The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: crockspot on October 26, 2009, 02:56:39 PM

Title: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: crockspot on October 26, 2009, 02:56:39 PM
Quote
Nikki Stone1  (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author  Click to add this author to your buddy list  Click to add this author to your Ignore list      Mon Oct-26-09 02:17 PM
Original message
I know that some of you read other boards
   
Edited on Mon Oct-26-09 02:20 PM by Nikki Stone1
One has invited me to join and I am being open about it here because I want no misunderstanding.

I am and will always be a Progressive. I am the far left of the Democratic party. I am the base. But I am being called an "Obama Hater" by some on this board because I disagree with the health care bills now before Congress. I will still remain on DU because I think the Democratic party needs its base to keep its moral compass, and I know there are a lot of progressives on this board who are with me on this. I also know that there are some centrist partisans who are not, and that's ok.

I have recently posted on that other board, and for those of you who know where it is, you may feel free to look. I have nothing to hide. I am not an Obama hater, I am still a Democrat, and I am always a progressive.

And I still think the current healthcare bills are totally wrong headed. Here is what I see happening with the healthcare debacle:

blah blah snipped a buncha libber healthcare crap nobody cares about blah blah

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6860124

Isn't this Frank's favorite new hottie? Is she talking about our board, or some loser lib board?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 26, 2009, 03:16:39 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6860124

Isn't this Frank's favorite new hottie? Is she talking about our board, or some loser lib board?

Frank! You big Dawg, you! There had better be pitures up in the NSFW section, pronto.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on October 26, 2009, 03:21:20 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6860124

Isn't this Frank's favorite new hottie? Is she talking about our board, or some loser lib board?

We've had a lib antagonist of NikkiStone posting at CU for over a year now, but I don't think she herself has joined.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 26, 2009, 03:28:02 PM
The question we must ask ourselves is not if Frank is angling for some left-slanted *****, but if Ms. NStone1 had big boobaliedoobaliez.


Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Crazy Horse on October 26, 2009, 04:11:37 PM
Boobiez................ :hyper:

Where.????????????????............ :hyper:










Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: JohnnyReb on October 26, 2009, 04:27:49 PM
DUmmie said:

 "I think the Democratic party needs its base to keep its moral compass,..."

 :rotf:....they threw that 'moral compass' away years ago.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 26, 2009, 04:33:31 PM
Yeah, that's I.

Well, in the absence--one hopes it's only a very temporary absence--of Gloria Swanson, one gets lonely.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 26, 2009, 05:35:43 PM
Yeah, that's I.

Well, in the absence--one hopes it's only a very temporary absence--of Gloria Swanson, one gets lonely.

Don't give in to temp-tation, Frank.  er...DO...DO give in to temp-tation...


and provide pics.

 :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 26, 2009, 05:46:00 PM
Don't give in to tempation, Frank.  er...DO...DO give in to tempation...


and provide pics.

 :-)

Well, despite that her politics are excresence, she is hot.

This is not to say women here aren't hot--but myself being a gentleman of probity and boundaries, if a woman is already committed to another man, no matter how good-looking she is, I have absolutely no interest in courting her.

And so one is left to survey what's left over.

As mentioned a couple of weeks ago, usually one is in pursuit of someone who has characteristics and talents one doesn't possess himself--such as the stammering Henry R. Luce winning the chatty and witty Clare Boothe Luce.

I'll bet she has a lot of the personal characteristics of Clare Boothe Luce, although the heart does ache for the temporarily-absent Gloria Swanson.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Ree on October 26, 2009, 05:50:33 PM
Well, despite that her politics are excresence, she is hot.

This is not to say women here aren't hot--but myself being a gentleman of probity and boundaries, if a woman is already committed to another man, no matter how good-looking she is, I have absolutely no interest in courting her.

And so one is left to survey what's left over.

As mentioned a couple of weeks ago, usually one is in pursuit of someone who has characteristics and talents one doesn't possess himself--such as the stammering Henry R. Luce winning the chatty and witty Clare Boothe Luce.

I'll bet she has a lot of the personal characteristics of Clare Boothe Luce, although the heart does ache for the temporarily-absent Gloria Swanson.
WTF????

Who are you and what have you done with Frank?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 26, 2009, 05:53:57 PM
Well, despite that her politics are excresence, she is hot.

This is not to say women here aren't hot--but myself being a gentleman of probity and boundaries, if a woman is already committed to another man, no matter how good-looking she is, I have absolutely no interest in courting her.

And so one is left to survey what's left over.

As mentioned a couple of weeks ago, usually one is in pursuit of someone who has characteristics and talents one doesn't possess himself--such as the stammering Henry R. Luce winning the chatty and witty Clare Boothe Luce.

I'll bet she has a lot of the personal characteristics of Clare Boothe Luce, although the heart does ache for the temporarily-absent Gloria Swanson.

Courting? Courting, Frank?  :thatsright: I was talking about banging the hell out of her and providing a night-visioned enhanced HD website link complete with beer dispenser application.

You are thinking the conquest of the Spanish Armada and I am thinking Pro-rodeo bullriding.  :naughty:

Focus, Frank. You lack FO---cus.  Ef Oh Cus. Foxytrot-Ohmywhatbigboobaliedoobaliez-Cus. :fuelfire:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: thundley4 on October 26, 2009, 06:00:24 PM
WTF????

Who are you and what have you done with Frank?

He is sounding as smitten as a kitten. 
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 26, 2009, 06:07:23 PM
He is sounding as smitten as a kitten. 

as batty as a katty?

as loopy as a ...er....poopy?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 26, 2009, 06:41:02 PM
He is sounding as smitten as a kitten. 

Well, what do you expect? The ancient DUmmy TLB, although an arrogant and hateful bitch, had coach totally beguiled, dreaming of her arid, dusty nether regions. But now she has apparently been permanently consigned to a fossil layer somewhere.

TLB caught his attention only because that treachereous soil scientist has apparently found someone with a bigger shovel to load her hog manure.

It's come down to a matter of any port in a storm, and one can only assume this Nikki DUmmy does at least offer some kind of port.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 26, 2009, 06:50:56 PM
It's come down to a matter of any port in a storm, and one can only assume this Nikki DUmmy does at least offer some kind of port.

Well, yeah, sure; continuing my never-errant policy of blunt honesty, that's it.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: delilahmused on October 26, 2009, 06:55:08 PM
Well, yeah, sure; continuing my never-errant policy of blunt honesty, that's it.

I'm jealous.

Cindie
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: thundley4 on October 26, 2009, 06:58:11 PM
Here's the site (http://oldelmtree.com/discussion/index.php) that Darling Nikki was referring to in the thread OP.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 26, 2009, 06:59:30 PM
I'm jealous.

But madam, you know how I feel, especially since we know each other off the internet, and go back a very long time.

For the record, if anyone is nosy enough to read this, delilah is remarkable in her charm, her wit, her effervescence, her pulchtritude.  I was very happy when delilah decided to come here, from our old home.

However, you're already taken by a gentleman who takes good care of you, and franksolich can't possibly match that.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 26, 2009, 07:00:28 PM
Here's the site (http://oldelmtree.com/discussion/index.php) that Darling Nikki was referring to in the thread OP.

Oh damn.

Damn.

Damn it.

So Clare Boothe Luce hasn't in fact noticed franksolich yet.

I guess I'll have to keep trying.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 26, 2009, 07:42:02 PM
The site Miss DUmmy Hot Pants is posting on is as much a loony bin as the DUmp, maybe nuttier. It seems to be a bunch of DUmmies, with the added insanity of treating troofers with respect. At least Skimmer trundles them off to a corner of the island that's sort of hard to find.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Crazy Horse on October 26, 2009, 07:43:31 PM
Here's the site (http://oldelmtree.com/discussion/index.php) that Darling Nikki was referring to in the thread OP.

It's like a whole board of the dungeon :lmao:

Shit even moonbats call those people ****ing crazy :thatsright:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Ree on October 26, 2009, 07:55:17 PM



The site Miss DUmmy Hot Pants is posting on is as much a loony bin as the DUmp, maybe nuttier. It seems to be a bunch of DUmmies, with the added insanity of treating troofers with respect. At least Skimmer trundles them off to a corner of the island that's sort of hard to find.
But the fights are funny
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dandi on October 26, 2009, 08:53:52 PM
May I suggest...


(http://i923.photobucket.com/albums/ad77/dandi56/31cgACmoxL_SL500_AA280_.jpg)



"Sixty percent of the time, it works all the time."
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Chris_ on October 26, 2009, 09:23:21 PM
May I suggest...


(http://i923.photobucket.com/albums/ad77/dandi56/31cgACmoxL_SL500_AA280_.jpg)



"Sixty percent of the time, it works all the time."

The rest of the time, it's a Subway Kitty attractant.  :puke:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on October 26, 2009, 09:31:15 PM
Courting? Courting, Frank?  :thatsright: I was talking about banging the hell out of her and providing a night-visioned enhanced HD website link complete with beer dispenser application.

You are thinking the conquest of the Spanish Armada and I am thinking Pro-rodeo bullriding.  :naughty:

Focus, Frank. You lack FO---cus.  Ef Oh Cus. Foxytrot-Ohmywhatbigboobaliedoobaliez-Cus. :fuelfire:



Being a woman.....I know I should probably be  ::) :uhsure: ::) over these comments....however all I could do was
 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: DixieBelle on October 26, 2009, 09:41:16 PM
Here's the site (http://oldelmtree.com/discussion/index.php) that Darling Nikki was referring to in the thread OP.
oh my...so that's where all of the nuts go.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 27, 2009, 03:38:06 PM
Oh, no, no, no, Franklin J. Wanttahottie. I am not going to allow you to post thirty threads to the DUmp just to bury this one.

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on October 27, 2009, 03:40:06 PM
Oh, no, no, no, Franklin J. Wanttahottie. I am not going to allow you to post thirty threads to the DUmp just to bury this one.



 :lmao:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: DixieBelle on October 27, 2009, 03:40:18 PM
:rofl:

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on October 27, 2009, 03:56:08 PM
So what does this Nikki chick look like?

And no, Dutch's bogus pic thread in SB won't suffice.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 27, 2009, 03:59:38 PM
So what does this Nikki chick look like?

And no, Dutch's bogus pic thread in SB won't suffice.

Those are NOT bogus pics. They are both pics I found whilst hunting for Franklin's "Who"ochiemomma.

However- the one Nikki Stone I did find was an olympian athlete. Way too ugly for Frank's taste...IMHO.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 27, 2009, 04:02:32 PM
So what does this Nikki chick look like?

And no, Dutch's bogus pic thread in SB won't suffice.

I'm guessing, based upon the portrait of herself that Clare Boothe Luce paints with her words: early or mid-30s, maybe about 5'8", size 3 dress, blonde, svelte and thin, long slender fingers, aquiline nose, light blue eyes, well-backgrounded and well-educated, and most importantly comes from money.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 27, 2009, 04:04:44 PM
And plays tennis, too.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: thundley4 on October 27, 2009, 04:06:49 PM
Any idea where nikki stone1 is from?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 27, 2009, 04:09:13 PM
Any idea where nikki stone1 is from?


I believe the New York City area, if I remember correctly from when Clare Boothe Luce showed up at our old home.

It may sound preposterous, a chick from New York City and a guy from the Sandhills of Nebraska, but remember my own background.  Even though I'm a 100% Nebraska product, the parents and the siblings were all New Yorkers, and so inevitably there's some "New York" in me.

I think it'd be a pretty good match.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: lastparker on October 27, 2009, 04:54:25 PM
I just stumbled upon this thread, read it in its entirety, and I just can't get this image out of my head.....

(http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h141/phobucketforcu/walkensnl.jpg)
“Would you care for a glass of champagne? I knew you would. I knew you enjoy champagne. How do I know this? Because I love women. I can read women’s mail, I MEAN, mind.”


SNL - Christopher Walken - The Continental

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: AllosaursRus on October 27, 2009, 06:03:49 PM
The rest of the time, it's a Subway Kitty attractant.  :puke:

Uh, I think I'll pass! Just in the off chance it could atract a subway zombie!
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 27, 2009, 07:16:56 PM
DUmmie women might be easy but they come with lots of bugs, germs and Montezuma's revenge
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: BEG on October 27, 2009, 07:26:56 PM
DUmmie women might be easy but they come with lots of bugs, germs and Montezuma's revenge

Made me laugh.... :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 27, 2009, 07:27:28 PM
I'm guessing, based upon the portrait of herself that Clare Boothe Luce paints with her words: early or mid-30s, maybe about 5'8", size 3 dress, blonde, svelte and thin, long slender fingers, aquiline nose, light blue eyes, well-backgrounded and well-educated, and most importantly comes from money.

More proof, if anyone needed it, that coach is the consummate gentleman. In this post, he describes his dream girl, with nary a mention of the anatomical details to which nearly all men, including consummate gentlemen, attach the highest priority. (Unless there is some obscure erotic definition of "well-backgrounded".)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 27, 2009, 07:46:23 PM
Made me laugh.... :-)

and hammertoes?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 27, 2009, 07:55:00 PM
More proof, if anyone needed it, that coach is the consummate gentleman. In this post, he describes his dream girl, with nary a mention of the anatomical details to which nearly all men, including consummate gentlemen, attach the highest priority. (Unless there is some obscure erotic definition of "well-backgrounded".)

Well now, I did mention that Clare Boothe Luce apparently comes from Money.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 27, 2009, 07:59:31 PM
Well now, I did mention that Clare Boothe Luce apparently comes from Money.

I don't think that is what he meant. I am trying to read the tea-leaves but I believe he meant physical attributes. You did say size-3, so his statement is a bit confusing to me. Do you think he was talking about big feet or maybe big hair?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 27, 2009, 08:34:26 PM
I don't think that is what he meant. I am trying to read the tea-leaves but I believe he meant physical attributes. You did say size-3, so his statement is a bit confusing to me. Do you think he was talking about big feet or maybe big hair?

For franksolich, money is an important anatomical detail.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 27, 2009, 09:39:04 PM
For franksolich, money is an important anatomical detail.

 :rotf:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 27, 2009, 09:59:06 PM
For franksolich, money is an important anatomical detail.
That is so true. Enough money will offset any anatomical shortcoming. Far more effective than beer goggles.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on October 27, 2009, 10:43:34 PM
I'm guessing, based upon the portrait of herself that Clare Boothe Luce paints with her words: early or mid-30s, maybe about 5'8", size 3 dress, blonde, svelte and thin, long slender fingers, aquiline nose, light blue eyes, well-backgrounded and well-educated, and most importantly comes from money.


5'8" and a size 3?

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


My daughter is a stick at 5'8' (when she is not pregnant - which she will be for the next 9 hours :-) ) and she is not a 3....she is about a 4 or a 6.

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 28, 2009, 12:10:58 PM

5'8" and a size 3?

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


My daughter is a stick at 5'8' (when she is not pregnant - which she will be for the next 9 hours :-) ) and she is not a 3....she is about a 4 or a 6.



Maybe Franklin is talking about O-ring size ...
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 28, 2009, 12:20:26 PM
 :loser: (and don't think I didn't notice you've taken this off sticky)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 28, 2009, 07:14:23 PM
stop trying to bury the truth, Frank...
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on October 28, 2009, 07:20:17 PM
stop trying to bury the truth, Frank...

I don't think that's what he's trying to bury....
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 28, 2009, 07:32:25 PM
I think he wants this thread to sink off the first page.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 29, 2009, 03:47:11 PM
I think he wants this thread to sink off the first page.

(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sarhaus/MapsAndTimelines/Fall2007/Sulaka/Bush_files/Bush.jpg)

Read my lips: Not gonna happen.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Karin on October 29, 2009, 03:56:18 PM
I need to catch up on this thread. 

DebK, did your daughter have a baby??!!!   (When you get back eventually.  We'll keep the thread going so you find us.) :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on October 29, 2009, 03:58:50 PM
I need to catch up on this thread. 

DebK, did your daughter have a baby??!!!   (When you get back eventually.  We'll keep the thread going so you find us.) :-)



Yes.....yesterday morn by planned c-section.

Madelyn Kate....7lb.9oz....

Thanks for asking....

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 29, 2009, 03:59:15 PM
I need to catch up on this thread. 

DebK, did your daughter have a baby??!!!   (When you get back eventually.  We'll keep the thread going so you find us.) :-)

Yeah, debk, who's far too young to be a grandmother, is the grandmother of a healthy circa 8 pounds baby infant girl.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Alpha Mare on October 29, 2009, 04:02:51 PM

5'8" and a size 3?

 :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:


My daughter is a stick at 5'8' (when she is not pregnant - which she will be for the next 9 hours :-) ) and she is not a 3....she is about a 4 or a 6.


I am 5'9" and size 2.  Was size 0 til I hit 40.  When I was pregnant,I looked like a toothpick with a knot in it.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on October 29, 2009, 04:08:38 PM
I am 5'9" and size 2.  Was size 0 til I hit 40.  When I was pregnant,I looked like a toothpick with a knot in it.


That's the way my daughter is...she normally weighs 115-120.

I was 97lb when I got pregnant with her.....weighed in at 176 for delivery. I'm 5'4" on a tall day. I looked like a gigantic beach ball was under by tight maternity top... :(
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 29, 2009, 04:10:04 PM

That's the way my daughter is...she normally weighs 115-120.

I was 97lb when I got pregnant with her.....weighed in at 176 for delivery. I'm 5'4" on a tall day. I looked like a gigantic beach ball was under by tight maternity top... :(

Whoa.

You gained 79 pounds during pregnancy?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 29, 2009, 04:13:54 PM
I am 5'9" and size 2.  Was size 0 til I hit 40.  When I was pregnant,I looked like a toothpick with a knot in it.

You know, I've noticed women don't get pregnant like they used to.

Nowadays some women are 8, 9, months along and one doesn't even notice it.

When I was a little lad, I used to notice that women 2, 3, months along had already acquired a front shelf onto which one could park a portable television set.

One wonders what's up with that.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on October 29, 2009, 04:20:40 PM
Whoa.

You gained 79 pounds during pregnancy?


Yeah....we moved 6 wks before she was born so the ex could do a surgery rotation at the VA Hospital in Roanoke VA. I had nothing to do but sit around for 6 wks, eat and feel sorry for myself. There was a chocolate chip cookie factory on the way home from the doctor's office that I was going to 2x's a week.  :uhsure:

I was back in my regular clothes at my 6wk checkup.

I gained 65 with my second one...but he was a couple of weeks early.

It took me 2 months to lose the weight that time.

I really didn't like being pregnant....I had to eat about every two hours or I would faint. It was quite annoying.

At least I didn't any stretch marks.

The reason you can't tell if women are pregnant as easily as it used to be is because early maternity clothes look so nice these days.

When I was pregnant with mine 28, 30 years ago....everything was ruffles, polkadots and plaids. All 3 of which should be illegal to use in the making of maternity clothes.  :censored:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 29, 2009, 05:37:11 PM
You know, I've noticed women don't get pregnant like they used to.

I'm pretty sure they are still getting pregnant the same way they always have.
Thank goodness.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 29, 2009, 09:18:27 PM
(http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sarhaus/MapsAndTimelines/Fall2007/Sulaka/Bush_files/Bush.jpg)

Read my lips: Not gonna happen.
It's easy to forget what a fine leader Bush41 was. Oh, to have such a man in the White House today.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 29, 2009, 09:27:22 PM
stop trying to bury the truth, Frank...

Oh now, you know that as a moderator, I can do anything I want to do, with this thread.

I can, for example, shift it to a forum with less traffic.

I can, for another example, re-title it even though I'm not the original poster.

Or I can send the whole thing to the garbage bin.

However, not to fear; franksolich is a nice guy, one of the nicest guys one can hope to meet, and doesn't believe in tampering with history.  What is written, is written.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on October 30, 2009, 12:36:21 PM
Frank's current lust intrest, Nikki Stone, has this to say:

Quote
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts)     Thu Oct-29-09 07:03 PM
crap+Original message (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=6885731&mesg_id=6885731)
The "Public Option" has been a red herring all along, to divert you from the real issue: MANDATES
 Advertisements [?]Edited on Thu Oct-29-09 07:20 PM by Nikki Stone1
I tried to say this before and was called an Obama hater--that didn't hurt my feelings at all, but it does show how difficult it is to get some people to face facts.

In my thread two days ago, I said that what we would get was a watered-down public option that would, most likely, be a fig leaf and pretty useless against the insurance companies and Big Pharma. That's looks like exactly what we are getting.

The key to this bill was MANDATES: Is it right to expect that everyone be required BY LAW to buy a faulty product from an insurance company just for the privilege of breathing in the US? Everyone said, "Oh we buy car insurance" but I pointed out in my thread here

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.ph...

I only have to buy liability in most states, and I can choose the car I want to insure: old or new, cheap or expensive, and have some control over what I pay. I can also choose to have no car at all.

BUT MANDATES FOR HEALTH INSURANCE ARE DIFFERENT.

The debate over the so-called public option has always been a red herring. Its purpose, night after night, on Rachel or Keith or other news shows, has been to shift the focus to a relatively unimportant part of the bill (at least as far as Congress was concerned, since they planned to tank whatever good it could do anyway) and to take our focus away from the big shock of MANDATES.

Remember, the first thing we all reacted to in the Baucus bill was the mandates. Suddenly, middle class people who are just over the line in terms of income but who are struggling nonetheless are being REQUIRED to add another big budget item BY LAW.

And yes, it's big budget. I went to the Massachusetts health care website and signed in as a family of 4 living in Boston with both parents in their late 30s and two kids, making 67,000 year. Here were my results.

All include prescription drugs.

Bronze plan: deductibles and co-pay necessary: $823.31 - $1,176.00/mo (PER MONTH, folks)

Silver plan: Moderate co-pay. Some deductible maybe. $1,037.65 - $1,690.00/mo

Gold Plan: Low co-pay. No deductible. $1,520.98 - $2,166.00/mo

(Edited to add: Take home pay for this family of four, taking out Federal Income Tax, is about $4000/month. They are required to spend 1/4 to 1/2 of that now on health insurance.)

So what will end up with, ladies and gentlemen, is a LAW that will require us to put aside $1,000-$2000 extra per month (on average) ASIDE for health care--edited to add: not health care, health INSURANCE. Health care costs are on top of that.

If you are making 66K with two kids and two parents and you live in a major metro area like Boston, do you have an extra 1 or 2 GRAND per month to give to the insurance companies?

Now, yes, there is a Commonwealth Care program for people under certain limits. If I make 65K with a spouse and 2 kids, I can apply for that. So far, I have been having a hard time actually figuring out how to navigate the online links. There are some places in MA which only have one company servicing these health needs. In general, though, the health plan is listed here

(If you can figure out how to get quotes for this, the zip code I used was 02116)

At any rate, the Baucus plan was always a giveaway to the insurance companies. The public option drew our focus AWAY from the travesty of mandates to a fight over something that was only going to be a fig leaf.


Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 30, 2009, 12:48:33 PM
Is that true? Someone should check out the RomneyCare site and use her zip code, which she graciously provided and find out.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Karin on October 30, 2009, 12:55:20 PM
She's right.  It's a huge chunk of change.  People simply can't do that.  What are these miserable creeps in congress thinking?  DUmmies should join us in the streets. 
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 30, 2009, 12:57:53 PM
She's right.  It's a huge chunk of change.  People simply can't do that.  What are these miserable creeps in congress thinking?  DUmmies should join us in the streets. 

Well... I'm poor... so thank you guys for my future health insurance coverage.  :bow:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Karin on October 30, 2009, 03:48:30 PM
Does Nikki's post above mean she's married with 2 kids?  Or was she just being hypothetical?  Ya know, she's not the most egregious person over there.  She gets all passionate about some moonbat causes, like the music professors who are going to have to teach the instruments again after 20 years.  But also serious ones, like sex traffiking. 

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 30, 2009, 03:50:59 PM
Does Nikki's post above mean she's married with 2 kids?  Or was she just being hypothetical?  Ya know, she's not the most egregious person over there.  She gets all passionate about some moonbat causes, like the music professors who are going to have to teach the instruments again after 20 years.  But also serious ones, like sex traffiking. 



Maybe she is passionate about it because she was once traffcked? Maybe she was born in Russia, Lithuania, Euthanasia or some other Euro-Splat! nation and was kidnapped or tricked as a young woman.... ya never know I guess.  :innocent:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Randy on October 30, 2009, 04:19:10 PM
Maybe she is passionate about it because she was once traffcked? Maybe she was born in Russia, Lithuania, Euthanasia or some other Euro-Splat! nation and was kidnapped or tricked as a young woman.... ya never know I guess.  :innocent:


Oh....I think I've seen her website....

 :-)









Sorry Frank, I couldn't resist the joke.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: vesta111 on October 30, 2009, 05:39:10 PM
If Frank wants a woman who thinks ,he may wake up in bed with Elinor Roosevelt or Gloria Stinenam.

Now, would he would be better off with Sally Rand or Barbara Bush.  His choice.

 If Frank could go back in time I pick Dolly Madison.  Brave, courageous and a lusty broad.

Perhaps he could get an answer to,  did the British actually burn up the books at the Library of Congress or were they hidden so [You Know Who ] could donate his library and pay off his debts.

Seems like every 50 years or so one of those priceless books that was though to have been lost turn up at auction somewhere in the world.

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: miskie on October 30, 2009, 06:14:55 PM
If Frank wants a woman who thinks ,he may wake up in bed with Elinor Roosevelt or Gloria Stinenam.

Now, would he would be better off with Sally Rand or Barbara Bush.  His choice.

 If Frank could go back in time I pick Dolly Madison.  Brave, courageous and a lusty broad.

Perhaps he could get an answer to,  did the British actually burn up the books at the Library of Congress or were they hidden so [You Know Who ] could donate his library and pay off his debts.

Seems like every 50 years or so one of those priceless books that was though to have been lost turn up at auction somewhere in the world.



Vesta, I like you, seriously - So don't take this the wrong way. If there was ever a person alive who could perfectly represent what non sequitur means, it would be you. Seth MacFarlane should hire you as a writer for Family Guy.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 30, 2009, 08:09:00 PM
Vesta, I like you, seriously - So don't take this the wrong way. If there was ever a person alive who could perfectly represent what non sequitur means, it would be you. Seth MacFarlane should hire you as a writer for Family Guy.

There is no way on earth you would ever be able to explain the meaning of "non sequitur" to vestanumbers, even though vestanumbers IS a non sequitur.

I cannot see comments by vestanumbers unless someone quotes them. Thankfully, that rarely happens. Whenever it does, though, it reminds me of how grateful I am for the "ignore" option.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Schadenfreude on October 30, 2009, 08:26:45 PM
Whoa.

You gained 79 pounds during pregnancy?

LOL... I hit 200 pounds with each kid and I dropped the weight within 2 months of having each of my babies. I don't know, I guess I retained mega-water.

I am now 115 and I consider that my normal weight, though I feel best at 110.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: vesta111 on October 31, 2009, 06:17:47 AM
There is no way on earth you would ever be able to explain the meaning of "non sequitur" to vestanumbers, even though vestanumbers IS a non sequitur.

I cannot see comments by vestanumbers unless someone quotes them. Thankfully, that rarely happens. Whenever it does, though, it reminds me of how grateful I am for the "ignore" option.

Well since Gobucks will never see this post, what on earth is he talking about. I am French you know so I as all French Woman are to a point described as" non sequitur" in some fashion or other. What the heck even we French woman tend to confuse each other.

I hope Gobucks stays out of New Orleans, in the 1700 the most educated and desirable woman were the French mixed blood who were mistresses to men of wealth.They were the darling of Boston society, and took Europe by storm, it might break Gobucks heart to find out the French educated their woman. The wives of the men of wealth could barely read or write and were oh so conventional so proper and correct for that time.

The Mistresses could hold their own with any man on politics or world affairs, they demanded the best from those that desired them and were received with respect.

Give me a break, I will just bumble along knowing  that my Heritage is from the culture that did not bent to convention.

Why is it I have a visual of Carol Bernet wearing a curtain rod as Scarlot and Harvey Corman as Rhett.?

Gobucks has no sence of adventure or a sense of humor. :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Schadenfreude on October 31, 2009, 08:02:51 AM
Well since Gobucks will never see this post, what on earth is he talking about. I am French you know so I as all French Woman are to a point described as" non sequitur" in some fashion or other. What the heck even we French woman tend to confuse each other.

I hope Gobucks stays out of New Orleans, in the 1700 the most educated and desirable woman were the French mixed blood who were mistresses to men of wealth.They were the darling of Boston society, and took Europe by storm, it might break Gobucks heart to find out the French educated their woman. The wives of the men of wealth could barely read or write and were oh so conventional so proper and correct for that time.

The Mistresses could hold their own with any man on politics or world affairs, they demanded the best from those that desired them and were received with respect.

Give me a break, I will just bumble along knowing  that my Heritage is from the culture that did not bent to convention.

Why is it I have a visual of Carol Bernet wearing a curtain rod as Scarlot and Harvey Corman as Rhett.?

Gobucks has no sence of adventure or a sense of humor. :tongue: :tongue: :tongue:



I'm sorry but this post must be quoted for posterity and sheer quirky value.  :lmao:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: IassaFTots on October 31, 2009, 08:08:35 AM
I'm sorry but this post must be quoted for posterity and sheer quirky value.  :lmao:


Seconded.   :II:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: crockspot on October 31, 2009, 09:51:26 AM
Vesta, can you please post some naked pictures of yourself? I must know if you are hot.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 31, 2009, 11:40:28 AM
I'm sorry but this post must be quoted for posterity and sheer quirky value.  :lmao:

I don't know if I should feel proud or embarrassed to have inspired that mess. I'm leaning strongly in the direction of humiliation.
It's another vestanumbers post that should serve as a warning to parents everywhere: If you ever drop your baby on its head, get immediate treatment.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Schadenfreude on October 31, 2009, 01:47:10 PM
Vesta, can you please post some naked pictures of yourself? I must know if you are hot.

I have a feeling she is "quirky" hot, just like me.  :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 31, 2009, 03:28:27 PM
I'd  like to know the record for "most views without a sticky".
A naked picture of vestanumbers would surely put this one over the top.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 31, 2009, 03:29:41 PM
I have a feeling she is "quirky" hot, just like me.

vesta's okay; you can take my word on it.

We all have our quirks.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 31, 2009, 03:33:59 PM
vesta's okay; you can take my word on it.

We all have our quirks.

Coach's trolling apparently has no limits.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 31, 2009, 03:35:58 PM
Coach's trolling apparently has no limits.

 :rotf:

scratching post
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 31, 2009, 03:54:47 PM
Coach's trolling apparently has no limits.

Well now, I'm just trying to point out the good.

After all, this is another record-breaking month for conservativecave, and I want the trend to continue.  One way that it continues is by handling each member here as if a beautiful but fragile and rare flower.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 31, 2009, 03:56:59 PM
Well now, I'm just trying to point out the good.

After all, this is another record-breaking month for conservativecave, and I want the trend to continue.  One way that it continues is by handling each member here as if a beautiful but fragile and rare flower.

I'll concede "rare".
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 31, 2009, 04:01:26 PM
I'll concede "rare".

Now, I have no idea, no idea, what vesta actually looks like, but this is the self-portrait of herself that vesta "paints" with her words:

Circa late 30s, early 40s, small slender woman, good-looking, has endured some hard knocks in life and hasn't quite gotten back her equilibrium, but trying.  Once vesta gets steadied, I have all the confidence that she's be a valuable contributor to this site, and won't be on anybody's "ignore" list. 

It's a "growing" thing.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Chris on October 31, 2009, 04:30:55 PM
Now, I have no idea, no idea, what vesta actually looks like, but this is the self-portrait of herself that vesta "paints" with her words:

Circa late 30s, early 40s, small slender woman, good-looking, has endured some hard knocks in life and hasn't quite gotten back her equilibrium, but trying.  Once vesta gets steadied, I have all the confidence that she's be a valuable contributor to this site, and won't be on anybody's "ignore" list. 

It's a "growing" thing.

Really.  I sorta imagined the crazy cat lady from The Simpsons, only with internet access.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on October 31, 2009, 04:34:22 PM
Really.  I sorta imagined the crazy cat lady from The Simpsons, only with internet access.

There doesn't appear to be any similarities, none whatsoever, between our vesta on one hand, and the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive or the defrocked warped primitive or the Joanne98 primitive, on Skins's island.

Those, I consider crazy ladies of the axe-wielding type.

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 31, 2009, 05:00:04 PM
That is a very dignified looking cat in your Avatar
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on October 31, 2009, 06:55:33 PM
There doesn't appear to be any similarities, none whatsoever, between our vesta on one hand, and the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive or the defrocked warped primitive or the Joanne98 primitive, on Skins's island.

Those, I consider crazy ladies of the axe-wielding type.
I agree. There are fundamental differences. While DUmmies cali and Joanne98 are far more articulate and coherent than vestanumbers, they're also vicious and deranged. Vestanumbers is simply addled to such an extent that it's a disability.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: thundley4 on November 01, 2009, 04:06:34 AM
I agree. There are fundamental differences. While DUmmies cali and Joanne98 are far more articulate and coherent than vestanumbers, they're also vicious and deranged. Vestanumbers is simply addled to such an extent that it's a disability.

Most of the females on Skin's Island are vicious, vindictive and deranged.



Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on November 01, 2009, 07:58:37 AM
vesta's okay; you can take my word on it.

We all have our quirks.

DAWG!

come on, Frank...we need to change your code name to Franklin J "Horndawg" Solich.

"Negitive Horndawg, the pattern is full."
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on November 01, 2009, 08:14:06 AM
Well now, consider vesta as one considers the late Lucille Ball.

On television, the late Lucille Ball was a dingbat.

In real life, the late Lucille Ball was one very shrewd and smart woman.

It's possible--nay, probable--that most see only the first half of this, when it comes to vesta.

franksolich sees both halves.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Schadenfreude on November 01, 2009, 08:40:22 AM
Well now, consider vesta as one considers the late Lucille Ball.

On television, the late Lucille Ball was a dingbat.

In real life, the late Lucille Ball was one very shrewd and smart woman.

It's possible--nay, probable--that most see only the first half of this, when it comes to vesta.

franksolich sees both halves.

I do believe that vesta is grinning as she pens her responses. There is an engaging quality about her and she is not in the least combative. I like her. She gets the Schadenfreude stamp of approval.... of course everyone around here does (except for utterly obnoxious and smug lefties who come here and tell us how smart they think they are).
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: bkg on November 01, 2009, 09:11:09 AM
I do believe that vesta is grinning as she pens her responses. There is an engaging quality about her and she is not in the least combative. I like her. She gets the Schadenfreude stamp of approval.... of course everyone around here does (except for utterly obnoxious and smug lefties who come here and tell us how smart they think they are).

What about us overly confident libertarians?  :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Schadenfreude on November 01, 2009, 09:17:47 AM
What about us overly confident libertarians?  :-)

There are both style and execution elements which are a part of my evaluation of you.  You're not doing so bad kiddo. Yes, I am watching.  :-)


Besides, I give extra points for Minnesota homies.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: bkg on November 01, 2009, 09:29:48 AM
There are both style and execution elements which are a part of my evaluation of you.  You're not doing so bad kiddo. Yes, I am watching.  :-)


Besides, I give extra points for Minnesota homies.

I haven't been called kiddo in... probably 25 years! I'm totally taking it as a compliment. :blowkiss:

Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on November 01, 2009, 09:32:27 AM
Well now, consider vesta as one considers the late Lucille Ball.

On television, the late Lucille Ball was a dingbat.

In real life, the late Lucille Ball was one very shrewd and smart woman.

It's possible--nay, probable--that most see only the first half of this, when it comes to vesta.

franksolich sees both halves.

I think I'll stick with addled to the point of disability.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Schadenfreude on November 01, 2009, 09:46:24 AM
I think I'll stick with addled to the point of disability.

LOL....  :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: vesta111 on November 01, 2009, 01:00:24 PM
You know, I've noticed women don't get pregnant like they used to.

Nowadays some women are 8, 9, months along and one doesn't even notice it.

When I was a little lad, I used to notice that women 2, 3, months along had already acquired a front shelf onto which one could park a portable television set.

One wonders what's up with that.

I suggest it is the changing trends in health care and the fads that come and go.

My 4 were all under 5 pounds at birth, I was encouraged to gain no more then 15 lbs.

There were ash trays in the doctors waiting rooms and after our once monthly doctors visit we who had met and became acquainted in the waiting room would head for the club to down a few beers.

For those of us who felt tired and out of sorts we were given some kind of [speed]  to pep us up, one could tell if there was a Prego living in any place in Navy Housing, we were the woman waxing the drive way at 3 AM.  So much energy , wow.

Today the pendelem has swung the other way, no smoking or drinking, as few medications as possible for the mother.  Depending on bone structure, mothers are not faulted for gaining a few pounds, 7-8 pound baby's are healthier then a 4 ponder.

Clothing styles have changed, woman wear those awful T. shirts untucked just hanging there, hard to tell on some big boned woman, are they Prego or just sloppy looking.  Does she have a beer belly or a baby under that shirt.?

Heres a back in time for you Frank, remember when it was not unusual to see a woman out shopping with curlers in their hair.?



Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: AllosaursRus on November 02, 2009, 12:20:59 AM
Ya know, I have faith the Coach could turn a libby chick into a conservative in........oh, about 20 minutes.

After all, he won't have to listen to their BS!
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Karin on November 02, 2009, 09:52:25 AM
I'm not sure what mess is going on here, but I do have to take exception to one of the things Vesta said.  She said Gobucks has no sense of humor.  Strongly disagree, he makes me laugh ALL THE TIME. 

Allosaurus said what we were all thinking.  At least Frank wouldn't have to listen to the commie chicks.   :-)
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: dutch508 on November 02, 2009, 10:01:27 AM
I'm not sure what mess is going on here, but I do have to take exception to one of the things Vesta said.  She said Gobucks has no sense of humor.  Strongly disagree, he makes me laugh ALL THE TIME. 

Allosaurus said what we were all thinking.  At least Frank wouldn't have to listen to the commie chicks.   :-)

stop looking at his penis.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on November 02, 2009, 12:35:00 PM
stop looking at his penis.

 :o :o :o
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: AllosaursRus on November 02, 2009, 12:48:04 PM
:o :o :o

I agree! that was totally uncalled for. Conservatives don't have to look at anything except the ecstasy in our partners eyes. Never had any complaints, and I doubt the Coach has either. Lol!

(ETA) As a matter of fact, I'm a little jealous of Frank, as they say one's other senses are nore acute when you are lacking one. Hmmmmmmm........he could have a real advantage!
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: debk on November 02, 2009, 12:57:57 PM
I agree! that was totally uncalled for. Conservatives don't have to look at anything except the ecstasy in our partners eyes. Never had any complaints, and I doubt the Coach has either. Lol!

(ETA) As a matter of fact, I'm a little jealous of Frank, as they say one's other senses are nore acute when you are lacking one. Hmmmmmmm........he could have a real advantage!


 :lalala:













  :naughty:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on November 08, 2009, 12:58:54 PM
I was out of town a few days and missed this thread as it sank beneath the waves.
Is coach canoodling with vestanumbers now, or is he still sniffing that strong DUmmy aroma?
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: franksolich on November 08, 2009, 06:19:12 PM
I was out of town a few days and missed this thread as it sank beneath the waves.
Is coach canoodling with vestanumbers now, or is he still sniffing that strong DUmmy aroma?

While you were gone, Clare Boothe Luce got demoted to the Bella Abzug primitive.

I had an opportunity to check more comments, and was disheartened to see that the Nikki Stone1 primitive was not all I had thought her to be, thus her demotion.

Since all the conservative chicks are taken, and since Gloria Swanson remains MIA, I'm uncommitted again.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: jtyangel on November 08, 2009, 06:27:59 PM
Well now, consider vesta as one considers the late Lucille Ball.

On television, the late Lucille Ball was a dingbat.

In real life, the late Lucille Ball was one very shrewd and smart woman.

It's possible--nay, probable--that most see only the first half of this, when it comes to vesta.

franksolich sees both halves.

It is this time that I get to agree with your observation, frank. I do believe this to be spot on! :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: The Village Idiot on November 08, 2009, 07:12:21 PM
While you were gone, Clare Boothe Luce got demoted to the Bella Abzug primitive.

I had an opportunity to check more comments, and was disheartened to see that the Nikki Stone1 primitive was not all I had thought her to be, thus her demotion.

Since all the conservative chicks are taken, and since Gloria Swanson remains MIA, I'm uncommitted again.

She's not the primitive gal you thought you knew.... under that bus
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: GOBUCKS on November 08, 2009, 09:35:06 PM
While you were gone, Clare Boothe Luce got demoted to the Bella Abzug primitive.

I had an opportunity to check more comments, and was disheartened to see that the Nikki Stone1 primitive was not all I had thought her to be, thus her demotion.

Since all the conservative chicks are taken, and since Gloria Swanson remains MIA, I'm uncommitted again.

Yeah, pickings seem extraordinarily thin. Even UGP claims to be taken, although by a blue-haired gayboy. There is DUmmy Ladyhawke, of course. Crazy as a bat, and suicidal, she might fit the bill. A good candidate,  since about the time you started to tire of her, she'd likely put her head in the oven.

Come to think of it,  that's another argument in favor of gas ranges.
Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: vesta111 on November 10, 2009, 03:37:19 AM
I was out of town a few days and missed this thread as it sank beneath the waves.
Is coach canoodling with vestanumbers now, or is he still sniffing that strong DUmmy aroma?

Interesting idea GoBucks, I could come up with a buntting board 12 inches high so Frank would not kick me in the Ass every 20 minutes.

But, what happens in the morning, both of us looking our worse, Frank has to get up, look at me and go pee or poop depending on how bad I look that day. 

Then the big debate, who makes breakfast---who feeds the cats---

So at the end of a very uncomfortable day with both of us looking at each other out the corner of our eyes climb back in bed and install the bunting board.

Frank throws over on my side a report of Macedonian art work and I respond with ANSI rock paintings.

Thank heavens for the bunting board, without it we would be either punching out each others lights or laughing our Ass off.





Title: Re: Frank, are you trolling for lib chicks?
Post by: Karin on November 10, 2009, 07:51:40 AM
I have never seen such a talent for bonfire dousing.