The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: asdf2231 on September 28, 2009, 09:52:13 AM
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6642376
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:26 PM
Original message
Need to vent-All the Polanski apologist make me want to ****ing puke!
He raped a 13-year old girl. Got that? He drugged her and raped her. Any confusion?
It doesn't matter that he lived in a Nazi ghetto.
It doesn't matter that he lost his wife to the Manson Cult.
It doesn't matter that he has made great movies and is an Oscar winner.
He's a child rapist. He fled the county and lived the high life in Europe. (Where he found time to sleep with a 15 year-old Nastassja Kinski, charming fella huh?) How many other young European girls has he raped? People like him don't stop.
I hope he gets sent back to the States and gets the prison sentence he so richly deserves. I hope his money, fame and international connections will fail to protect him this time.
He's a rapist! Why are people defending him??? I've lost respect for those DUer's who are playing the role of rape apologist. Could someone please explain why people are defending him? Does it really just come down to him he being a famous and talented artist?
Roman Polanski is a rapist and he should be in prison.
Incidentally Proteus GOOD ONYA MATE!!!!! I would buy you a beer if I could right now.
And right out of the box is the Paederast's best friend...
mike_c (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. who will be helped by imprisoning him?
Seriously. What good-- other than exacting revenge on behalf of people who cannot seem to forgive after forty years-- what good would come from imprisoning Polanski?
I think what he did was reprehensible. But punishing him now, forty years too late, serves no real purpose other than to demonstrate just how puritan we've remained. Maybe we should flog him and cut off his hands while we're at it, huh?
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Wanting to punish a rapist is being a "puritan"?
Well then get me a buckle hat!
Punishing a child rapist isn't revenge, it's the right thing to do. I don't care how much time has passed. What good? I think not allowing a person to get away with rape is a very good thing.
Ask yourself this, if someone drugged and raped your daughter and wasn't punished for 40 years, you would be all, "It's ok man, ancient history."???
Call Me Wesley (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. First, he was punished already,
Edited on Sun Sep-27-09 05:59 PM by Call Me Wesley
second, and I'd like to quote your sigline here 'To be human is to choose,' so, if this was my daughter, and after 40 years (it was way before , though) she came to me and said that she forgave and would suffer more if this ugly thing would show up again, I'd trust my daughter and honor what she chose.
And no, this is no rapist excuse. This is honoring the victim's wish, if you like it or not, she has a lot more weight here than you do.
mike_c (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #162
200. yes, as a matter of fact I do....
And before the inevitable accusations begin to fly, yes, I too was sexually molested as a young boy. But the comments in this thread disgust me-- I'm so tired of revenge as justice and our sick societal focus on punishment, NO MATTER WHAT THE CRIME. Polanski has lived his life. If anyone is proof that someone can work through or around their demons, Polanski is. The crime has gone unpunished for forty years. What will change in the world if Polanski is hauled in for punishment now?
Nothing will change. No justice will be advanced. Only revenge will be exacted. If that's what American "justice" is really about-- revenge, at any cost-- it is little better than the crimes it punishes, IMO. I'm just sick of our national obsession with revenge against people we demonize for crimes they've committed.
quiller4 (1000+ posts) Mon Sep-28-09 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
258. He accepted a plea deal then fled when it appeared that the
judge was going to throw out the deal. Last year his attorney filed for a re-sentencing hearing and the victim volunteered to appear in his stead. Among considerations in the original deal the victim and/or her mother were the source of the drugs that Polanski consunmed along with the victim.
rug (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. The victim filed an affidavit to dismiss the case. Is she an apologist?
SpartanDem (1000+ posts) Mon Sep-28-09 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #246
253. yeah I'm ashamed that sickos like you and others are in this party
that would justify the rape of 13.
depakid (1000+ posts) Mon Sep-28-09 03:06 AM
Response to Reply #253
263. Typical Republican response- Limbaugh et al would be proud
to know that so many people have become simple minded and emotionally driven JUST LIKE THEM.
There are quite a few voices of reason speaking to ****ing idiots in this thread...
-
mike_c (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. who will be helped by imprisoning him?
Seriously. What good-- other than exacting revenge on behalf of people who cannot seem to forgive after forty years-- what good would come from imprisoning Polanski?
I think what he did was reprehensible. But punishing him now, forty years too late, serves no real purpose other than to demonstrate just how puritan we've remained. Maybe we should flog him and cut off his hands while we're at it, huh?
No, jackass, it represents that justice has been served despite his best efforts to elude it for the past 40 years.
-
So it's a republican thing to want to uphold the law now?
These people just seep the stupid.
-
I'm guessing this bonfire is gonna burn down the whole ****ing island.
This would please me greatly.
-
mike_c (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #162
200. yes, as a matter of fact I do....
And before the inevitable accusations begin to fly, yes, I too was sexually molested as a young boy. But the comments in this thread disgust me-- I'm so tired of revenge as justice and our sick societal focus on punishment, NO MATTER WHAT THE CRIME. Polanski has lived his life. If anyone is proof that someone can work through or around their demons, Polanski is. The crime has gone unpunished for forty years. What will change in the world if Polanski is hauled in for punishment now?
Nothing will change. No justice will be advanced. Only revenge will be exacted. If that's what American "justice" is really about-- revenge, at any cost-- it is little better than the crimes it punishes, IMO. I'm just sick of our national obsession with revenge against people we demonize for crimes they've committed.
Emphasis on the bolded part--I call bullshit on that. ANY reasonable victim of sexual abuse, rape, or whatever, would want to ensure that NOBODY ever has to endure what they did.
But then again, nobody accused DUmmies of being reasonable.
-
Emphasis on the bolded part--I call bullshit on that. ANY reasonable victim of sexual abuse, rape, or whatever, would want to ensure that NOBODY ever has to endure what they did.
But then again, nobody accused DUmmies of being reasonable.
I agree. I bet Mike_C doesn't agree with abolishing the statute of limitations that all states have on child molestation as well.
-
Under the dictionary definition of 'Low-life' it should say "An immoral and dishonest person, but nowhere near as bad as Mike-C."
-
3. Wanting to punish a rapist is being a "puritan"?
Well then get me a buckle hat!
I will get one for you, and myself!
-
mike_c (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. who will be helped by imprisoning him?
Seriously. What good-- other than exacting revenge on behalf of people who cannot seem to forgive after forty years-- what good would come from imprisoning Polanski?
I think what he did was reprehensible. But punishing him now, forty years too late, serves no real purpose other than to demonstrate just how puritan we've remained. Maybe we should flog him and cut off his hands while we're at it, huh?
You really gotta love the hypocrisy and pretzel logic of this asshat.
Soldiers serving in Iraq = War criminals! Toss ALL their sorry asses in jail!
A Hollyweird child diddler = free f*cking pass from paying for his crime.
I guess Bugsy has found some strange loophole in U.N. law to give Polanski a pass much in the same way he was trying to use U.N. law to justify dragging people like me into court.
Mike...in all honesty and sincerity...go play a nice game of hide and go f*ck yourself.
-
Just another thread that could have been so much more entertaining if the puritanical Skimmer had
not tombstoned DUmmy benburch.
-
I will get one for you, and myself!
People like these are why I have this motto memorized:
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
That day is getting closer and closer, DUmmies. You keep preaching about how a "civil war" is coming, and you'll get a war, alright--but it'll be anything but civil.
-
If they don't like it, they call it "revenge." If they are in favor, it's called "justice." :mental:
.
-
Molesters don't change, by throwing him in jail they can prevent countless other victims.
-
Two-faced scumbuckets.
-
People like these are why I have this motto memorized:
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
That day is getting closer and closer, DUmmies. You keep preaching about how a "civil war" is coming, and you'll get a war, alright--but it'll be anything but civil.
And the outcome will be horrible for them, too.
-
I wonder, if CNN were to flash a picture of mike_c during primetime with the caption: Call CNN if you know this man, how many people would come forward with tales of mike_c's criminal past.
He doth protest too much.
-
I'm so tired of revenge as justice and our sick societal focus on punishment, NO MATTER WHAT THE CRIME
No matter what the crime??
SO I guess Bush and Cheney and Rove are off the hook?
-
Mike C strikes again. I wonder if he is a pedophile himself.
-
Emphasis on the bolded part--I call bullshit on that. ANY reasonable victim of sexual abuse, rape, or whatever, would want to ensure that NOBODY ever has to endure what they did.
But then again, nobody accused DUmmies of being reasonable.
Actually I'm thinking that he's projecting what "HE" did and is looking for an excuse for it, hang the f***er!
-
So MikeC considers that when he was 15 and he bent over in a public bathroom and screamed "stick it here" to be a molestation?
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/mamacags/Bugsytraitor.jpg)
-
Mike C strikes again. I wonder if he is a pedophile himself.
Only to juvenile insects.
-
Only to juvenile insects.
EEEEEWWWWWW!!!!!!!!! :puke:
-
Mike C strikes again. I wonder if he is a pedophile himself.
He could start a radio show - with a nice catchphrase like "Get 'buggered' with mike_c in the morning, Monday through Friday, 5 to 9! Only on 100.3 -- K*NT FM ! " He would be an overnight sensation.
-
Everyone should be aware that DUmmy mike_c claims to be a bug teacher in real life at some halfass college.
Much higher level than Lleu's Draw This Kitty U., but anyplace with this DUmmy on faculty qualifies as halfass.
-
Everyone should be aware that DUmmy mike_c claims to be a bug teacher in real life at some halfass college.
Much higher level than Lleu's Draw This Kitty U., but anyplace with this DUmmy on faculty qualifies as halfass.
Draw This Kitty U?
lol
Hey!
-
Good I think they all need to get a clue but for them it would mean removing their heads from their as*es
-
So it's a republican thing to want to uphold the law now?
These people just seep the stupid.
That's exactly why, when my mother asks, "Am I a conservative or a liberal?" I respond by asking, "Do you believe in law and order?"
With just that one question, I know who's side she's on.
-
mike_c (1000+ posts) Sun Sep-27-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. who will be helped by imprisoning him?
Seriously. What good-- other than exacting revenge on behalf of people who cannot seem to forgive after forty years-- what good would come from imprisoning Polanski?
I think what he did was reprehensible. But punishing him now, forty years too late, serves no real purpose other than to demonstrate just how puritan we've remained. Maybe we should flog him and cut off his hands while we're at it, huh?
Well, it begs to question what time-period will be adopted that allows such behavior... Right now, in his twisted mind, it's 40 years. Give it a little time and it will boil down to mere hours.
-
By the way, I just got done reading The Kennedys: The Third Generation (Barbara Gibson, 1993, Thunder's Mouth Press), wherein as an incidental aside, the author mentions that Robert and Ethel Kennedy dined with Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate the night before the presidential candidate was assassinated in California.
Given the primitives' propensity for conspiracies, one wonders what the primitives might make of that.
-
By the way, I just got done reading The Kennedys: The Third Generation (Barbara Gibson, 1993, Thunder's Mouth Press), wherein as an incidental aside, the author mentions that Robert and Ethel Kennedy dined with Roman Polanski and Sharon Tate the night before the presidential candidate was assassinated in California.
Given the primitives' propensity for conspiracies, one wonders what the primitives might make of that.
I am sure this will be Bush's fault somewhere