The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: LC EFA on January 10, 2009, 07:40:31 PM
-
Clearly a newbie...
chaz4jazz (296 posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat Jan-10-09 06:59 PM
Original message
Hypocrisy 101 - how the world views the Jews
Hypocrisy 101: Yesterday, a female suicide bomber killed upwards of forty-five Muslim women pilgrims at a shrine in Iraq. More hundreds died all over Africa from starvation and brutality in Zimbabwe, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Darfur, Somalia and more. Taliban zealots routinely murder female children for having the audacity to go to school and adult women for not dressing sufficiently modestly. I look in vain for demonstrations in any part of the world against these ongoing and horrific human rights violations.
From 2005 to 2008, Hamas regularly bombarded Israel with rockets aimed in the general direction of populated areas. Somehow, I seem to have missed the outrage and frustration the world must have shown at these criminal acts. Or, heaven forefend, is there a double standard? Does it matter who is on which end of the weapon that makes the difference?
No one seems to get excited when Muslims are holding the guns but go ballistic when it is a Jew. Jews with guns; not something the world is yet accustomed to. After all, for almost two millennia, it was open season on Jews anywhere in the world. Beginning in 1948, however, for the first time since the year 70 CE, there was and continues to be, a Jewish Army which has no qualms about defending its people. That is only as it should be.
Imagine, if you will, a breakdown in governmental authority in Mexico. Imagine further a breakaway rebel group that refuses to answer to the central authorities in Mexico City and lobs rockets into Arizona. How might the U.S. respond? Very angrily, exactly as we did in 1912 when Pancho Villa attacked Columbus, New Mexico and we sent an army into Mexico after him.
No cries for proportionality then, were they? We sent an army after a guerilla band. Now, we are told that Israel is reacting disproportionally by using airplanes and armor against guerillas and rockets. Grow up people, this is not a sporting match where one tries to match weights and create a level playing field. It is a war where one uses every tool at hand to do the job. Insisting on proportionality is to give the weaker party the choice of weapons and to define the size of the force. How more stupid could a doctrine be? If you must go to war – not a first choice – then you do so to win, not to play games for the soothing of world opinion, a notorious whore, for sale to the highest bidder.
To quote the late Golda Meir: "this war will end when they love their children more than they hate us."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4804653
Chisel Chisel...
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Jan-10-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is not a useful post.
Furthermore, The Mexico-U.S. analogy is deeply flawed. The U.S. has not been occupying Mexico for the last 40 years.
Israel is acting disproportionately.
Oh, and that Meir quote? It's like saying that the Palestinians aren't normal people who love their children. And that's bullshit.
Proportionate responses lead to eternal war... Is that really what you want to advocate.
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Jan-10-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Israelis are in far more danger from their cars than from rockets
15 people killed by rockets in 8 years is chickenshit compared to 461 road accident deaths a year. And 15 dead are no excuse for mass murder and ethnic cleansing.
Never mind the death from above, worry about the traffic on the way to work... Bury the head in the sand.
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Jan-10-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Israel will bomb itself into destruction. Their attacks are making Hamas more popular now.
They may be more popular in some quarters, but dead terrorists don't fire rockets.
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Jan-10-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Complete and total horseshit. Nice try though...
:eyes:
I think it's the Jews armed with tanks and supersonic warplanes versus people with rockets and stones that tends to get people fired up...
But go ahead and defend the tactics used by the right-wing in this country to justify the illegal war in Iraq.
You want to talk about hypocrisy? Support the jews attacking hamas in order to "defend themselves" but at the same time villify the bush junta for using the very same logic to invade Iraq...
Brilliant.
:eyes:
It's all the Jooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooozzzzzzzz !!!!
pinto DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sat Jan-10-09 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Locking.
Inflammatory rhetoric.
*snicker*
-
Well, the Jews-hating 0bamaite cali primitive didn't disappoint.
-
if the israelis had been smarter, they would have hit gaza before the election; that would have forced obama to all but support their move, or run the risk of losing the jewish vote (which inexplicably went for him by about 65%, IIRC.)
-
Man... I'd love to just dump those people outta the back of a C-5 at 36,000 feet. Without a parachute.
-
Somehow I can`t get past the feeling that the visceral hatred the primitives have for Israel and Jews is simply a matter of it being part of the Bible.
-
Somehow I can`t get past the feeling that the visceral hatred the primitives have for Israel and Jews is simply a matter of it being part of the Bible.
the palestinians are poor, homeless, victims of their own bad decisions, and are generally an unmanageable mob. in other words, they are literally poster children for the liberal impulse.
and I agree with you that the jews' theological significance certainly isn't helping matters when it comes to libs.
-
Man... I'd love to just dump those people outta the back of a C-5 at 36,000 feet. Without a parachute.
The EPA would skin you alive for that.
-
The EPA would skin you alive for that.
:rofl: air pollution. H5. :-)
-
Somehow I can`t get past the feeling that the visceral hatred the primitives have for Israel and Jews is simply a matter of it being part of the Bible.
You know, from reading old magazines and history books, there's something very strange.
Few remember that at one time, Israel and the Jews were the Great Liberal Cause.
Conservatives didn't seem to have a position; it just wasn't any issue or culture that got them all agog and excited.
Israel and the Jews however were the Great Liberal Cause, from 1945 on; as late as the Six-Day War of 1967, which Israel won but at a great cost, it was the academicians, the "artists," the "intelligentsia," the Democrats, the liberals here in America who immediately purchased, and boosted the sale of, Israeli bonds meant to pay for the war.
The "turning point" seems to be pinpointed down to December 1974; I have no idea what happened (this was AFTER the War of 1973), and it turned quickly, instantly. I think I noticed it in the Nation magazine, which had published a whole lot of articles favorable to Israel and the Jews earlier in the year, and did an abrupt turnabout, an abrupt volte-face, in December 1974.
Ditto Walter Cronkite, apparently, the same month and the same year.
It was so startling that for years I've accused Democrats, liberals, and primitives of having a special telephone line to the Nation magazine that rings occasionally, and when one picks it up, one is told what to think.
Coincidence?
-
I think that's pretty accurate, Frank. they were the great liberal cause until, through their own hard work and perseverance, they succeeded. then they were a national example of the fact that the liberal ideal simply doesn't work. thus, the current liberal hostility.
-
Israelis Terrorized by Seven Years of Life Under Fire
Hamas rockets wreak havoc on southern Israel.
Hamas rockets slammed into a kindergarten in Beersheba Wednesday in the latest spate of indiscriminate rocket fire on Israeli civilians in southern Israel, the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz reported. For the past seven years, southern Israeli communities have seen more than 6,300 rocket and mortar attacks. Each rocket launch sets off a warning system—a woman’s voice calling "Tzeva Adom" or "Red Alert"—which allows residents just 15 seconds to take cover. In the city of Sderot, nearly three-quarters of children exhibit signs of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and the town's bus stops have all been converted to reinforced bomb shelters. Children have grown up under the constant threat of Hamas rockets—kids play soccer games on smaller fields so they have enough time to run for cover in case of an attack, and families sleep in small bunkers, knowing that 15 seconds is not enough time to rouse everyone.
If the Palestinians don't like retribution, they should dump the cowardly terrorists in their midst (http://www.aipac.org/index_131.asp?view=print)
Israel Steps Up Transfer of Aid, Medicine to Gaza
Israel continues to facilitate the transfer of aid to Gaza residents.
For the second day, Israel halted military operations for three hours to enable food and medicine to flow to Palestinians through a secure humanitarian corridor, The Jerusalem Post reported. Israel has been facilitating the transfer of significant amounts of humanitarian supplies—some of which has been stolen from civilians by Hamas terrorists for their own use—during the course of its operation in the Gaza Strip, delivering 15,000 tons of aid over the past week and a half. The humanitarian effort allowed half-a-million liters of heavy duty diesel to pass through the Nahal Oz terminal, despite terror threats on the facility, and 90,000 liters of fuel will be transferred for the first time by truck via the Kerem Shalom crossing. On Wednesday, 76 trucks filled with humanitarian aid entered Gaza, with more shipments expected to arrive Thursday. Israel also coordinated the movement of 14 ambulances to evacuate wounded civilians, enabled access for doctors and nurses to Gaza and took steps to repair power lines and resume power supplies to Gaza City. Click here to learn about Israel's efforts to transfer aid to Gaza.
There are none so blind as though who refuse to see.
-
Somehow I can`t get past the feeling that the visceral hatred the primitives have for Israel and Jews is simply a matter of it being part of the Bible.
That and the fact that they are fairly strong allies with the U.S. government. Since the U.S. government is the most evil entity in the history of the world (until Jan. 20, of course, when it will become the greatest force for good in history), it stands to reason that Israel is also evil. You might say that U.S./Israel is the moonbat Axis Of Evil.
-
I will never, EVER forget, or forgive, the palestinians cheering on 9/11. ever.
-
And as always, now that the election is over, and the Democrat electorate has no need for the Jews, under the bus they go.
-
And as always, now that the election is over, and the Democrat electorate has no need for the Jews, under the bus they go.
the obama bus has about a million people under it by now.
-
the obama bus has about a million people under it by now.
5 million more, and Duh Fuhrer will have caught up to the last Fuhrer.
-
The bus is quipped with blood-grip tires.......it had blood and snow tires but the shit got to slick.
-
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/mamacags/spravedlivayavoinayj2.jpg)
-
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c64/mamacags/spravedlivayavoinayj2.jpg)
That pretty much says it all right there.
-
the obama bus has about a million people under it by now.
300 million, actually.
-
the obama bus has about a million people under it by now.
Five million more and he'll match hitler.
20 or so more, and he's in line with stalin.
-
Five million more and he'll match hitler.
20 or so more, and he's in line with stalin.
Dutch, the fear is that he won't settle for being second or third . . . Remember what Ayres said, about having to "liquidate" 25 million people?
-
You know, from reading old magazines and history books, there's something very strange.
Few remember that at one time, Israel and the Jews were the Great Liberal Cause.
Conservatives didn't seem to have a position; it just wasn't any issue or culture that got them all agog and excited.
Israel and the Jews however were the Great Liberal Cause, from 1945 on; as late as the Six-Day War of 1967, which Israel won but at a great cost, it was the academicians, the "artists," the "intelligentsia," the Democrats, the liberals here in America who immediately purchased, and boosted the sale of, Israeli bonds meant to pay for the war.
The "turning point" seems to be pinpointed down to December 1974; I have no idea what happened (this was AFTER the War of 1973), and it turned quickly, instantly. I think I noticed it in the Nation magazine, which had published a whole lot of articles favorable to Israel and the Jews earlier in the year, and did an abrupt turnabout, an abrupt volte-face, in December 1974.
Ditto Walter Cronkite, apparently, the same month and the same year.
It was so startling that for years I've accused Democrats, liberals, and primitives of having a special telephone line to the Nation magazine that rings occasionally, and when one picks it up, one is told what to think.
Coincidence?
Interesting, of course the December edition would have been going final immediately on the heels of the war, or even while it was still underway, due to the necessary time overhead to publish the rag. Israel successfully defended itself militarily at great cost in the Yom Kippur/Ramadan War, but also at an even greater cost politically to include bringing the US and USSR to an unprecedented worldwide alert and the brink of war themselves, so in Weltpolitik it was not a victory for them and perhaps fear of provoking that worldwide conflict soured their stock with the Libs.
Israeli failure to stop at successive agreed cease-fire lines after the counterattack across the canal, and then dissemble about it diplomatically, lead to the Soviets alerting their airborne forces for immediate deployment to enforce the lines, and the US had nothing remotely like the amount of rapidly-deployable forces it would have taken to counter STAVKA's airborne reserves (about 8 regular divisions at the time), putting us right into either going nuclear, shutting up, or reining in the Israelis hard.
It's unfortunate but true that despite what would seem to be their own best interests, the American Jewish vote is very heavily a Democrat and Liberal constituency. I remember trying to point this out on either TOS or a gun board at one time a couple of years ago to some dolt who just couldn't believe it, and insisted I was dead wrong.
-
As I have said before, You go against Gods people at your own peril. The libs are more and more acting like lemmings and they don't care who they will be taking down with them.
-
As I have said before, You go againstGods people at your own peril. The libs are more and more acting like lemmings and they don't care who they will be taking down with them.
As all of Satan's minions want, they want lots of company in Hell.
-
chaz4jazz
No cries for proportionality then, were they? ...... Grow up people, this is not a sporting match where one tries to match weights and create a level playing field. It is a war where one uses every tool at hand to do the job. Insisting on proportionality is to give the weaker party the choice of weapons and to define the size of the force. How more stupid could a doctrine be? If you must go to war – not a first choice – then you do so to win,...
My first experince with libs on-line was after 911 at the San Francisco Indymedia board. Yeah, I went straight for the real whack-jobs, no pusssy-footing around.
Of course, they're all anti-Israel (anti-Jew) as are many libs. But what is mentioned above I distinctly remember as being discussed, which simply blew me away, I didn't realize people could be that stupid. They were always crying about Israel not waging a "fair fight" because they had more and better weapons.
To them, I would make note that, in history, typically a King who had an army of 10,000 would weigh the cost of going to battle with a King who had an army of 20,000 before engaging him, and if he saw he couldn't win, he would send an ambassador to try and make peace, and that the palestinians should try and do the same. The typical argument back would be "Why should they negotiate with people who stole their land from them? They're fighting to get it back," to which I would ask them why they're upset then, because obviously the palestinians are willing to die to get back their land, and so they're getting their wish. Oh boy, the sparks and accusations would fly. But when you're dealing with nuts, might as well goof with them and see how far off the handle they'd fly.
Oh, and if you would tell them that they were living on stolen land from the Native Americans, and should they attack them would they up and leave their land, a few would say they would, but most would say it was an unfair comparison, they you can't go back in time and change everything that was done wrong, but this event was recent enough (1948) that one could. I even had a few try and tell me that the Indians never occupied what is now the SF Bay Area because it was too windy and wasn't good hunting grounds, so SF was actually occupying land the Indians never claimed. :mental:
But yeah, the cali primitive is a major, big-time Jew hater.
.
-
Bush wanted to have government funding go to the much lamented Faith Based Initiatives, the liberals were up in arms screeching about THEOCRACY, as if it were the worst possible thing EVER. Terrorists like Hamas and the PA, Hezbolla, al Qaeda ALL want ISLAMIC THEOCRACY, liberals are silent.
-
Bush wanted to have government funding go to the much lamented Faith Based Initiatives, the liberals were up in arms screeching about THEOCRACY, as if it were the worst possible thing EVER. Terrorists like Hamas and the PA, Hezbolla, al Qaeda ALL want ISLAMIC THEOCRACY, liberals are silent.
Welcome to Bizarro World, aka the Liberal Brain.
-
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y223/dummiedestroyer/nytimesspoof.gif)
-
Five million more and he'll match hitler.
20 or so more, and he's in line with stalin.
He offed a lot of folks besides the Jews, actually, I think between the camps and eugenics programs it's believed to be around 10 million, not even counting close to 20 million or so dead Russkiis in the war, military and civilian. Stalin still has him beat by a wide margin both on the grand total and the dead Russkii count, of course.
-
He offed a lot of folks besides the Jews, actually, I think between the camps and eugenics programs it's believed to be around 10 million, not even counting close to 20 million or so dead Russkiis in the war, military and civilian. Stalin still has him beat by a wide margin both on the grand total and the dead Russkii count, of course.
And of course, he and Uncle Josef are amateurs if we ever throw Chairman Mao's numbers into the mix. Both of them together couldn't add up to the probable wholesale butchery (of course there's no objective verification of the numbers as there was in the case of Hitler, so the world may never know what the true, horrific butcher's bill was) of Chinese Communism.
-
And of course, he and Uncle Josef are amateurs if we ever throw Chairman Mao's numbers into the mix. Both of them together couldn't add up to the probable wholesale butchery (of course there's no objective verification of the numbers as there was in the case of Hitler, so the world may never know what the true, horrific butcher's bill was) of Chinese Communism.
Yeah, the 'Great Leap Forward' and 'Cultural Revolution' were pretty much a 'Great Leap into a Bloodbath Hell on Earth,' but the real numbers will no doubt remain forever cloaked in face-saving Chinese indirection.