The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: jinxmchue on April 28, 2009, 12:47:10 PM

Title: Grade my performance
Post by: jinxmchue on April 28, 2009, 12:47:10 PM

I posted this a view days ago:

http://shockandblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/perez-hilton-just-proved-my-law.html

And am having fun in my comments putting a couple of my liberal readers to shame:

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/jinxmchue/5624086293946429939/

I think I'm doing really well, but I'd like others' mostly impartial opinions.  Let me know how I'm doing.

Edit: Yeah, it's a lengthy amount of comments to read.  Sorry.

Title: Re: Grade my performance
Post by: jinxmchue on April 28, 2009, 01:20:31 PM

I just realized that this vote could be interpreted sexually.   :thatsright:

Title: Re: Grade my performance
Post by: Flame on April 28, 2009, 01:28:45 PM

Quote from: jinxmchue on April 28, 2009, 01:20:31 PM

I just realized that this vote could be interpreted sexually.   :thatsright:

By the CC crowd?  Nah....never!   :rotf: :rotf:

Title: Re: Grade my performance
Post by: jinxmchue on April 28, 2009, 11:51:53 PM

Okay, which of you jerks voted F?

Title: Re: Grade my performance
Post by: jinxmchue on April 29, 2009, 12:21:40 AM

Oh, fer ****'s sake!  This comment was posted by a long time liberal foil:

"No one who is legally capable of applying for a marriage license is ever turned away, therefore it is obviously a right."

 :thatsright:

How stupid do you have to be?  Honestly!

Title: Re: Grade my performance
Post by: Chris_ on April 29, 2009, 12:37:15 AM

Quote from: jinxmchue on April 29, 2009, 12:21:40 AM

Oh, fer ****'s sake!  This comment was posted by a long time liberal foil:

"No one who is legally capable of applying for a marriage license is ever turned away, therefore it is obviously a right."

 :thatsright:

How stupid do you have to be?  Honestly!

The fact that you have to APPLY FOR IT IN THE FIRST DAMNED PLACE say's it's not a "right".

Title: Re: Grade my performance
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on April 29, 2009, 06:21:32 AM

The internally inconsistent argument is the staple of liberal rationalism.

Take the movie, V: for Vengeance, for example. That movie was hyped-up to be all the cheap caricatures of the Bush admin the left could conjure. What made the villian so villianous? He dictated by his own hand what was the law and he ruthlessly prosecuted any who dared disagree with him even using such things as torture to compel the reluctant.

Who was the hero?

Apparently it was some guy who dictated the law by his own hand and ruthlessly prosecuted anyone who disagreed with him. Hell, he even tortured the semi-cute chick but I guess it's OK because when he did it his motive was to say, "Woudn't this suck if it hapened to you?" which actually it did.

What a pant-load and yet this movie is worshipped as speaking truth to power.


PS_ you should should point out that if they're against religious based laws they might want to rethink abolition.