The Conservative Cave

The Bar => The Lounge => Topic started by: thundley4 on May 18, 2009, 10:41:28 PM

Title: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: thundley4 on May 18, 2009, 10:41:28 PM: (http://www.mosnews.com/photos/58/1758_400x300.jpg)
Quote
Two Russian tourists who challenged a Florida law prohibiting sexual relationship with a porcupine have had to undergo a lengthy treatment for genital inflammation.

Anton, 32, and Yevgeny, 30, residents of St. Petersburg, were spending their vacation in the United States with a group of friends, Life.ru website reports.

At some point in their journey, the two got hold of a booklet listing the weirdest US laws. Since they were in Florida, their attention was drawn to a Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines.

After a good deal of whiskey, the Russians felt curious about what might have prompted the law, and went in search of the animal.

Within one hour, a porcupine was found, and Anton and Yevgeny were drunk and brave enough to take off their pants and approach it.
Link (http://www.mosnews.com/weird/2009/05/18/porcupine/)

An extremely PRICKLY situation.
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Chris on May 18, 2009, 10:47:47 PM: Russian porcupines must be different. :(
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Tantal on May 18, 2009, 11:00:32 PM: Dammit, Bijou! Please try to keep the Eurotrash on your side of the pond. :-)
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Lord Undies on May 18, 2009, 11:01:50 PM: Quill they ever get over it?
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Celtic Rose on May 18, 2009, 11:17:46 PM: How drunk would a guy have to be to try to have sex with an animal covered in barbed needles? :thatsright:
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Chris on May 18, 2009, 11:18:24 PM: Quote from: Celtic Rose on May 18, 2009, 11:17:46 PM
How drunk would a guy have to be to try to have sex with an animal covered in barbed needles? :thatsright:

Some guys have to pay for that kind of treatment.
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Randy on May 19, 2009, 12:27:43 AM: Quote from: Chris on May 18, 2009, 11:18:24 PM
Some guys have to pay for that kind of treatment.

Oh I get the feeling these guys are paying alright.

:-)
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Chris_ on May 19, 2009, 05:53:32 AM: Quote from: Celtic Rose on May 18, 2009, 11:17:46 PM
How drunk would a guy have to be to try to have sex with an animal covered in barbed needles? :thatsright:
You'd have to ask Bubba Clinton.
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: JohnnyReb on May 19, 2009, 06:09:47 AM: Bet they understand the point of that law now.
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Happy Fun Ball on May 19, 2009, 06:54:08 AM: So, let's see if I got this now... A pair of pickled pilgrims picked a pack of pricklers to poke in their peckers. Is that about right?
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: Mr Mannn on May 19, 2009, 07:51:25 AM: Quote from: Happy Fun Ball on May 19, 2009, 06:54:08 AM
So, let's see if I got this now... A pair of pickled pilgrims picked a pack of pricklers to poke in their peckers. Is that about right?
H5 for that. :lmao:
Title: Re: 2 Russian tourists challenge Florida law prohibiting sex with porcupines
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on May 19, 2009, 09:00:06 AM: Quote from: Celtic Rose on May 18, 2009, 11:17:46 PM
How drunk would a guy have to be to try to have sex with an animal covered in barbed needles? :thatsright:

I would have thought the answer'd be "So drunk they couldn't actually get it up," but I guess they've disproved that.