The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on February 20, 2009, 07:47:47 AM

Title: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: franksolich on February 20, 2009, 07:47:47 AM
While I'm on a few days' sabbatical from Skins's island, busy doing income taxes, I've been thinking a great deal about how my own attitude towards the primitives of Skins's island has evolved--since I first discovered Skins's island several years ago, during the 2002 and 2004 political campaigns, during Doug's ex-wife's Great Mischief and the Bostonian Drunkard's Fitzmas, and during the 2006 and 2008 political campaigns.

I've concluded that, yeah, my own attitude about the primitives has been slowly evolving, gradually taking a turn for the worse.....and it bothers me not at all.

The evolution was that, initially, I was puzzled by the primitives, and took all of their negativity and self-pity as a temporary aberration that would straighten itself out over time.  Then puzzlement gave away to anger that such ungrateful jerks and rectal apertures existed in America, among my own people.

And then during Doug's ex-wife's Great Mischief and the Bostonian Drunkard's premature ejaculation over the nonIndictment of Karl Rove, I spun around to the perception--a correct perception, by the way--that "Man, these primitives are really stupid, just really stupid; how do they manage to breathe without an instruction book?"

During the past two elections, the evolution has been towards the attitude that the primitives need to be slapped around, and vigorously so.  Applying the lash might civilize six or half a dozen primitives, might half-civilize a few more primitives so that they stay in line, and as for the rest, well, they need the lash simply because they're such ugly, nasty, brutish, bestial, bloodthirsty, savage primitives.

It won't do any good, but the last-mentioned primitives need the lash anyway, and more so than the first two groups of primitives.

I'm a nice guy, one of the nicest guys one can hope to meet, in real life, renown far and wide for my courtesy and graciousness, my indulgence and tolerance, my live-and-let-live, my kind and forgiving nature.

In fact, there are some in real life who insist such traits in me are not a virtue, but actually a character flaw, due to the excess of it--but as I haven't yet been damaged or bankrupted, I let it go, deaf to such allegations.

So this is why I've been thinking about it, how I feel about the primitives.  Usually in real life, my perception of other people goes upward as time passes--familiarity breeds respect, in this case--and so in theory this should be a bad thing, thinking worse and worse and worse of the primitives.

But on the other hand, this doesn't bother me.
Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: Carl on February 20, 2009, 07:56:02 AM
I don`t want to walk down the same road of insane hatred that they exhibit towards everyone,that leaves a bitter empty husk of humanity in a person.

Lately though watching how hopelessly useless they are with a growing sense that O being president is somehow winning a lottery I think it is best that they are not given much latitude in things.
They can not responsibly handle any aspect of life and will abuse all they are given.

Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: franksolich on February 20, 2009, 07:57:28 AM
They can not responsibly handle any aspect of life and will abuse all they are given.

That's why they need the lash.
Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on February 20, 2009, 08:02:38 AM
Yes

Killing them outright would be more merciful for all involved.
Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: Traveshamockery on February 20, 2009, 08:50:35 AM
They have a major pack mentality going on at the dump.  They are what psychiatrists would refer to as "toxic" personalities and that toxicity spreads like wildfire there.  They are angry and displace that anger towards these people they call republicans because that gives them someone to blame other than themselves for their failure to make responsible life choices. 

In simple terms - they are losers and they want everyone else to be losers with them.  The only problem is they are not intelligent enough to figure out that it's the responsible people in this country who pay for the losers. 

What is really sad is that these losers have children and they are raising these children to be just like them. 


 :loser:

Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: USA4ME on February 20, 2009, 09:09:08 AM
The anger and the lies they're willing to tell themselves have been amped up lately.

.
Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 20, 2009, 10:20:23 AM
I think that the author of this article sums it up rather nicely.  Pay attention to the last paragraph.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/4624008/Sorry-America-Im-the-bearer-of-bad-news.html

For those who can't go there, it reads like this:

Quote
America is as divided as it has been in perhaps any era since the Civil War. It's going to get uglier yet.

I'm afraid that James Delingpole is right.

Title: Re: Poll: are we being less than gracious towards the primitives?
Post by: dutch508 on February 20, 2009, 10:38:35 AM
I haven't killed any of them yet, so I don't see what they are bitching about.