The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on December 03, 2009, 11:08:48 AM

Title: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: franksolich on December 03, 2009, 11:08:48 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.org/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7145589

Either that, or the sparkling husband primitive's wife slipped something super-strong into his food or drink.

Quote
Stinky The Clown  (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-03-09 11:40 AM
Original message
 
How should we summarily execute the secret service agents who let the glam couple in? 

This, like so much else, was a complicated matter. but as usual, the lowest turd on the shit pile gets killed for being the entire cause.

Suspend the guys. Fine them. Demote them. Put them on duty tracking down counterfeit lottery tickets in logging camps in Alaska.

Other heads never rolled. Why do we need to nuke these two bozos? Who trained them? Who was their supervisor? What happened to the back-up/redundency that should have been there?

KILL THE LITTLE GUYS!

YEAH!

I say we use axes on their necks, resting on pre-bloodied wooden stumps. And no catch baskets. Let their heads roll down the street

Quote
Richardo  (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-03-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
 
1. I'd say your choice of imagery is ill-advised.

Quote
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-03-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
 
2. No, just reassign them to protect Biden.

That ought to be punishment enough.

Quote
spanone  (1000+ posts)      Thu Dec-03-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
 
3. if the glam couple had pockets of antrhax......

Quote
arcadian  (1000+ posts)      Thu Dec-03-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
 
4. Better change that OP before some asshole reports you to the Feds.

seriously.
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: GOBUCKS on December 03, 2009, 11:47:49 AM
Quote
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts)        Thu Dec-03-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
 
2. No, just reassign them to protect Biden.

That ought to be punishment enough.
I don't care if it is a DUmmy. That is funny!
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: delilahmused on December 03, 2009, 11:51:11 AM
Sometimes it's hard to tell whether stinky is being facetious or he actually means this. Perhaps there's too many fumes from that over-full litterbox.

Cindie
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: Karin on December 03, 2009, 03:21:06 PM
He has been acting stranger than usual of late.  I'm beginning to think that Frank is right about the chemistry set.  He's having a bizarre rant like once a day. 
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: franksolich on December 03, 2009, 03:33:12 PM
He has been acting stranger than usual of late.  I'm beginning to think that Frank is right about the chemistry set.  He's having a bizarre rant like once a day. 

The sparkling husband primitive dislikes insurance companies.

Which, one assumes, includes life insurance companies.

Given his windfall affluence, the sparkling husband primitive probably has lots and lots of life insurance, despite his alleged dislike of insurance companies.

And his wife knows it.

Given the erratic nature of the bonfires the sparkling husband primitive lights, it's highly probable the sparkling husband primitive is ingesting chemicals not necessarily gotten at the pharmacy.

Given that the sparkling husband primitive is consigned to the basement most of the time, while his wife is at full liberty up on the first and second floors of the house, the sparkling husband primitive's wife has plenty of opportunity to dabble in things, including a chemistry set.

I think the sparkling husband primitive's wife is impatient to get those life insurance checks.
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: miskie on December 03, 2009, 04:41:56 PM
Kill the person(s) who let the party crashers in ?

It would probably be the best solution for the Dems, because I suspect the truth about it will do more damage.

here is my theory.

A low-level staffer went to check them in, found they weren't on the list and went to deny them access. The staffer then saw the couples surname, thought that it would be better letting them in than to risk getting labeled racist during a future lawsuit. The end.
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: GOBUCKS on December 03, 2009, 04:44:56 PM
Kill the person(s) who let the party crashers in ?

It would probably be the best solution for the Dems, because I suspect the truth about it will do more damage.

here is my theory.

A low-level staffer went to check them in, found they weren't on the list and went to deny them access. The staffer then saw the couples surname, thought that it would be better letting them in than to risk getting labeled racist during a future lawsuit. The end.
Bingo. A muslim brother.
Title: Re: sparkling husband primitive took too many pharmaceuticals again
Post by: lastparker on December 03, 2009, 04:51:54 PM
Kill the person(s) who let the party crashers in ?

It would probably be the best solution for the Dems, because I suspect the truth about it will do more damage.

here is my theory.

A low-level staffer went to check them in, found they weren't on the list and went to deny them access. The staffer then saw the couples surname, thought that it would be better letting them in than to risk getting labeled racist during a future lawsuit. The end.

Nailed it.