The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on July 30, 2009, 11:42:14 AM
-
Blowed up. Blowed up real good.
The Straight Story (1000+ posts) Thu Jul-30-09 12:15 PM
Original message
Sacramento Man, 19, Arrested for Blowing Up Cat
SACRAMENTO, CA - A 19-year-old Sacramento man who investigators said helped bind a small cat and killed it with an explosive was arrested late Wednesday, according to Sacramento police.
David Yang, 19, was placed into custody around 6:40 p.m. Wednesday on the 6200 block of Lemon Hill Drive after police were tipped off to Young's involvment in Tuesday's attack, Sacramento Police Sgt. Norm Leong said.
Leong said officers arrived on the 6200 block of 63rd Street in Sacramento Tuesday evening to find the bound remains of a gray and white cat. Investigators said witnesses reported seeing a group of young people captured the animal, wrap duct tape around its legs, then place it under a construction cone and drop an M-80 or another type of fire cracker explosive inside the cone.
Yang was arrested for a parole violation and could face additional charges of animal cruelty. The investigation into the cat's death was ongoing continuing and Leong said it was unclear why Yang committed the crime.
http://www.news10.net/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=642...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6185313
As you can imagine, the DUmmies do not approve.
JonQ (1000+ posts) Thu Jul-30-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm glad they called him a man
too often they go with "teen" or youth in these cases.
Nope, he's an adult, albeit a young one, and should be tried as such.
Sicko.
aquart (1000+ posts) Thu Jul-30-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It terrifies me to think that sick sadist is on the loose.
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Thu Jul-30-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Future serial killer
I hope they lock him up and throw away the key.
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Thu Jul-30-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. He needs to go away --
and stay awy for a really long time.
The thing that puzzles me is this: The DUmp wants to take the idiot that blew up this cat, and kill him. But they will turn right around and justify and sympathize with a muzzie who blows up himself and a bunch of U.S. Marines.
-
If the guy had only sodomized the cat he would be a hero at the DUmp.
-
If the guy had only sodomized the cat he would be a hero at the DUmp.
No, I doubt it. Yesterday, they were up in arms over a weirdo who had an intimate relationship with a horse. Repeatedly.
Since they tombstoned DUmmy benburch, guys like that don't get a fair shake at the DUmp.
-
No, I doubt it. Yesterday, they were up in arms over a weirdo who had an intimate relationship with a horse. Repeatedly.
Since they tombstoned DUmmy benburch, guys like that don't get a fair shake at the DUmp.
Oh my.
This compelled me to look around for Fat Che, to see what he's been up to lately.
This is a year old, but Fat Che hasn't been around much, anywhere, lately.
Full details at the link below.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:BenBurch
As those of you attending to this issue know, on July 30, 2008 I won the lawsuit brought against me by the writer who calls herself Violet Blue.
"Violet Blue" was seeking a restraining order to prevent me from ever editing her wikipedia entry again (or causing others to do so). She also sought an order that I could not "harass, attack, strike, threaten, assualt (sexually or otherwise), hit, follow, [or] stalk [her or her partner Jonathan Moore], destroy [their] personal property, keep [them] under surveillance, block [their] movements, [or] contact [them]." She asked the court to order me to stay away from them, their home, their workplaces, and their motor vehicles. She also sought to prohibit me from owning firearms. She lost on all counts.
In the denied lawsuit, "Violet Blue" accused me under oath of stalking her and said her request was "based on a credible threat of violence"! This, even though I live 2000 miles away. This, even though she was quoted four weeks ago in a police report as saying she didn't fear me because I live in Illinois, but she just didn't want me to "taint her name." (She went back to the police a second time on Tuesday to change her story to say she really did fear me.)
Why would she accuse me of stalking her when I've never met the woman and haven't been to San Francisco since the 1990's? Note that the court does not charge ordinary court filing fees to people who legitimately fear violence or stalking. Since it is clear that any representation that I had threatened violence against her or that she had any legitmate reason to fear me has already been rejected by the court, a rational person could conclude that her accusation was merely to avoid paying the fee using a provision of the law meant to protect legitimate victims of domestic violence.
Anybody remember this, when Fat Che was stalking that porn actress?
I do.
-
I don't remember this, from here, but I had stumbled on to the story from Violet Blues point of view some time ago, but can't remember the specifics.
-
I don't remember this, from here, but I had stumbled on to the story from Violet Blues point of view some time ago, but can't remember the specifics.
It was posted here, too, but it was a very long time ago.
I remember that mamacags responded on the thread.
Maybe 14-15 months ago?
-
I'm guessing you enjoy blowing up and torturing cats or other small animals in your spare time. How does this show that DU'ers are dumb in this case?
-
I'm guessing you enjoy blowing up and torturing cats or other small animals in your spare time. How does this show that DU'ers are dumb in this case?
Hi, Bill! Say, Bill, before you ESAD, could you let us know your DUmp name? My guess is you're one of the unterprimitiven, the faceless mob. A DUmmy of prominence would be more subtle, or "suttle" as it's usually called by professional educators at the DUmp.
-
Take a look at the Wiki page quick before it's gone.... :lmao:
-
Hi, Bill! Say, Bill, before you ESAD, could you let us know your DUmp name? My guess is you're one of the unterprimitiven, the faceless mob. A DUmmy of prominence would be more subtle, or "suttle" as it's usually called by professional educators at the DUmp.
The unterprimitives are not very good at going undercover.
-
I'm guessing you enjoy blowing up and torturing cats or other small animals in your spare time. How does this show that DU'ers are dumb in this case?
DUer's are DUmb in every case, yourself included.
-
Well I guess you guys are just as ignorant as the people you decry, because I'm not a DU'er; I was banned a long time ago from the DU for being to vocal about the 2nd Amendment. But go ahead and not believe that, because your rancor is already showing. Doesn't take much to show how miserable some conservatives are. You know the greatest thing!?
Not one of you have answered: How does wanting a person who tortured a cat to go to jail show stupidity?
I'm guess you all were big Michael Vick supporters.
-
Ah, "up"... the title has the word "up". I misread the title, but it still made sense.
:-)
-
Well I guess you guys are just as ignorant as the people you decry, because I'm not a DU'er; I was banned a long time ago from the DU for being to vocal about the 2nd Amendment. But go ahead and not believe that, because your rancor is already showing. Doesn't take much to show how miserable some conservatives are. You know the greatest thing!?
Not one of you have answered: How does wanting a person who tortured a cat to go to jail show stupidity?
I'm guess you all were big Michael Vick supporters.
Once a DUmmie, always a DUmmie. The point is that DUmmies have no problem with killing babies when it's convenient, but throw a hissy fit when animals are harmed. Most of us on here want the perps punished for killing a pet, but we don't condone killing babies.
-
Well, Bill, the conundrum is the fact the the DUmpmonkiees will denounce a cat killer but at the same time uphold the "rights" of mothers to kill the unborn, support Islamist bombers, and , in Tookie's case, wring their hands for a murderer.
Strange.....don't you think?
-
I think Bill and SamAdams should go bowling together. They are like 2 peas in a pod.
-
Hey I never said I'm the defender of all things DU, I already said I was banned from their site. I just like pointing out the stupidity I find in the liberal and conservative circles.
I just don't think comments like the ones quoted are great at showing DU stupidity. What wanting him in jail, is stupid? What is someone tied up your dog or cat and blew him up?
Future serial killer
I hope they lock him up and throw away the key.
Serial killers have been know to practice on defenseless animals, throwing away the key is a little harsh but more emotional than substance.
I'm glad they called him a man
too often they go with "teen" or youth in these cases.
Nope, he's an adult, albeit a young one, and should be tried as such.
Sicko.
What wanting a 19 year old man to be tried as an adult is stupid? I though at 18 you were an adult, this just seems like the poster is glad he's not being lumped into the "poor child" category like the 19 year old gang bangers that shoot each other and then become "children' in the media's eyes. Isn't that a common conservative complaint?
He needs to go away --
and stay awy for a really long time.
That fine, Vick went away for a long time and now he's back, no one's shedding tears over him (except maybe falcon's fans). Hopefully he learned dog fighting isn't a legitimate sport.
I don't know how any of these comments are stupid, maybe someone can enlighten me?
P.S. Please don't assume my views on abortion or other topics, you don't know me yet.
-
Hey I never said I'm the defender of all things DU, I already said I was banned from their site. I just like pointing out the stupidity I find in the liberal and conservative circles.
I just don't think comments like the ones quoted are great at showing DU stupidity. What wanting him in jail, is stupid? What is someone tied up your dog or cat and blew him up?
Serial killers have been know to practice on defenseless animals, throwing away the key is a little harsh but more emotional than substance.
What wanting a 19 year old man to be tried as an adult is stupid? I though at 18 you were an adult, this just seems like the poster is glad he's not being lumped into the "poor child" category like the 19 year old gang bangers that shoot each other and then become "children' in the media's eyes. Isn't that a common conservative complaint?
That fine, Vick went away for a long time and now he's back, no one's shedding tears over him (except maybe falcon's fans). Hopefully he learned dog fighting isn't a legitimate sport.
I don't know how any of these comments are stupid, maybe someone can enlighten me?
P.S. Please don't assume my views on abortion or other topics, you don't know me yet.
Since you are ignoring the others, who already answered your question, I'll speak slowly so you can understamd. They are not saying those comments, on their own, are stupid. They are saying those comments, in conjunction with the majority of the DUmp posts ( which cheer abortion, abhor civility and cry buckets over the death penalty), are stupid. It shows the complete hypocracy that is the DUmp.
Oh, and before you start throwing stones about getting to know people before making assumptions, I suggest you take your own advice.
-
They are saying those comments, in conjunction with the majority of the DUmp posts ( which cheer abortion, abhor civility and cry buckets over the death penalty), are stupid. It shows the complete hypocracy that is the DUmp.
Oh, and before you start throwing stones about getting to know people before making assumptions, I suggest you take your own advice.
I'm guess you did checks on all those posters to confirm their abortion views? I wasn't trying to drift the thread but since it is now impossible for my to respond without a slight drift I will.
Abortion views vary wildly through out America. Some believe that No abortion under any circumstances is ok even if the mothers life is in danger or its a child of rape or incest. I think these people are extremist and are wrong.
Then their are others who think abortion should be legal until 8 months and 29 days into the pregnancy. I think these people are extremists and are wrong.
There are people in this country who want us to release every single detainee in Gitmo today into America, or a country of their choosing. I think these people are extremists and are wrong.
There are people in this country that never want us to release a single person in Gitmo, as they are all obviously terrorists, don't deserve a trial, and we should just kill them all already. I think these people are extremists and are wrong.
My view on the death penalty is simple. For cases of child molestation, murder, and rape the death penalty should be used if DNA evidence is matched from the crime scene / victim. I have no prob with executing criminals as long as theirs sufficient evidence.
Oh, and before you start throwing stones about getting to know people before making assumptions, I suggest you take your own advice.
When did I make assumptions?
I'm guessing there aren't many libertarians here?
-
I'm guess you did checks on all those posters to confirm their abortion views? I wasn't trying to drift the thread but since it is now impossible for my to respond without a slight drift I will.
Abortion views vary wildly through out America. Some believe that No abortion under any circumstances is ok even if the mothers life is in danger or its a child of rape or incest. I think these people are extremist and are wrong.
Then their are others who think abortion should be legal until 8 months and 29 days into the pregnancy. I think these people are extremists and are wrong.
There are people in this country who want us to release every single detainee in Gitmo today into America, or a country of their choosing. I think these people are extremists and are wrong.
There are people in this country that never want us to release a single person in Gitmo, as they are all obviously terrorists, don't deserve a trial, and we should just kill them all already. I think these people are extremists and are wrong.
My view on the death penalty is simple. For cases of child molestation, murder, and rape the death penalty should be used if DNA evidence is matched from the crime scene / victim. I have no prob with executing criminals as long as theirs sufficient evidence.
When did I make assumptions?
I'm guessing there aren't many libertarians here?
Thank you, oh great wise one. Before you graced us with your presence I never knew that! :whatever:
-
Thank you, oh great wise one. Before you graced us with your presence I never knew that!
I'm glad you recognized intelligence obviously superior to yours. :-)
It's also ironic that our little exchange went like this.
Flame
I think Bill and SamAdams should go bowling together. They are like 2 peas in a pod.
Me
P.S. Please don't assume my views on abortion or other topics, you don't know me yet.
Flame
Oh, and before you start throwing stones about getting to know people before making assumptions, I suggest you take your own advice.
Me
When did I make assumptions?
Funny the only one making assumptions is you, and then you tell me not to make assumptions, and yet you won't respond when I ask you were I made an assumption. Are you deliberately trying to be humorous, cause I'm laughing my a$$ off over here.
-
Why can't new people just come to a site, introduce themselves and then behave for awhile.They alwyas have to come in with something to prove... :mental:
-
I'm glad you recognized intelligence obviously superior to yours. :-)
It's also ironic that our little exchange went like this.
Flame
Me
Flame
Me
Funny the only one making assumptions is you, and then you tell me not to make assumptions, and yet you won't respond when I ask you were I made an assumption. Are you deliberately trying to be humorous, cause I'm laughing my a$$ off over here.
I wasn't making assumptions on anything you didn't clearly portray. I was comparing you and Sam, becasue you both act like dickish trolls, not on your beliefs about anything. Just your behavior. So, suck it.
-
I wasn't making assumptions on anything you didn't clearly portray. I was comparing you and Sam, becasue you both act like dickish trolls, not on your beliefs about anything. Just your behavior. So, suck it.
:rotf:
-
Strange.....don't you think?
Even stranger considering that many of us here have cats, even if we're not cat persons, and anyone who tries--tries--to harm a hair on any one of our cats is in for some, uh, trouble.
The issue here is not cruelty to animals, but why the primitives are so inconsistent about what sorts of life they defend, or wish to be killed. Utterly inconsistent.
-
As you can imagine, the DUmmies do not approve.
The thing that puzzles me is this: The DUmp wants to take the idiot that blew up this cat, and kill him. But they will turn right around and justify and sympathize with a muzzie who blows up himself and a bunch of U.S. Marines.
Not to mention defending to their last breath a woman's "right" to have a human life either sucked out of their womb or have it mostly born, and sucking its brains out....
All in the name of "choice"...
Too bad so many of their mothers chose life....
-
This was a perfectly fine thread. One of the better blown-up-cat threads of recent days.
Now it has the clinging stench of that DUmmy troll all over it.
Hopefully the DUmmies will soon come up with another stupid discussion of a small blown up
animal, to take the place of this one.
The DUmmies really know how to put on a blown-up-animal discussion.
-
Even stranger considering that many of us here have cats, even if we're not cat persons, and anyone who tries--tries--to harm a hair on any one of our cats is in for some, uh, trouble.
The issue here is not cruelty to animals, but why the primitives are so inconsistent about what sorts of life they defend, or wish to be killed. Utterly inconsistent.
Very true, I have a contractor building a house down the street that I know (not friends but I have worked with him). Anyway, he made a comment about one of my cats not knowing it was mine, I suggested that if ANYTHING happened to any of my or any other animals here that the house he's building his trucks and anything else might just burn down.
The moral of the story, he got the message.
-
Oh I must have misunderstood the general vibe of this thread. It was so easy to misunderstand people with such enlighten comments such as:
Blowed up. Blowed up real good.
This was a perfectly fine thread. One of the better blown-up-cat threads of recent days.
Now it has the clinging stench of that DUmmy troll all over it.
That so perfectly illustrated that the OP was against killing cats. I mean how could I be so foolish! It's not like the OP framed the debate, (as was later done 3 time about the hypocrisy between abortion vs torturing animals).
Another great thing about this thread is that despite how civil I've tried to be, it seems you guys have so much anger you can't even address me without attempting to insult me. All the while I haven't resorted to name calling, as some obviously have. How big of you, did you learn that debate tactic in the 2nd grade? Oh but you'll turn around and say I've had an attitude this whole thread, well that's because your seeing red over someone how obviously doesn't 100% agree with you. Sputter stutter whaa Bahhh the nerve of some guy to post on a conservative board that doesn't 100% agree with us! Bahh Rabble Rabble Rabble!
I wasn't making assumptions on anything you didn't clearly portray. I was comparing you and Sam, because you both act like dickish trolls, not on your beliefs about anything. Just your behavior. So, suck it.
Awesome, coming from a mod. I love it when I can get under someones skin so quickly, It just shows how truly weak and angry some people are. That has got to be a record for me.
You pretty much do make an assumption about me, despite what you wish to think. Tell me not to make assumptions, and then when I ask you to tell me where I made an assumption about you, you just ignore the question. Typical just make up BS and then when you get called on it, ignore or back peddle. Are you deliberately trying to be obtuse? The only one acting dickish is you sir. Maybe you should try and calm down and reread the thread.
-
Mellow out, Bill.
Life's a lot easier when one's mellow.
-
Bill, if thats your real name, calm down. Most of the people on this board are cat owners/lovers I bet. We mock the radical left for holding up idiots like Margaret Sanger and Peter Singer and John Holdren as icons of ethics. These weirdo's truly seem to believe that an animals life is more important than a cats life or a pigs life or a snail darters life.
How hard is that to understand?
-
Modified, because I hit the worng button....oops.
-
Tell me not to make assumptions, and then when I ask you to tell me where I made an assumption about you, you just ignore the question.
The only one acting dickish is you sir
There is your assupmtion, troll.
-
There is your assupmtion, troll.
After the fact. Idiot.
And that's not an assumption. Its a statement to your general attitude.
-
Oh my.
-
Hey I never said I'm the defender of all things DU, I already said I was banned from their site.
.....
P.S. Please don't assume my views on abortion or other topics, you don't know me yet.
DUmmy Bill, confirming one of the funadamental theorems of DUmp psychology: DUmmies lie, all the time, they lie.
He even lies about his glee at the thought of vacuuming the brains out of a living, partially born infant.
But, by god, sir, take your hands off that cat!
I really hope that, before he takes my advice to ESAD, he will give us his DUmp name. Skimmer would be so proud of him.
-
After the fact. Idiot.
And that's not an assumption. Its a statement to your general attitude.
Again, another assumption! I was talking about you calling me dickish...that doesn't bother me in the slightest. The assumption was when you called me SIR.
I'm outta here...you bore me.
-
Quote from: Wineslob on July 30, 2009, 11:55:17 am
Strange.....don't you think?
Even stranger considering that many of us here have cats, even if we're not cat persons, and anyone who tries--tries--to harm a hair on any one of our cats is in for some, uh, trouble.
The issue here is not cruelty to animals, but why the primitives are so inconsistent about what sorts of life they defend, or wish to be killed. Utterly inconsistent.
This is part of the "question" I wanted answered:
Abortion views vary wildly through out America. Some believe that No abortion under any circumstances is ok even if the mothers life is in danger or its a child of rape or incest. I think these people are extremist and are wrong.
Then their are others who think abortion should be legal until 8 months and 29 days into the pregnancy. I think these people are extremists and are wrong
.
but he wants his fetus, and cake too. They never consider adoption.........
-
DUmmy Bill, confirming one of the funadamental theorems of DUmp psychology: DUmmies lie, all the time, they lie.
He even lies about his glee at the thought of vacuuming the brains out of a living, partially born infant.
You sound like the most uneducated person I've meet online. First off try and spell "funadamental" correctly, I mean the forum even has spell check, I shouldn't be that hard. Second I love how you automatically know me, and can tell when a person is lying over the internet. The CIA would love to recruit someone with such magical skills as yourself. Have you even made it out of elementary school yet? If you had you'd realize name calling is a debate tactic 8 year old's use and just makes you look uneducated.
If you don't want to believe what I've written so be it, no skin off my nose. But unfortunately for you I'm no longer a member of the DU, I was banned a long time ago or else I would give you my user name.
I guess I can make broad generalizations about you as well.
Considering your writing style you must be an uneducated redneck that is racist, and has never made it out of high school.
It must be sad living in such a close minded world.
but he wants his fetus, and cake too. They never consider adoption.........
Two questions for you.
First off are you a female?
Second how would you like it if your wife / sister / mother was raped and got pregnant as a result. I'm assuming you would demand that she carry the baby to term?
-
Boring, tiresome, and headache-inducing. Will not spend time reading Bill's stuff.
-
I'm guessing you enjoy blowing up and torturing cats or other small animals in your spare time. How does this show that DU'ers are dumb in this case?
Nope, just liberals. But of course, they don't have the balls to stick around anywhere long so I don't get to very often.
Point of order- you need to torture the liberal before blowing him/her/it up. If you do it the other way you don't have as much fun.
-
You sound like the most uneducated person I've meet online. First off try and spell "funadamental" correctly, I mean the forum even has spell check, I shouldn't be that hard. Second I love how you automatically know me, and can tell when a person is lying over the internet. The CIA would love to recruit someone with such magical skills as yourself. Have you even made it out of elementary school yet? If you had you'd realize name calling is a debate tactic 8 year old's use and just makes you look uneducated.
If you don't want to believe what I've written so be it, no skin off my nose. But unfortunately for you I'm no longer a member of the DU, I was banned a long time ago or else I would give you my user name.
I guess I can make broad generalizations about you as well.
Considering your writing style you must be an uneducated redneck that is racist, and has never made it out of high school.
It must be sad living in such a close minded world.
Two questions for you.
First off are you a female?
Second how would you like it if your wife / sister / mother was raped and got pregnant as a result. I'm assuming you would demand that she carry the baby to term?
Bill....Bill....Bill....tsk tsk....if you are going to criticize a poster's spelling....you need to check your own spelling and grammar in the same post.
If you would spend some time reading peoples' comments throughout the forum ...you would learn much ...and be much better off rather than levying criticism without knowledge.
There are many, many people here who are owned by cats. Those that do not have cats, most likely have a dog....if not both....
If anyone laid a hand on one of our animals in anger .....they would be pulling back a stub.
You would have known that many of the original answers regarding the sick individual who hurt the cat....were said in sarcasm. However...you assumed they were said literally.
You would also have known that "Flame" is a lovely woman, who you besmirched with your comments toward her....again because you don't know her.
Take a chill pill....and get to know the people here, before you lob zingers at them. You have only gotten what you first handed out....
-
Bill....Bill....Bill....tsk tsk....if you are going to criticize a poster's spelling....you need to check your own spelling and grammar in the same post.
If you would spend some time reading peoples' comments throughout the forum ...you would learn much ...and be much better off rather than levying criticism without knowledge.
There are many, many people here who are owned by cats. Those that do not have cats, most likely have a dog....if not both....
If anyone laid a hand on one of our animals in anger .....they would be pulling back a stub.
You would have known that many of the original answers regarding the sick individual who hurt the cat....were said in sarcasm. However...you assumed they were said literally.
You would also have known that "Flame" is a lovely woman, who you besmirched with your comments toward her....again because you don't know her.
Take a chill pill....and get to know the people here, before you lob zingers at them. You have only gotten what you first handed out....
Bill is just doing what lib trolls do.
-
You know, DUmmy Bill is one of the few DUmpmonkeys who show up here with the same vulgar, vile, vicious personality that predominates at the DUmp. They usually try to fake a more civilized veneer at first. Not DUmmy Bill. He is democrat through and through, from the word go.
Oh, and by the way, DUmmy Bill, you should be more careful when you criticize me for a one-letter typo:
the most uneducated person I've meet online
really DUmb error in verb tense
the forum even has spell check, I shouldn't be that hard
really DUmb typo, or Freudian slip
a debate tactic 8 year old's use
really DUmb plural
And that's just in a single short paragraph of DUmmy-style prose.
You need to get back into that ESL class, DUmmy Bill! You're not at the DUmp!
Maybe this site will get some diversity credit from the Kenyan-in-chief for having you here.
-
You would also have known that "Flame" is a lovely woman, who you besmirched with your comments toward her....again because you don't know her.
Take a chill pill....and get to know the people here, before you lob zingers at them. You have only gotten what you first handed out....
How did I besmirch her? And maybe you should reread the thread, I'm sure it was me who started the name calling and the overly aggressive attitude.
You know, DUmmy Bill is one of the few DUmpmonkeys who show up here with the same vulgar, vile, vicious personality that predominates at the DUmp. They usually try to fake a more civilized veneer at first. Not DUmmy Bill. He is democrat through and through, from the word go.
I'm a libertarian but your obviously to blinded by your prejudice to see past your "Ahh Democrat!" mentality. Its ironic that you talk about a vile vulgar vicious personality yet its only the conservative posters who have been name calling. Do I really need to quote all the different slurs that have been hurled at me? Even Dummy Bill haha your a riot. But its sad that in the same post that you decry me for being vile, there you are name calling like a child.
the forum even has spell check, I shouldn't be that hard
really DUmb typo, or Freudian slip
Not a typo or Freudian slip, it was short hand for It shouldn't be that hard to spell words correctly.
a debate tactic 8 year old's use
really DUmb plural
And that's just in a single short paragraph of DUmmy-style prose.
You need to get back into that ESL class, DUmmy Bill! You're not at the DUmp!
No the plural was intentional because a few of your "respectful" posters have to resort to name calling to attempt to brow beat someone who does not agree with them. Maybe you should go take some remedial writing courses before you criticize or a debate class and figure out calling people names makes you look foolish. If actually had a logical argument you wouldn't have to resort to such low brow tactics. This entire thread shows the entire problem plaguing the Republican party, stubbornness, and an inability to listen to anyone who does not agree with you. But continue away posting your slurs; it just proves me right.
-
Two questions for you.
First off are you a female?
Second how would you like it if your wife / sister / mother was raped and got pregnant as a result. I'm assuming you would demand that she carry the baby to term?
First off whether a person is a female or not is immaterial to how they feel about the act of destroying the life of an unborn child. As a matter of fact I would bet that a vast majority of mothers would abhor the idea of suctioning the brains out of their child.
Since I am not a killer I guess I can have no opinion on murder? or since I am not a rapist or since I am not a...... its a canard. Anyone who says you cannot have an opinion because your not a _________ should automatically lose the debate.
-
Sheeeesh .....I just dropped in to see if the little punk had blown up the UGP yet.
-
Sheeeesh .....I just dropped in to see if the little punk had blown up the UGP yet.
Hi-5 :rotf:
-
Bill should rack up some more posts so I can send this thread to a more suitable venue...
That said :
This is one of the rare occasions I find myself in agreement with a DUmmie. Cruelty - intentional or otherwise - to animals or humans is unacceptable.
The whole point of it, as has been mentioned before, is to highlight the flexible morality that is consistently displayed over at the DU.
-
I'm a libertarian but your obviously to blinded by your prejudice
DUmmy Bill's posts are hard to read. DUmmies love homos, but apparently not homonyms.
Screwing up two homonyms in half of one sentence probably ties a record.
And I find it hard to take his claims of libertarianism seriously.
Most ronbots, before going insane, were decent people, and still bear telltale traces of civility.
DUmmies were never and are never decent, nor civil.
DUmmy Bill fits the latter description.
-
Even stranger considering that many of us here have cats, even if we're not cat persons, and anyone who tries--tries--to harm a hair on any one of our cats is in for some, uh, trouble.
The issue here is not cruelty to animals, but why the primitives are so inconsistent about what sorts of life they defend, or wish to be killed. Utterly inconsistent.
What you said, Coach! Anyone harms my "kids", will be eating lead!
How 'bout this Billie Boy, **** OFF! You don't know any of us here! You make assumptions without knowledge. In my book, as you have so eloquently put in one of your posts, are by far, one of the most uneducated trolls I have ever come across!
**** you! **** you bery much! Now LEAVE! Go back to mommy's basement and untwist your panties! We don't need morans here! We tend to have intelligent conversations!
oh, just in case you're interested, spelling in this post is INTENTIONAL, asswipe!
-
a debate tactic 8 year old's use...
No the plural was intentional because a few of your "respectful" posters have to resort to name calling to attempt to brow beat someone who does not agree with them. Maybe you should go take some remedial writing courses before you criticize or a debate class and figure out calling people names makes you look foolish. If actually had a logical argument you wouldn't have to resort to such low brow tactics. This entire thread shows the entire problem plaguing the Republican party, stubbornness, and an inability to listen to anyone who does not agree with you. But continue away posting your slurs; it just proves me right.
That's not plural, Billy, that's possessive. Plural doesn't have apostrophes....
Nobody else here writes in DUmmie "shorthand", or whatever you call it. Your writing style and prose is almost impossible to read and understand on the first pass....
Maybe YOU should check into some remedial courses....
Come back when you can write like a normal person, not a DUmmie....
-
You sound like the most uneducated person I've meet online. First off try and spell "funadamental" correctly, I mean the forum even has spell check, I shouldn't be that hard. Second I love how you automatically know me, and can tell when a person is lying over the internet. The CIA would love to recruit someone with such magical skills as yourself. Have you even made it out of elementary school yet? If you had you'd realize name calling is a debate tactic 8 year old's use and just makes you look uneducated.
If you don't want to believe what I've written so be it, no skin off my nose. But unfortunately for you I'm no longer a member of the DU, I was banned a long time ago or else I would give you my user name.
I guess I can make broad generalizations about you as well.
Considering your writing style you must be an uneducated redneck that is racist, and has never made it out of high school.
It must be sad living in such a close minded world.
Two questions for you.
First off are you a female?
Second how would you like it if your wife / sister / mother was raped and got pregnant as a result. I'm assuming you would demand that she carry the baby to term?
Nope, quite male.
I would support them in any way possible, but not abortion. Why should a child that can/could be adopted be murdered?
That last question shows the problem with looking at everything in grey tones (Liberalism). Sometimes the hardest thing to do is the right thing, which can be very black/white.
-
That last question shows the problem with looking at everything in grey tones (Liberalism). Sometimes the hardest thing to do is the right thing, which can be very black/white.
Couldn't have ever said it any better, Wine!
-
If you toss a kitten out at 70,000 feet (assuming it is in a pressure suit with O ) how long will it take before it lands on it's feet?