?
In fact there was no victim, the pictures went to a 40 year old male. I am trying to think like the defence attorney.
ACLU can really screw up the court system, but then someone else wrote the laws and we Americans agree with them, the rest of us just sit back and :popcorn: :popcorn:
The cops are out there looking for POTENTIAL molesters, sort of like looking at Potential bank robbers, unfortunately by our laws the cops have to have evidence that that person is actually preparing to comit a crime. One needs more then intent, by law one must have the ability and the tools to rob a bank. Same for the Molesters, some 80 year old in a nursing home who is confined to bed that wants a young one will not be dragged into court.
I as a woman do understand why this man felt the need to send out pictures of himself going head on into sex, but you know as a woman I would have no idea of that mans drive.
:mental: :thatsright: :loser: this sort of thing makes us woman scared of men.
-
Actually, Ritter is the DUmp's second most favorite pedophile. He co-authored a great book with the first most favorite, Billy Pitt. All it cost Pitt, though, was the loss of his substitute teaching job, the only honest job he ever held. That great book is available now for one cent, from Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/War-Iraq-What-Team-Doesnt/dp/1893956385/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1263491873&sr=1-1
Wonder what the co-authors did during breaks while writing their masterpiece.
I imagine it is much like the school czar's job interview. Warning: NSFW
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajSAkrAI6VM[/youtube]
-
Kinda like muslims.
Ba-Zing! :-)
-
Anybody know if the Bostonian Drunkard's commented upon this yet?
I can't find any, and if the Bostonian Drunkard hasn't said anything in support of a friend and ally and co-writer of his, it shows a lack of loyalty.
-
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Thu Jan-14-10 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Per report, he didn't know how old she was. Do NOT rule out the possibility that he's being targeted
-edit-
Ritter again asked "Emily" how old she was. Told she was 15, Ritter said he didn't realize she was 15 and turned off his webcam, saying he didn't want to get in trouble.
-edit-
HE THEN TURNED THE FREAKING CAMERA BACK ON AND BLEW A LOAD YOU FREAKING INBRED MORON!!!!!!
-
Yes Ritter was one of the most vociferous critics for the left of Bush.
Turns out it is a good idea to judge a man by his enemies.