The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on January 25, 2009, 08:37:53 PM

Title: why is something, or rather, why are some things, missing?
Post by: franksolich on January 25, 2009, 08:37:53 PM

I went to wikipedia to look up some things.

Much to my surprise, Fat Che doesn't appear to be mentioned there any more, nor does his "White Rose Society."

I even got so desperate as to look for the biography of a late red round one, and that's not there.

All this stuff used to be on wikipedia.

Title: Re: why is something, or rather, why are some things, missing?
Post by: miskie on January 25, 2009, 09:41:49 PM

Ive taken a look, and found the discussions for the deletion of these entities, circa 2006, 2007 for the website.

late red round one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andy_Stephenson)
Fat Che (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ben_Burch_(3rd_nomination))
White Rose Society (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_White_Rose_Society_(website)_(3rd_nomination))

Title: Re: why is something, or rather, why are some things, missing?
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 26, 2009, 07:08:19 AM

I read the comments to all 3 articles.

"The person is non-notable".....you know that has to hurt a liberals ego.... :rotf:

It hurts when even your fellow liberals tell you....you don't amount to $#!^.... :rotf:

Title: Re: why is something, or rather, why are some things, missing?
Post by: franksolich on January 26, 2009, 07:12:28 AM

Quote from: miskie on January 25, 2009, 09:41:49 PM

Ive taken a look, and found the discussions for the deletion of these entities, circa 2006, 2007 for the website.

late red round one (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Andy_Stephenson)
Fat Che (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ben_Burch_(3rd_nomination))
White Rose Society (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_White_Rose_Society_(website)_(3rd_nomination))

Thank you, sir: I went to each of the three links.

I was sort of outdated on Fat Che, who won't let me register at the Rancid Rhodes message board despite that I'm aboveboard about it; the last I had heard, Fat Che was leaving wikipedia, but then reconsidered.  Apparently he did leave.

Fat Che made it sound like his leaving would be a detriment to wikipedia.

Yeah, sure.

With the subtraction of these three articles, wikipedia added to its credibility.

I always suspected Fat Che had sockpuppet-written the now-gone entries about himself and his stupid web-site; blatant self-promotion.

I think I'll visit wikipedia more often, now that Fat Che isn't pompously waddling around, looking very much like a grossly obese rooster preening its inadequate feathers.  Fat Che always tried giving the impression he owned the place. 

Title: Re: why is something, or rather, why are some things, missing?
Post by: Rebel on January 26, 2009, 07:26:18 AM

RE: Andy Stephenson:

Quote

# *STRONG KEEP* Andy is clearly notable as any thinking person would know. Attempts to delete this fine man are evidence of the hand of Rove at work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.159.148.121 (talk • contribs)

 :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: