The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: jinxmchue on February 28, 2009, 01:42:00 PM

Title: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: jinxmchue on February 28, 2009, 01:42:00 PM: It's factual, accurate and sourced. Unfortunately, it flies directly in the face of the hoard of liberals on Wikipedia that believe in this "Dominionism" garbage:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dominionism&diff=273947757&oldid=272643476

So, within a few minutes? Within the hour? A few hours? Tomorrow? Within a couple days? Within a week?
Title: Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: thundley4 on February 28, 2009, 02:11:03 PM: Looks like it was already undone.

(cur) (prev) 19:50, 28 February 2009 Mike Doughney (Talk | contribs) (38,640 bytes) (Undid revision 273947757 by 67.135.49.198 (talk) opinion pieces are not reliable sources) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 19:39, 28 February 2009 67.135.49.198 (Talk) (39,222 bytes) (undo)
Title: Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: Chris_ on February 28, 2009, 06:10:59 PM: It's probably the fister, he lives for Wiki.
Title: Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: franksolich on February 28, 2009, 08:49:38 PM: Quote from: Bondai on February 28, 2009, 06:10:59 PM
It's probably the fister, he lives for Wiki.

I wondered myself, but it's my impression Fat Che "gave up" on wikipedia a couple of years ago.

Or so Fat Che alleged he did.
Title: Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: jinxmchue on February 28, 2009, 11:27:04 PM: Quote from: thundley4 on February 28, 2009, 02:11:03 PM
Looks like it was already undone.

(cur) (prev) 19:50, 28 February 2009 Mike Doughney (Talk | contribs) (38,640 bytes) (Undid revision 273947757 by 67.135.49.198 (talk) opinion pieces are not reliable sources) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 19:39, 28 February 2009 67.135.49.198 (Talk) (39,222 bytes) (undo)

HA! Nice excuse, too. Never mind that the rest of the article is filled with "opinion pieces."

Oh, and this is hilariously priceless: one of the sources I cited IS USED LATER ON IN THE ARTICLE!
Title: Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: AllosaursRus on March 01, 2009, 12:05:04 AM: Quote from: franksolich on February 28, 2009, 08:49:38 PM
I wondered myself, but it's my impression Fat Che "gave up" on wikipedia a couple of years ago.

Or so Fat Che alleged he did.

Hey Coach, what exactly is this about? It would help if someone would explain this shit!
Title: Re: Taking bets on how quickly this Wikipedia edit will be removed
Post by: franksolich on March 01, 2009, 05:49:42 PM: Quote from: AllosaursRus on March 01, 2009, 12:05:04 AM
Hey Coach, what exactly is this about? It would help if someone would explain this shit!

For at least a couple of years, maybe longer, Fat Che, the now-exiled "Ben Burch" primitive from Skins's island, dominated discussions in vast sections of wikipedia, also allegedly using sockpuppets.

Fat Che is no Abraham Lincoln when it comes to being honest.

wikipedia entries are determined by "the collective" arguing with each other; never mind if one doesn't know excresence about what he's talking about.

Fat Che's big crusades over there were to (a) get freerepublic out of it, (b) keep Fat Che (as an individual) in it, (c) keep Fat Che's "White Rose" Society in it, and (d) keep W. Andrew Stephenson (as an individual) in it.

Ultimately, Fat Che failed in (a), (b), (c), and (d), but it took a long time.

Fat Che meddled in a lot of things over there; one sort of got the impression he was the owner of wikipedia. He wasn't very popular, as rectal apertures rarely are.