The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on May 06, 2009, 04:35:53 PM

Title: primitives outsmart themselves
Post by: franksolich on May 06, 2009, 04:35:53 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5606248

Oh my.

Quote
Bonn1997  (804 posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:13 PM
Original message

New Poll: Specter (D) 41, Ridge (R) 48

I know it's early but did we just out-smart ourselves and end up with a weak 2010 candidate against Ridge?

Quote
Tierra_y_Libertad  (1000+ posts)        Wed May-06-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
 
1. "If you run a Republican against a Republican, you elect a Republican." Harry Truman

Quote
Teaser  (1000+ posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
 
8. I just need more info

how hard were leaners pushed, stuff like that.

I suspect Arlen will win, just out of habit. The Dem machine will push him over the top, assuming Ridge is the adversary. Which is a probability I place at less than 50%.

AHA.  A primitive finally admitted to the existence of corrupt Democrat political machines that create fraud in elections.

About time; they've been around since Aaron Burr.

Quote
peace frog  (1000+ posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
 
5. *We* didn't select Specter

He selected us. We, however, can select another nominee in 2010 (PA calling Sestak, come in Sestak).

Who's this shaslik guy this piece of toad primitive wants?

It seems reasonable to assume he's some obscure far-left fringe extremist, much like that Pete Comejo guy out in California Doug's ex-wife was always getting tumescent over.

Quote
Bonn1997  (804 posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
 
7. Yeah but I think being the incumbent D and having name rec. gives you a big advantage

I know it didn't work that way with Lieberman but I still think on average the incumbent D with name rec has a big advantage.

Quote
peace frog  (1000+ posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
 
10. Not necessarily

Ask the Dem voters in PA if they feel more loyal to a long-established Dem like Sestak, or to a turncoat-for-personal-gain who does not share their views by a long shot like Specter.

Quote
bullimiami  (1000+ posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
 
9. i dont think spector will be winning another primary in any party.

Even if Pa Kettle, as expected, emerges from the White House to campaign for him?

Quote
w4rma (1000+ posts)        Wed May-06-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
 
11. Spector is toast in *any* general election. He loses against any Democratic nominee too.

Even if Pa Kettle, as expected, emerges from the White House to campaign for him?

Quote
DU AdBot (1000+ posts)      Wed May 06th 2009, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message

Specter

Huge selection, great deals on Specter
items.
Title: Re: primitives outsmart themselves
Post by: Chris_ on May 06, 2009, 06:40:53 PM
Quote
Quote
peace frog  (1000+ posts)      Wed May-06-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
 
5. *We* didn't select Specter

He selected us. We, however, can select another nominee in 2010 (PA calling Sestak, come in Sestak).

Who's this shaslik guy this piece of toad primitive wants?

It seems reasonable to assume he's some obscure far-left fringe extremist, much like that Pete Comejo guy out in California Doug's ex-wife was always getting tumescent over.

I think he was on Land of the Lost in the 70s.
(http://i569.photobucket.com/albums/ss137/Bucket_pail/Sleestak.jpg)
Title: Re: primitives outsmart themselves
Post by: BlueStateSaint on May 06, 2009, 08:37:25 PM
Joe Sestak is a former Navy vice admiral, IIRC.