The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on June 08, 2009, 11:02:41 AM

Title: Still can't talk about ****suckers in the military...
Post by: dutch508 on June 08, 2009, 11:02:41 AM
Quote
NorthCarolina (1000+ posts)        Mon Jun-08-09 10:25 AM
Link at DU (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=221x136260)

Court rejects challenge to 'don't ask, don't tell'
 The Supreme Court has turned down a challenge to the Pentagon policy forbidding gays and lesbians from serving openly in the military, granting a request by the Obama administration.

The court said Monday that it will not hear an appeal from former Army Capt. James Pietrangelo II, who was dismissed under the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

The federal appeals court in Boston earlier threw out a lawsuit filed by Pietrangelo and 11 other veterans. He was the only member of that group who asked the high court to rule that the Clinton-era policy is unconstitutional.

http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2009/06/08/...

 
CLINTON ERA Policy...

Quote
WillBowden  (1000+ posts)        Mon Jun-08-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, we have a friend in the White House...
 If by friend you mean someone who'll sell you down the river.

 
You should understand by now that muslims don't like teh ghey.

Quote
RaleighNCDUer  (1000+ posts)      Mon Jun-08-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Consider the source - 
 Townhall is a RW POS, and the article is designed to 1) celebrate a defeat of a LGBT case, and 2) make Obama responsible for it to weaken the Democratic coalition.

There is more to this story, and we are not going to hear it from Townhall.


The DU equivalent to " LA LA LA LA LA LA I CAN"T HEAR YOU!!!"

Title: Re: Still can't talk about ****suckers in the military...
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on June 08, 2009, 11:12:15 AM
Quote
RaleighNCDUer  (1000+ posts)      Mon Jun-08-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Consider the source -
 Townhall is a RW POS, and the article is designed to 1) celebrate a defeat of a LGBT case, and 2) make Obama responsible for it to weaken the Democratic coalition.

There is more to this story, and we are not going to hear it from Townhall.

Wait, the story will be completely different if it comes from RawStory or the HuffingtonPost? :mental:
Title: Re: Still can't talk about ****suckers in the military...
Post by: NHSparky on June 08, 2009, 11:19:53 AM
No, DUmmies.  You can TALK about ****suckers.  You just can't BE one if you have the same plumbing.
Title: Re: Still can't talk about ****suckers in the military...
Post by: JohnnyReb on June 08, 2009, 11:54:39 AM
No, DUmmies.  You can TALK about ****suckers.  You just can't BE one if you have the same plumbing.

YOU WANNA DO WHAT ???....here...suck on this rifle barrel until you get some relief.
Title: Re: Still can't talk about ****suckers in the military...
Post by: lastparker on June 08, 2009, 03:35:02 PM
Wait, the story will be completely different if it comes from RawStory or the HuffingtonPost? :mental:

Not completely different.  Just minor stuff, like they'd say:

Quote
He was the only member of that group who asked the high court to rule that the Clinton-era policy upheld by the Bush administration is unconstitutional.

Just little differences like that.
Title: Re: Still can't talk about ****suckers in the military...
Post by: BlueStateSaint on June 08, 2009, 04:59:33 PM
YOU WANNA DO WHAT ???....here...suck on this rifle barrel until you get some relief.

Yeah . . . it'll "shoot its' wad," alright . . .