http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5552010
Oh my. This is too new to garner many responses yet; I'll check it later.
rockymountaindem (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-28-09 12:42 PM
Original message
According to MSNBC, Democrats have promised Specter not to field another Dem candidate in 2010
So instead of seeing him go down against Toomey, then beat Toomey with a real Democrat (which would be easy given what a hard rightwinger Toomey is), we're going to just accept Specter into our party indefinitely instead of being totally rid of him in 2 years?
It's not like he's going to suddenly start voting differently. This sounds like a big waste to me.
PRETZEL (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-28-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a back room deal, if Specter runs unapposed then wins in November, what's to stop him from switching back?
Arkana (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-28-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Specter wanted into the party and out of the horrible situation with the GOP he was in, and freedom to vote his conscience.
Maybe he might surprise us--not on everything, but he's pro-choice, pro-gay rights, pro-environment...sounds like more of a Democrat than Evan Bayh, and we keep him around.
He also gave us two great Supreme Court justices.
Shove that up your asses and smoke it, primitives.
L. Coyote (1000+ posts) Tue Apr-28-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. BS. It is a free country. Anyone can run in the primary! Kick his R arse out!
and put a progressive in that seat. This is NOT change!
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Tue Apr 28th 2009, 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
THE RELEASED
when mentally ill offenders
leave prison