The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: Alpha Mare on October 03, 2009, 07:20:13 PM

Title: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Alpha Mare on October 03, 2009, 07:20:13 PM
Quote
UN warns of 70 percent desertification by 2025
(AFP) – 6 hours ago

BUENOS AIRES — Drought could parch close to 70 percent of the planet's soil by 2025 unless countries implement policies to slow desertification, a senior United Nations official has warned.

"If we cannot find a solution to this problem... in 2025, close to 70 percent could be affected," Luc Gnacadja, executive secretary of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, said Friday.

Drought currently affects at least 41 percent of the planet and environmental degradation has caused it to spike by 15 to 25 percent since 1990, according to a global climate report.

"There will not be global security without food security" in dry regions, Gnacadja said at the start of the ninth UN conference on the convention in the Argentine capital.

"A green deal is necessary" for developing countries working to combat drought, he stressed.The next meeting on the convention is scheduled to take place in South Korea in 2010.


http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gpEL4aRMhxPRfbFmtV6ZY701wmFQ


Not to woory, I'm sure our current administration will be more than happy to foot the bill.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Eupher on October 03, 2009, 07:29:49 PM
I love this kind of stuff.

The U.N. is in the business of creating catastrophes, without which it would fold.

Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Deuce on October 03, 2009, 08:59:44 PM
Seems to me that water would be more helpful...
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: bkg on October 04, 2009, 09:18:24 PM
I love this kind of stuff.

The U.N. is in the business of creating catastrophes, without which it would fold.



Don't forget that SLG and Feds are also in the same business, supported by the media.

I've often wondered what would happen in this country if we didn't have a "crisis" for a year.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: ColonialMarine0431 on October 04, 2009, 09:50:35 PM
Lets see...

In the 70's we were told that there would be a new ice age in a decade.

Didn't happen.

In the 80's we were told that the ozone would be gone in a decade, and that we'd all be dying from solar radiation.

Didn't happen.

In the 90's we were told that global warming would flood the cities in a decade.

Didn't happen.

Now global warming has been re-named "climate change". I wonder what the next chicken little scare will be.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 04, 2009, 10:52:15 PM
Don't forget that SLG and Feds are also in the same business, supported by the media.

I've often wondered what would happen in this country if we didn't have a "crisis" for a year.

I doubt it would happen. If the government didn't invent one the media would manufacture one.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: JohnnyReb on October 05, 2009, 07:14:43 AM

Now global warming has been re-named "climate change". I wonder what the next chicken little scare will be.

Hell fire and brimstone brought on by Christians praying.......or nuclear war brought on by the Muslims.....and both will be blamed on Bush.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Alpha Mare on October 05, 2009, 07:19:11 AM
Hell fire and brimstone brought on by Christians praying.......or nuclear war brought on by the Muslims.....and both will be blamed on Bush.

It's almost time for the Umpteenth Annual Christmas Hate to begin, isn't it?
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: thundley4 on October 05, 2009, 07:35:55 AM
It's almost time for the Umpteenth Annual Christmas Hate to begin, isn't it?

Some stores  are already bringing out their Christmas displays.  :whatever:
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Deuce on October 05, 2009, 03:43:21 PM
Don't forget (blank) flu!
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 06, 2009, 09:15:57 AM
Since there really haven't proven to be any great ways to stop desertification yet, I would say it looks like there isn't any point in giving them money.  The rainfall is either there or it isn't, there are marginal areas where you can hold the line but it still all comes down to water supply, and temporary measures like irrigation only put a band-aid on an arterial wound. 
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: thundley4 on October 06, 2009, 09:21:09 AM
Since there really haven't proven to be any great ways to stop desertification yet, I would say it looks like there isn't any point in giving them money.  The rainfall is either there or it isn't, there are marginal areas where you can hold the line but it still all comes down to water supply, and temporary measures like irrigation only put a band-aid on an arterial wound. 

All the more reason to push for global warming. More ice melts, becomes water, which evaporates and then falls as rain.  :-)
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: The Village Idiot on October 06, 2009, 09:24:18 AM
Since there really haven't proven to be any great ways to stop desertification yet, I would say it looks like there isn't any point in giving them money.  The rainfall is either there or it isn't, there are marginal areas where you can hold the line but it still all comes down to water supply, and temporary measures like irrigation only put a band-aid on an arterial wound. 

re-desertificaton
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Alpha Mare on October 06, 2009, 09:32:44 AM
Since there really haven't proven to be any great ways to stop desertification yet, I would say it looks like there isn't any point in giving them money.  The rainfall is either there or it isn't, there are marginal areas where you can hold the line but it still all comes down to water supply, and temporary measures like irrigation only put a band-aid on an arterial wound. 

Don't tell that to Kay Bailey Hutchison-

Quote
Experimental Weather Modification (or “mitigation” which is not defined in these bills), can affect all of us by reducing water supplies and changing agricultural crop production cycles (micro-climates), while reducing crop production and water availability. Since most experimental weather modification programs use chemicals released into the atmosphere the public could be subjected to increasingly toxic or unknown substances that could have negative effects on agricultural, drinking water supplies, crops, and trees. If the weather is changed in one location it may have severe adverse consequences in another region, county or state.

Now, Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison (Texas), and Congressman Mark Udall (Colorado), have reintroduced similar bills for passage this year.

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/documents/htmldocs/pp_weather_mod_bills.htm

Quote
Summary: S. 601 would authorize the appropriation of $25 million for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2014 to establish a Weather Mitigation Research Office within the National Science Foundation (NSF).

http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/T?&report=sr057&dbname=111&
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Splashdown on October 06, 2009, 10:17:03 AM
Huh. I always thought it was water that was required to stop droughts.

Go figure.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Chris_ on October 06, 2009, 10:29:29 AM
Some stores  are already bringing out their Christmas displays.  :whatever:

The store I work for started right after Labor Day it is funny to see people come upto check out with a bathing suit and a Christmas ornament.
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: Alpha Mare on October 06, 2009, 10:37:49 AM
Huh. I always thought it was water that was required to stop droughts.

Go figure.

It's the only thing that works here.  Our farm accounts are down 75% this year.

http://www.texasclimatenews.org/TCNJournal/9109Isdroughtatasteofthefuture/tabid/1195/Default.aspx#
Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: thundley4 on October 06, 2009, 10:42:14 AM
Huh. I always thought it was water that was required to stop droughts.

Go figure.

Whatever happened to the idea of towing ice floes from the arctic and antarctic?  I thought at one time that desalinization plants were to provide fresh water from seawater.
The store I work for started right after Labor Day it is funny to see people come upto check out with a bathing suit and a Christmas ornament.

Kmart and Walmart are both in full swing. I can remember back in the 70's that Sears had a year around Christmas/Toyland, but that was back when people would use lay-a-way versus charge cards like now.

Title: Re: UN Needs $$$ to Stop Drought
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on October 06, 2009, 11:38:31 AM
Don't tell that to Kay Bailey Hutchison-

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/documents/htmldocs/pp_weather_mod_bills.htm

http://www.thomas.gov/cgi-bin/cpquery/T?&report=sr057&dbname=111&

Basically a vehicle to funnel a few tens of million of earmarked dollars for research project grants to the intended recipients.