The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Toastedturningtidelegs on May 26, 2009, 12:53:56 PM
-
God this is getting really good! :-)
Ioo (1000+ posts) Tue May-26-09 01:45 PM
Original message
I think those in CA should get the following things on the ballot, given what we know
I know most of these things are mean, but it is okay, because like those that voted for PROP 8 were not effected by their vote... so...
- Prop 39 - Anyone that has had the "change" in life shall not marry
- Prop 92 - All Hispanics can not marry unless they ask Joe Smith of LA
- Prop 31 - All People with Brown eyes can not marry Blue Eyed people because the mob said so...
- Prop 65 - If you were not born in the US, you can not marry people who are from CA
- Prop 59 - The Disabled should not allowed to be married unless they get approval by vote of the people, marriage by marriage
- Prop 54 - Asians can only marry other Asians.
- Prop 99 - White people can not ask Black people to marry, but Black people can ask White people.
All of these sounds dumb as hell!!! But given what the courts did today, all valid.
WELCOME TO CA, WHERE THE MOB RULES!
:lmao: :lmao: :rotf:http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=221x133285
-
Oh my.
The poor igloo primitive, all bent out of shape.
-
Their Tears of surrow and anger are so sweat to my tongue :lmao: :-)
-
This will only get better.
They will howl to Lord O and he will:
A) rebuff them
B) meddle and touch off a 10th Amendment crisis that only emboldens our side.
-
The DUmp really is as fun as a barrel of monkeys.
-
- Prop 54 - Asians can only marry other Asians.
NO WAY, we would run out of hot Eurasian chicks!!!
:ohnoes:
-
What a bunch of losers...had the vote turned out the other way and it had been upheld on that count they wouldn't have been calling the voters of CA 'mob rule'. All it affirms, twirly whirlys is that people believe that marriage is between one man and one woman. This is not a hard concept to understand. It does not mean you can not have a negotiated contract with two men or two women, but you can not call that marriage. Marriage already has a long standing definition that is, apparently, not open for change. this is also a victory for the English language seeing how 'gay' had already been hijacked. Thankfully, now, 30 years from now we hopefully won't hear the word 'marriage' and conjur up visions of a bulldyke and her lipstick when the word is mentioned. On that note, even if you hijacked marriage it really wouldn't have changed anything. People have a way of adjusting to move away from the inconsistency 'gay marriage' represents. Straight people would have probably started rejecting the term and you still would not have fit into the new square hole that would spring up to describe male/female unions. Male/female unions also would have probably started opting not to have legal recognition if it meant that they had to share the title with any two individuals who wanted to form a union. Human beings are funny that way.
-
NO WAY, we would run out of hot Eurasian chicks!!!
:ohnoes:
No shit! Have you seen the boobies on those babes?!!!!!
-
If I was a gay man in Califormia today, I'd grab me a lesbian and go get a marriage license just to show those mob ruling bigots that I can get married whether they like it or not!
-
Bunny, I think he'll ignore them. He will sit high on his horse and pretend nothing's there. Lurking gaywads: Your Messiah doesn't like you. He's probably repulsed by you, like the black voters of California.
-
No shit! Have you seen the boobies on those babes?!!!!!
Yesh.
:drool: