The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: TheSarge on May 26, 2009, 07:45:32 AM

Title: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: TheSarge on May 26, 2009, 07:45:32 AM
(http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2009/05/02/amd_sonia_sotomayor.jpg)

President Obama plans to announce his nominee to the Supreme Court Tuesday morning, FOX News has confirmed.

The announcement, set for 10:15 a.m. ET, comes after the president met with his legal team Monday at the White House to discuss the selection. He also read through written material on potential picks over the weekend at Camp David, according to a White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

The president has kept a tight lid on the identity of the nominee. As of midnight, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid had not been given any notice of whom Obama had picked.

Obama's nominee would replace outgoing Justice David Souter if confirmed. The presumptive short list includes several women, including federal appeals court judges Sonia Sotomayor and Diane Wood. 



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/26/obama-announce-supreme-court-nominee-tuesday-morning/
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: thundley4 on May 26, 2009, 08:06:23 AM
Great, this is that judge who is on tape saying something about making laws from the bench.

ETA:  Not making laws exactly, but making policy.
[youtube=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfC99LrrM2Q[/youtube]
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: NHSparky on May 26, 2009, 08:14:12 AM
<sniff, sniff>...I smell filibuster.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: BlueStateSaint on May 26, 2009, 08:29:51 AM
<sniff, sniff>...I smell filibuster.

So do I.  One can hope.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Sam Adams on May 26, 2009, 08:35:07 AM
The pundits are saying she is an intellectual lightweight. So, she should be easily rolled by Alito, Roberts and Scalia. Maybe they will even convert her! That would be way kool.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: TheSarge on May 26, 2009, 08:36:30 AM
The pundits are saying she is an intellectual lightweight.

So she'll blend in well with the rest of the Administration?
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: NHSparky on May 26, 2009, 08:39:17 AM
So she'll blend in well with the rest of the Administration?

Only if she's been cheating on her taxes.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on May 26, 2009, 09:04:53 AM
<sniff, sniff>...I smell filibuster.

That would probably require a lot more balls than the Senate Republicans can muster.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: DixieBelle on May 26, 2009, 09:06:43 AM
They better find their ________. :-(

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: thundley4 on May 26, 2009, 09:08:01 AM
That would probably require a lot more balls than the Senate Republicans can muster.

They're saying that on FNC this morning that there may not be enough support for a filibuster, but Senator Kyl has talked about using procedural rules to delay/block confirmation.
Title: Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court
Post by: RobJohnson on May 26, 2009, 09:34:38 AM
(http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090526/capt.3a6116a90e0a49d8be5d717f3f8467cd.obama_supreme_court_ny113.jpg?x=213&y=326&xc=1&yc=1&wc=268&hc=410&q=85&sig=EaG1kyXMeM1hCdmh2CA6.w--)



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. President Barack Obama has chosen appeals court Judge Sonia Sotomayor to fill the U.S. Supreme Court seat being vacated by liberal Justice David Souter, a White House official said on Tuesday.

More (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090526/ts_nm/us_usa_court_nominee_5)
Title: Re: Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court
Post by: BadCat on May 26, 2009, 09:40:56 AM
We all knew he'd pick a communist.
He did.
Title: Re: Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court
Post by: 5412 on May 26, 2009, 11:40:10 AM
We all knew he'd pick a communist.
He did.

Hi,

I am in the middle of reading Mark Levin's book, "Liberty and Tyranny".  He really documents how Roosevelt basically trashed the Constitution by first trying to pack the Supreme Court, then he did something no other president in history has done.  Since the days of George Washington, every president had retired after their second term, Roosevelt did not and was elected four times.   According to the book he virtually intimidated the Supreme Court, and then over time packed them with liberal judges who were no longer interested in the Constitution.

This is right out of the Roosevelt playbook.  The lady will be on the bench.  At the same time, the Republicans should do everything they can to delay, hamper, filibuster this one......because likely BO will have more than one nominee and they have to make it a difficult, painful process. 

I prey for the day the Republicans have a huge majority and they can actually impeach a Surpreme Court judge for not following the Constitution.  Who was the judge who cited the French Constitution in writing his opinion?  He should have been impeached right on the spot....

regards,
5412
Title: Re: Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court
Post by: JohnnyReb on May 26, 2009, 11:46:50 AM
Hi,

I am in the middle of reading Mark Levin's book, "Liberty and Tyranny".  He really documents how Roosevelt basically trashed the Constitution by first trying to pack the Supreme Court, then he did something no other president in history has done.  Since the days of George Washington, every president had retired after their second term, Roosevelt did not and was elected four times.   According to the book he virtually intimidated the Supreme Court, and then over time packed them with liberal judges who were no longer interested in the Constitution.

This is right out of the Roosevelt playbook.  The lady will be on the bench.  At the same time, the Republicans should do everything they can to delay, hamper, filibuster this one......because likely BO will have more than one nominee and they have to make it a difficult, painful process. 

I prey for the day the Republicans have a huge majority and they can actually impeach a Surpreme Court judge for not following the Constitution.  Who was the judge who cited the French Constitution in writing his opinion?  He should have been impeached right on the spot....
regards,
5412

I think that was Ruth Bader-Ginsberg and I don't give a flying f*** if I spelled name right or not.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: The Village Idiot on May 26, 2009, 11:47:34 AM
Radical leftwing activist judge who is anti-Constitution and believes her job is to make the law.


wonderful.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: The Village Idiot on May 26, 2009, 11:48:38 AM
<sniff, sniff>...I smell filibuster.

I don't.

I smell Snowe, Collins and other Republicans rushing to support her.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: BlueStateSaint on May 26, 2009, 11:52:08 AM
That would probably require a lot more balls than the Senate Republicans can muster.

But, because she's taking a seat that was occupied by a stealth liberal, she won't change the makeup of the Court--but she will write some really off-the-wall opinions.  And, upon further review (three words you don't want to hear from an NFL referee), you are probably right, in that the Senate Republicans won't want to, much less be able to, mount a fillibuster.

The upcoming mid-terms will give the fillibuster back to the Republicans, and the 2012 elections will give the Republicans a supermajority--which is also close to the amount of votes needed for a successful impeachment.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris_ on May 26, 2009, 12:02:21 PM
<sniff, sniff>...I smell filibuster.
I don't.

I smell McCain, Graham-nasty, Snowe, Collins and other Republicans rushing to support her.

Fixorated. :II:  (gotta get the leaders of the bend and scrape caucus included by name)
Title: Re: Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court
Post by: thundley4 on May 26, 2009, 12:05:33 PM
Hi,

I am in the middle of reading Mark Levin's book, "Liberty and Tyranny".  He really documents how Roosevelt basically trashed the Constitution by first trying to pack the Supreme Court, then he did something no other president in history has done.  Since the days of George Washington, every president had retired after their second term, Roosevelt did not and was elected four times.   According to the book he virtually intimidated the Supreme Court, and then over time packed them with liberal judges who were no longer interested in the Constitution.

This is right out of the Roosevelt playbook.  The lady will be on the bench.  At the same time, the Republicans should do everything they can to delay, hamper, filibuster this one......because likely BO will have more than one nominee and they have to make it a difficult, painful process. 

I prey for the day the Republicans have a huge majority and they can actually impeach a Surpreme Court judge for not following the Constitution.  Who was the judge who cited the French Constitution in writing his opinion?  He should have been impeached right on the spot....

regards,
5412
Liberals Sketch Out Dreams and Limits for Supreme Court (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124328690467052025.html)
Just a little snippet from the article.
Quote
In the 1980s, conservatives popularized "originalism," which asserts that the only legitimate way to apply the Constitution is as 18th century Americans would have understood the text. Liberal approaches -- treating the Constitution as a "living document," as Mr. Obama suggests -- invite judges to cloak their personal views as law, they argue.

"What does a judge consult, if not the original understanding of the text? What binds the biases of judge?" Justice Scalia said in a 1996 speech. "The whole purpose of the Constitution is to prevent a future society from doing what it wants to do," he said. "To change, to evolve, you don't need a constitution, all you need is a legislature and a ballot box."

In a "2020" entry, the book's co-editor, Reva Siegel, and Yale colleague Robert Post argue that conservatives disguise their own preferences as those of the founders, and ignore the fact that courts traditionally have read broad constitutional phrases in line with contemporary practice.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: The Village Idiot on May 26, 2009, 12:20:33 PM
I don't.

I smell McCain, Graham-nasty, Snowe, Collins and other Republicans rushing to support her.


Fixorated. :II:  (gotta get the leaders of the bend and scrape caucus included by name)

Thanks, didn't mean to pick on the femalian flippers
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris on May 26, 2009, 12:55:23 PM
Apparently, white people make inferior judges...
Quote
As one would expect for a speech to La Raza, Sotomayor stated,

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life."

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/politics/15judge.text.html
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Tess Anderson on May 26, 2009, 12:55:51 PM
I can't believe he went ahead with her after that remark of hers was made on tape. Guess that just goes to show the remaining people that didn't want to believe how radical Barack Hussein Obama is wrong. This woman is a racist to boot, ask any New Haven firefighter. No stops should be pulled to get rid of this black-robed moonbat.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: miskie on May 26, 2009, 01:38:29 PM
I suspect Obama is hoping there will be filibuster/denial action against this one. Then the Dems can go on about how 'Rethuglikkkans hate hispanics.' -- I mean why not ? It's how Obama became President.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris_ on May 26, 2009, 01:42:18 PM
I don't.

I smell Snowe, Collins and other Republicans rushing to support her.

I just heard Jeff Sessions (R-AL) in a sound bite at the top of the hour news on the radio.  Apparently he's first in line to kiss her ass.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: shorty on May 26, 2009, 02:00:08 PM
This choice is horrible. As an conservative American Hispanic I have known many Hispanics like Sotomayor. She is type of person who plays the race card to get what she wants and people like her and Barack Obama are the reason our society can't advance.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris on May 26, 2009, 02:24:58 PM
This choice is horrible. As an conservative American Hispanic I have known many Hispanics like Sotomayor. She is type of person who plays the race card to get what she wants and people like her and Barack Obama are the reason our society can't advance.

This woman would be a disaster.
Quote
In 1999, the village of Port Chester, N.Y., established a "redevelopment area" and gave its designated developer, Gregg Wasser, a virtual blank check to condemn property within it. In 2003, property owners Bart Didden and Dominick Bologna approached Wasser for permission to build a CVS pharmacy on land they own inside the zone. His response: Either pay me $800,000 or give me a 50% partnership interest in the CVS project. Wasser threatened to have the local government condemn the land if his demands weren't met. When the owners refused to oblige, their property was condemned the next day.

Didden and Bologna challenged the condemnation in federal court, on the grounds that it was not for a "public use," as the Fifth Amendment requires. Their view, quite simply, was that out-and-out extortion does not qualify as a public use. Nonetheless, the 2d Circuit . . . upheld this flexing of political muscle.
http://volokh.com/posts/1243364120.shtml
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: shorty on May 26, 2009, 03:05:52 PM
She will be a disaster. I think the worst thing going in our country is that people like her Obama and Bill Richarson have power in this country.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris_ on May 26, 2009, 03:16:28 PM
She will be a disaster. I think the worst thing going in our country is that people like her Obama and Bill Richarson have power in this country.

Ultimately she is no worse than the asshat - David Souter - she is replacing.  She may actually be a little better even, in that she apparently isn't as skilled at couching her opinions in neutral, lovey, hopey, changey speak as he was (remember, he was appointed by Bush(41) who aparently didn't think he had the testicular fortitude to get someone other than a barking moonbat through a Democrat-controlled Senate).  That being the case, it'll be harder for TOTUS or the Senate to pass her off as anything other than the activist moonbat she is.

It's not like John Roberts was shot down by ghey rioters on the courthouse steps, folks.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: djones520 on May 26, 2009, 03:24:03 PM
Huh...  look what I just found on Drudge...  democrats being racist?  Say it ain't so.

Quote
November 7, 2001/To: Senator Durbin
"The groups singled out three--Jeffrey Sutton (6th Circuit); Priscilla Owen (5th Circuit); and Caroline [sic] Kuhl (9th Circuit)--as a potential nominee for a contentious hearing early next year, with a [sic] eye to voting him or her down in Committee. They also identified Miguel Estrada (D.C. Circuit) as especially dangerous, because he has a minimal paper trail, he is Latino, and the White House seems to be grooming him for a Supreme Court appointment. They want to hold Estrada off as long as possible."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110004305
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Tucker on May 26, 2009, 06:43:15 PM
Sotomayor’s Notable Court Opinions and Articles.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/05/26/us/0526-scotus.html
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: 5412 on May 26, 2009, 07:29:52 PM
Sotomayor’s Notable Court Opinions and Articles.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/05/26/us/0526-scotus.html

Hi,

This is courtesy of the NYT.

“I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life,” said Judge Sotomayor, who is now considered to be near the top of President Obama’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees.

Now I would like to ask a reasonable person this one question.  Substitute the word white for Latina in the first part of the sentence, and put Latina back in the second part and tell me if a judge who said that would have any chance at being approved by the senate, much less even being nominated.....

I am so damn sick of the double standard.  Of course when it comes to giving illegals amnesty and citizenship you know darn well where this "empathetic" lady would stand.

regards,
5412

Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: rich_t on May 26, 2009, 07:31:30 PM
Isn't her reversal rate about 80% as a judge?  I think Rush said something along those lines today.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris on May 26, 2009, 07:58:50 PM
Isn't her reversal rate about 80% as a judge?  I think Rush said something along those lines today.

I heard the same thing... I tried to find it earlier today.  This is the transcript for today's show:
Quote
One more little bit of information here about Appellate Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor: "The Supreme Court has reversed Judge Sotomayor in four instances where it granted certiorari to review an opinion she authored." Now, I say this again: "The Supreme Court has reversed Judge Sotomayor in four instances where it granted certiorari to review an opinion she authored. "In three of these reversals, the Court held that Judge Sotomayor erred in her statutory interpretation," meaning she goofed up on the law. She was overturned four times when she wrote the opinion, the lead opinion, and in three of the four cases the Supreme Court held that she erred in her statutory interpretation.  The cases are Knight v. C.I.R., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit, New York Times, Inc. v. Tasini, and Correctional Servs. Corp. v. Malesko. The cases are 2008, 2006, 2001, and 2001.  So there you have it. 

She's about as qualified to be a Supreme Court justice as Obama is to be the President.  Scratch that, she may actually be a legal citizen.

I wonder if she remembered to pay her taxes.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: thundley4 on May 26, 2009, 08:00:16 PM
There is also an upcoming case for the USSC in which she let stand a lower court ruling involving reverse discrimination.  
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris on May 26, 2009, 08:04:43 PM
There is also an upcoming case for the USSC in which she let stand a lower court ruling involving reverse discrimination.  

Wouldn't she have to excuse herself from the case?  Not that I actually expect her to, but I believe Scalia (or Roberts) had to do so recently.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: thundley4 on May 26, 2009, 08:45:32 PM
Wouldn't she have to excuse herself from the case?  Not that I actually expect her to, but I believe Scalia (or Roberts) had to do so recently.

I think the case may reach the USSC before Souter retires. It involves a few firefighters from New Haven not being promoted after passing the exams.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Rebel on May 26, 2009, 10:03:49 PM
Here's your FIRST Hispanic judge:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_N._Cardozo

Quote
Cardozo was born in New York City, the son of Rebecca Washington (née Nathan) and Albert Jacob Cardozo. Both Cardozo's maternal grandparents, Sara Seixas and Isaac Mendes Seixas Nathan, and his paternal grandparents, Ellen Hart and Michael H. Cardozo, were Sephardi Jews; their families immigrated from England before the American Revolution, and were descended from Jews who left the Iberian Peninsula for Holland during the Inquisition. Cardozo family tradition held that their ancestors were Marranos from Portugal, although Cardozo's ancestry has not been firmly traced to Portugal.

it is NOT this leftist loon who thinks it's OK to discriminate against whitey and that Appeals Court justices make policy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hispanic

Quote
Hispanic (Spanish: hispano, hispánico) is a term that historically denoted relation to the ancient Hispania (geographically coinciding with the Iberian Peninsula). During the modern era it took on a more limited meaning relating to the contemporary nation of Spain.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Tess Anderson on May 29, 2009, 12:55:52 PM
She's a La Raza operative??? La RAZA???

And, according to "our" RNC chairman Michael Steele via RCP, we need to:

Quote
While guest hosting Bill Bennett's morning radio program, RNC Chairman Michael Steele said Republicans should stop "slamming and ramming" on Judge Sonia Sotomayor. Steele added it is important to understand the "historical aspect" of her nomination.

It's all over. I don't see how this country can ever recover now.
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: The Village Idiot on May 29, 2009, 12:59:57 PM
She's a La Raza operative??? La RAZA???

And, according to "our" RNC chairman Michael Steele via RCP, we need to:

It's all over. I don't see how this country can ever recover now.

The opposition party needs to oppose, otherwise whats the point?
Title: Re: Obama to Announce Sotomayor As Supreme Court Nominee
Post by: Chris_ on May 29, 2009, 02:04:57 PM
The opposition party needs to oppose, otherwise whats the point?

There is no Opposition Party in America.  Just as in the days of Comrade Franklin Roosevelt's administration, the Republicans are the party of "Me too".