The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Carl on January 31, 2009, 02:05:13 PM

Title: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: Carl on January 31, 2009, 02:05:13 PM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4951527

Quote
Cyrano  (1000+ posts)          Sat Jan-31-09 02:22 PM
Original message
Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
   Advertisements [?]

Josef Goebbels, Hitler's propagandist, probably never killed anyone with his own hands. But had he not committed suicide, he would have been tried at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity. His hands were soaked in as much blood as those who did the actual killing.

We all know that Rush Limbaugh claimed to have a boil on his butt which kept him out of Vietnam. So, (as far as we know), he's never killed anyone with his own hands.

Nonetheless, his hands are drenched in blood. His crimes go beyond aiding and abetting our homegrown war criminals. His lies, propaganda, and well-packaged hatred helped make mass murder possible -- and even acceptable, to many Americans.

Hopefully, someday in the not-too-distant future, we'll see Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld, and their fellow murderers standing before the bar of justice.

So I hope you are not sleeping too well at night, Rush. You just might be standing there with them.

I know,I know more mental masturbation from a loon but still a pretty good idea as to what the left would do if given a chance.

Quote
backscatter712  (1000+ posts)        Sat Jan-31-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. We should do to him what was done to Julius Streicher.
   Edited on Sat Jan-31-09 02:33 PM by backscatter712
He didn't directly kill with his own hands either. But we hanged the son-of-a-bitch, for promoting antisemitic hatred in Der Stürmer. He was found guilty of crimes against humanity at Nuremburg. Good ****ing riddance to him.

If promoting antisemitic hatred has that for a consequence I would think it would be you at the DUmp who should be worried.

Quote
Cyrano  (1000+ posts)          Sat Jan-31-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He does have the right to spew hateful filth
   But along with rights go responsibility.

Over 4,000 Americans and unknown hundreds of thousands of Iraqis are dead because of the lies of Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld et al.

Does Rush bear any responsibility for being on the front lines of selling the lies they used to implement their war crimes?

My guess is that virtually any district attorney in the country would (if they could) go after him as a member of a critical, deadly criminal conspiracy.

.....and you would be wrong.

Quote
Maccagirl (1000+ posts)        Sat Jan-31-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree that Limbutt only has the influence that his idiot
   enablers allow him, but there has to be SOME accountability somewhere.

Quote
stuntcat  (1000+ posts)          Sat Jan-31-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. far as I'm concerned
   murder-enabler.

The continuance of redefining crime as anything a leftist disagrees with.
Scary thinking and it sure doesn`t come from our side.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on January 31, 2009, 02:13:55 PM
I'm wondering what would happen if someone suggested have Rush prosecuted under RICO/voting rights laws. How quickly would the DUmmies fall in line?

"Because of Rush's opposition to Obama he endangers the voting rights of millions of Americans who voted for Obama and want to see him succeed. That is a voting rights violation and as his is an organized effort to intimidate/extort members of the GOP and dems in conservative districts it is tantamount to extortion as perpetrated by an organized criminal mob."
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: The Village Idiot on January 31, 2009, 02:30:20 PM
Very fast and happily.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: TheSarge on January 31, 2009, 02:49:02 PM
The DUmmies fail to realize that for the same reasons they want The StateTM to toss someone like Rush in jail...they too would be incarcertated along side Rush by The StateTM.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: Traveshamockery on January 31, 2009, 02:56:36 PM
Quote
Maccagirl (1000+ posts)        Sat Jan-31-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. I agree that Limbutt only has the influence that his idiot
   enablers allow him, but there has to be SOME accountability somewhere.


This comment comes from the same group of people who hang on every word spewed by Rachel Maddow, Keith Olbermann, and NanceGreggs. 

 :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: Peter3_1 on January 31, 2009, 03:26:43 PM
I wonder what these idiots would say if some jerk filed murder  and genocide charges against all the remaing living Congresspeople who forced of out of SEA. An act that resulted in at LEAST 2,000,000  people dying in Cambodia, S. Vietnam etc etc? Any bets they'd suddenly have a major attack of "Cognitive Dissonance" and make ENDLESS adhominum attack. Seems to me that's what they are best at.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: MrsSmith on January 31, 2009, 03:38:02 PM
I wonder if they see the blood of millions of innocent babies on their own hands?
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: USA4ME on January 31, 2009, 04:13:19 PM
Quote from:
Cyrano

......

But what I find frightening is how close we came to becoming an absolute dictatorship. It's hard to count the number of Americans who finally dared to exhale and breathe again at noontime on January 20th of this year when Obama was sworn in.

Let me state this plainly: The Bush administration in no way committed the crimes that were committed by Nazi Germany. But can anyone really deny that BushCo was headed down the same path taken by the Nazis?

.....

 :mental:

.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 31, 2009, 04:30:02 PM
I wonder if they see the blood of millions of innocent babies on their own hands?

No, they don't.  H5 for the point.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: crockspot on February 01, 2009, 09:35:27 AM
These idiots goose step just a little higher and harder every day.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 01, 2009, 11:21:07 AM
:mental:

.


That's putting it mildly.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: CC27 on February 01, 2009, 12:01:50 PM
DUmmies and the Dems have boat people blood on there hands.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: jukin on February 01, 2009, 02:46:13 PM
U-S-E-F-U-L-   I-D-I-O-T-S
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: Chris_ on February 01, 2009, 05:14:10 PM
U-S-E-F-U-L-   I-D-I-O-T-S


Yep, delusional too.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: franksolich on February 01, 2009, 05:22:52 PM
Yep, delusional too.

You know, sir, I'm about as far from being a Stalinist as one can get, but at times, Oscar Wilde, the large-proboscised primitive, the "Cyrano" primitive, makes me feel very Stalinist, most especially when it comes to redistribution of populations.

Oscar Wilde, orginally from New York, moved down to Florida, and ever since he's been in Florida, all he's done is bitch and whine and moan and malign Florida and Floridians.

If he doesn't like it, what the Hell is Oscar doing down in Florida?

Now, I've never been to Florida, but I'm sure that it's a perfectly nice state, full of all sorts of nice people.....the problem being, all these outsiders moving down there, ruining it.

And so Oscar Wilde, when I see him, makes me feel Stalinist; makes me think it would be a good idea for Florida (and Vermont) to expel all those who moved there after, say, 1970, as they're polluting the natural "ecology"--in the sociological sense--of it.

I hate it when I feel this way, but it's Oscar Wilde's fault.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: Lord Undies on February 01, 2009, 08:43:16 PM
The whole thing about this "blood on hands" crap is that no one can change history and get away with it.  There is webpage after webpage, video after video, congressional records after congressional records, which prove that the policy of the USA and all the Powers That Be was to destroy Saddam Hussein and his jackboot government long before the election of George W. Bush to be President of the United States.

Try as the loony liberals might, they cannot run away from the responsibility (and the praise) for the outcome of the US policy concerning Iraq.  In truth, they OWN it.

President George W. Bush just happened to be in the hot seat at the time blustering had to stop and action had to begin.  It seems as if no one remembers all the terrorist training camps found inside Saddam Hussein's Iraq. 

Ah, but they were there and history cannot be changed.  Blood on Limbaugh's hands indeed!   
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: MrsSmith on February 01, 2009, 10:16:29 PM
The whole thing about this "blood on hands" crap is that no one can change history and get away with it.  There is webpage after webpage, video after video, congressional records after congressional records, which prove that the policy of the USA and all the Powers That Be was to destroy Saddam Hussein and his jackboot government long before the election of George W. Bush to be President of the United States.

Try as the loony liberals might, they cannot run away from the responsibility (and the praise) for the outcome of the US policy concerning Iraq.  In truth, they OWN it.

President George W. Bush just happened to be in the hot seat at the time blustering had to stop and action had to begin.  It seems as if no one remembers all the terrorist training camps found inside Saddam Hussein's Iraq. 

Ah, but they were there and history cannot be changed.  Blood on Limbaugh's hands indeed!   
History cannot be changed, but they can sure lie about it...
48 Liberal Lies About American History: (That You Probably Learned in School)  (http://www.amazon.com/Liberal-Lies-About-American-History/dp/1595230513/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1233548096&sr=8-1[/url)

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51J7GBOK6dL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01_.jpg)




If they lie long enough and hard enough, our kids and grandkids won't KNOW the true history.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on February 01, 2009, 10:19:34 PM
Quote
Hopefully, someday in the not-too-distant future, we'll see Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld, and their fellow murderers standing before the bar of justice.

Just keep holding your breath for that one, Cyrano you frickin' moron.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: docstew on February 02, 2009, 07:26:04 AM
I wonder if they see the blood of millions of innocent babies on their own hands?

H5
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 02, 2009, 07:47:35 AM
Just keep holding your breath for that one, Cyrano you frickin' moron.

Someone should help him hold his breath by duct-taping his nose and mouth shut.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: JohnnyReb on February 02, 2009, 08:43:28 AM
DU - Communism, Socialism, Facism and Nazi, all rolled into one.

Now that you've rolled your own.....how you gonna light that thing?
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 02, 2009, 08:54:26 AM
I suggest napalm.

Or, a high-intensity flash--like one generated by a nuke.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: BlueStateSaint on February 02, 2009, 09:37:19 AM
I think they have one of those coming, courtesy of a terrorist attack on a very blue city, with no retaliation feared from the bamster.

I fully expect NYC to "attract attention."  I'm staying the **** away from there, at least for the next four years.
Title: Re: Does Rush Limbaugh have blood on his hands?
Post by: delilahmused on February 02, 2009, 12:58:04 PM
Well, I see Rush is the new Snowball. I'm starting to think George Orwell, wasn't just a mere author but a prophet.

Cindie