The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on May 15, 2009, 06:24:03 AM

Title: Pedro Picasso would never lie
Post by: franksolich on May 15, 2009, 06:24:03 AM

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5659396

Oh my.

Quote

Atman  (1000+ posts)        Fri May-15-09 07:15 AM
Original message
 
The CIA would never lie!

Oh wait...it's what they do, by design. We call them "spooks" and revealing anything about what they're up to is a crime (unless you're a VP seeking retribution). This whole line of defense by the Torture Party is ridiculous at best. Of course the CIA would lie! They would destroy tapes, they would invent evidence, they would assassinate people...but Boner and Scarborough and the rest of the torture defenders are feigning shock that anyone could think a SPY AGENCY might not be totally forthcoming about their activities.

This is brand-new; no primitives at the bonfire yet.

I'll check it later, for primitive comments.

You know, I stalked Ruth Bader Ginsberg last night.

I read a piece she wrote about her childhood.

By Pedro Picasso's definition, reading something the Supreme Court justice wrote is "stalking" her.

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso would never lie
Post by: Carl on May 15, 2009, 06:34:42 AM

Now they are finally going to admit that desk job super secret spy girl Plame and her attention whore husband Joe might not be all that credible?

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso would never lie
Post by: USA4ME on May 15, 2009, 07:31:37 AM

Wow!  You'd have to be a real idiot to try and defend Pelosi's lying adventure the last few weeks.

Ergo, Pedro & the other primitives.

.

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso would never lie
Post by: AllosaursRus on May 15, 2009, 12:50:55 PM

Hey AssMan! You're a frikkin' idiot! Hahahahahahahahahahaha!

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso would never lie
Post by: BannedFromDU on May 15, 2009, 01:11:26 PM

Quote from: Carl on May 15, 2009, 06:34:42 AM

Now they are finally going to admit that desk job super secret spy girl Plame and her attention whore husband Joe might not be all that credible?

    Now THAT will play! H5

Title: Re: Pedro Picasso would never lie
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on May 15, 2009, 01:22:19 PM

Poor Pedo Picasso

Nevermind the fact that Nancy has emabrrassed herself and her party with changing her story more often than Monica Lewinsky had to change dresses; we'll let his willful gullibility slide...for now.

By this time next week Nancy's theatrics are going to be costing Dear Leader dearly as he tries to prevent a coup of non-performance by defense and intel operatives too terrified to do their jobs. As the intel dries-up and he grows increasingly ignorant (hard to imagine, I know, but there you have it) he will want to reassure him he really does want to know when the next attack is coming and he won't prosecute them if they just tell him..."pretty please with sugar on it. I promise to make the stupid scrunt shut the @#$% up."

Then you will see Obama confront Nancy.

And by doing so he will signal that congress was indeed told of the sessions and that their silence was the law of consent.

It will be tortured-truth Nancy vs Yokel-Oh-No-Bama

Poor Pedo will be forced to choose between his precious fantasies or his unwavering zeal.

 :cheersmate: