The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: bijou on July 14, 2009, 07:39:15 AM
-
Osama bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda network has taken up the cause of China’s Muslim Uighur minority with a pledge to attack Chinese workers in northwestern Africa in retaliation for mistreatment by Beijing of its largest Muslim minority.
Al-Qaeda's Algerian-based offshoot, al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), has issued the call for vengeance, according to the South China Morning Post, which quoted an intelligence report from the London-based risk analysis firm Stirling Assynt.
It would be the first time that bin Laden’s organisation has threatened China or its interests — underlying the risks Beijing faces as it expands its economic investments overseas.
The assessment by Sterling Assynt warned that the threat should be taken seriously and said: “Although AQIM appear to be the first arm of al-Qaeda to officially state they will target Chinese interests, others are likely to follow." ....
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/china/article6704812.ece
As the Chinese say, 'may you live in interesting times'.
-
Yeah, good luck with all that, Al-Q. China isn't restricted by it's radical moonbats. They will **** you up without compassion. No Guantanamo for you.
-
I'd love to see Frau Pelosi pissing and moaning about Chinese interrogation techniques.
-
Yeah, good luck with all that, Al-Q. China isn't restricted by it's radical moonbats. They will **** you up without compassion. No Guantanamo for you.
Actually, they are not restricted by anything. These are the people who make their prisoners organ donors--whether the donors are ready to donate or not. Al-Q may be about to meet an opponent as ruthless as they are.
-
Actually, they are not restricted by anything. These are the people who make their prisoners organ donors--whether the donors are ready to donate or not. Al-Q may be about to meet an opponent as ruthless as they are.
are you saying we can't win the war because we are not agressive enough?
-
are you saying we can't win the war because we are not agressive enough?
I would not go that far, but i would say that it will take longer than it would otherwise.
-
I don't think the chinese would bat an eye at using a nuke on them. What is the world going to do to China if they did, NOT A GOD DAMNED THING.
-
I don't think the chinese would bat an eye at using a nuke on them. What is the world going to do to China if they did, NOT A GOD DAMNED THING.
Especially with Lord Ø as "leader" of the free world...
-
I don't think the chinese would bat an eye at using a nuke on them. What is the world going to do to China if they did, NOT A GOD DAMNED THING.
And that is a bad thing?
-
Especially with Lord Ø as "leader" of the free world...
In the words of Von Clausewitz, "Never get involved in a war on the Asian landmass."
True dat.
The Maneuvering Room (more like a box with panels) on a submarine is a very interesting place, particularly on the midwatch after having been out for 50-60 days. The conversations were, shall we say, interesting at times. We figured out once that if we actually nuked the 1000 largest Chinese cities, you'd still have something like 700 million Chinese left. Needless to say, not good odds for the guys in the white hats, so to speak.
Food for thought.
-
This could get real interesting. Of course there is no concentrated target for the Chinese to nuke, so that's just silly; and they aren't going to nuke Mecca, they are every bit as dependent on that Saudi/Gulf oil flowing as we are. Conventionally, the Chinese military has never been expeditionary (In the sense of going anywhere they couldn't just drive or walk to). AQ can hurt them, but not mortally; they can kill AQ members, but can't wipe them out. It could last quite awhile and never produce decisive results either way.
-
Which side will 0Bama take, the Chinese or Al Qaeda ?
-
Which side will 0Bama take, the Chinese or Al Qaeda ?
either way it will take him three days to say anything
-
Which side will 0Bama take, the Chinese or Al Qaeda ?
Yes.
-
The Chinese and the Russian mafia are in Africa (and making war against each other over resources) for a reason. Get in-between them at your own risk.
.
-
are you saying we can't win the war because we are not agressive enough?
That's exactly how I feel! If we're to win this war we have to be just as ruthless as our enemy! History is enough to make me believe that. Our politicians and the moonbat left will tie our hands. They proved it in the Vietnam war!
-
either way it will take him three days to say anything
You got that right! He has to wait and see which way the wind blows before he makes any decision. Worst Pres I can remember for making decisions on the spur of the moment.
The word LimpDick comes to mind.
-
Ooops. Looks like Al-Qaeda made a huge mistake with China. :evillaugh:
-
Ooops. Looks like Al-Qaeda made a huge mistake with China. :evillaugh:
No no no....I want them to piss off the Chinese.
I figure there's a billion and a half muslims, a billion Chinese and they need to fight each other. I figure by the time they destroy each other....... Obama will be gone...... we'll have a real leader again and we can step in and rule the world. [pinky and the brain/mode/off]
-
are you saying we can't win the war because we are not agressive enough?
Yes. If your not aggressive enough to go after the heart of your enemy, then that enemy will always be there.
-
They'll be begging for a waterboarding just to cool off the electrical burns.
-
I'd pay good money to watch a billion screaming Chinamen go apeshit on al-Qaeda.
-
[pinky and the brain/mode/off]
Now that's funny!!!!!
-
They'll be begging for a waterboarding just to cool off the electrical burns.
:bow:
-
I'd pay good money to watch a billion screaming Chinamen go apeshit on al-Qaeda.
Me too. It probably would make a WWE pay per view look small.
-
Me too. It probably would make a WWE pay per view look small.
It would make a WWE PPV look like a bunch of Cub Scouts roasting marshmellows over a camp fire....