The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Toastedturningtidelegs on May 28, 2009, 06:07:08 AM
-
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Thu May-28-09 01:39 AM
Original message
Is it not odd that Obama never asked Sotomayor about Roe v Wade?
I love her story and she seems like a lovely person, but I find it odd that Roe v Wade never even came up. Is Obama relying on her to make a prayerful decision about choice?
====
The officials also say she was not asked about privacy rights or Roe v.Wade. They say the fact that she is not on record on these issues was not a factor in her selection.
http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline/2009/05/behind-the...
"Still I sent up my prayer, wondering where it had to go; with heaven full of astronauts and the Lord on death row..."
How friggin funny would it be if she turned out to be pro-life? :lmao: I think "my head" would explode with laughter :-)http://http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5733719
-
There are some things that simply don`t need to be asked of people...you just know the answer first.
I have a better chance of winning Mega Millions one night and Powerball the next then there is of her being pro life.
-
Linky no work :(
Better yet I have a better chance of becoming pregnant then her being prolife :lmao:
-
There are some things that simply don`t need to be asked of people...you just know the answer first.
I have a better chance of winning Mega Millions one night and Powerball the next then there is of her being pro life.
Carl my point was if Obama had assumed that and got a big surprise!
-
Carl my point was if Obama had assumed that and got a big surprise!
Just like homo's having "gaydar", Liberals have "libdar", they "know" these things.
-
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5733719
-
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Thu May-28-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
29. My take is that they didn't want it to come up during the confirmation hearings that she was
appointed because she was pro-Roe v. Wade. If she wasn't asked, the repukes don't have that bit of ammunition against her.
Must suck to have to have to be cryptic about what you believe in because you fear that your beliefs could be ammunition against you. I've never seen a pro lifer shy about their beliefs.
-
Didn't I hear she was Catholic? What's with "Catholics" not following the teachings
from Rome?
Oh, that' right. They're enlightened....... :banghead:
-
Didn't I hear she was Catholic? What's with "Catholics" not following the teachings
from Rome?
Oh, that' right. They're enlightened....... :banghead:
Two different types of Catholics...the cafeteria type and the ones who do follow doctrine!
-
Two different types of Catholics...the cafeteria type and the ones who do follow doctrine!
Understand. I just thought "you" didn't have that option? What are "reform" Catholics called?
<fill in snide remark here>! ,)
-
Understand. I just thought "you" didn't have that option? What are "reform" Catholics called?
<fill in snide remark here>! ,)
liberals! :-)
-
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Thu May-28-09 01:39 AM
Original message
Is it not odd that Obama never asked Sotomayor about Roe v Wade?
Not if you already know what the answer is.
-
Must suck to have to have to be cryptic about what you believe in because you fear that your beliefs could be ammunition against you.
Unless you are a Republican niminee for ANYTHING...then you have to not only be crystal clear on what you believe right down to the last comma...you can't ever have changed your mind either.