The Conservative Cave

The Bar => The Lounge => Topic started by: Ralph Wiggum on April 21, 2009, 05:31:41 PM

Title: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on April 21, 2009, 05:31:41 PM: Quote
A judge in Stuttgart, Germany, is currently trying to decide on a lawsuit in which a man hired his neighbour to impregnate his wife.

It gets weirder.

Demetrius Soupolos, 29, and his former beauty queen wife, Traute, were very keen to have a child together, but Demetrius was sterile so they began to seek out other possible options.

The option the couple eventually decided on was to hire their neighbour Frank Maus, 34, to impregnate Traute.

Maus, who was already married with two children agreed to do the job for the fee of â‚¬2,000. For three evenings a week for the next six months, a total of 72 different times, Maus tried to impregnate Traute.

When his own wife objected, Maus explained that he was "only doing it for the money."

After the unsuccessful six-month period Soupolos insisted that Maus take a medical examination. The doctor concluded that Maus was also sterile, which forced his wife into admitting that their two children did not belong to him.

Getting paid to have sex with the neighbor. :bow:

LINK (http://cartooncat.newsvine.com/_news/2009/04/21/2712464-man-hires-impotent-neighbour-to-impregnate-his-wifethen-sues)
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: franksolich on April 21, 2009, 05:33:08 PM: Well, that appears to have opened up a whole can of worms.
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Lord Undies on April 21, 2009, 05:35:47 PM: 72 times? Maus should give the guy a blank check.
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Hawkgirl on April 21, 2009, 05:40:31 PM: So THAT's why his wife objected.... :lmao:
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on April 21, 2009, 05:46:02 PM: This gets even funnier, from the original story:

Quote
Maus' argument is that he did not guarantee conception, only that he would try his hardest.

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: JohnnyReb on April 21, 2009, 05:48:26 PM: Impotent and sterile are not..........you know, the same thing.

.....and the beauty queen wife got screwed..............a lot.
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Lord Undies on April 21, 2009, 05:50:57 PM: Quote from: Ralph Wiggum on April 21, 2009, 05:46:02 PM
This gets even funnier, from the original story:

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:

All he was doing was sowing the seeds of discontent.
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Hawkgirl on April 21, 2009, 06:24:31 PM: Well, he gave it his best shot.
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Flame on April 21, 2009, 06:27:14 PM: Quote from: Hawkgirl on April 21, 2009, 06:24:31 PM
Well, he gave it his best shot.

yeah, too bad he was shootin' blanks!
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: thundley4 on April 21, 2009, 06:36:05 PM: There sure wasn't much bang for the buck.
Or
In with a bang, out with a whimper?
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Lord Undies on April 21, 2009, 06:38:02 PM: Quote from: thundley4 on April 21, 2009, 06:36:05 PM
There sure wasn't much bang for the buck.
Or
In with a bang, out with a whimper?

What goes in hard and pink and comes out soft and wet?
Title: Re: Man hires impotent neighbour to impregnate his wife...then sues
Post by: Ralph Wiggum on April 21, 2009, 06:43:36 PM: Quote from: JohnnyReb on April 21, 2009, 05:48:26 PM
Impotent and sterile are not..........you know, the same thing.

Maybe it's some sort of British grammar misunderstanding. Perhaps Bijou could enlighten us....

...not with the sterility or impotence, but the grammar. :-)