The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: franksolich on January 07, 2009, 05:07:40 AM

Title: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: franksolich on January 07, 2009, 05:07:40 AM
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4780050

Once a month, it happens.

The lonestarnut primitive doesn't need a calendar.

One wonders if she gets hot flashes too.

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 08:56 PM
Original message
 
So Blair House lie! Get my ****ing shoes!

I hate you bushitler!

Quote
Botany  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
 
1. He is a petty little man

Lying up to the very end.

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
 
3. Lying liars and lies that lie.

Quote
rzemanfl  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
 
2. What a miserable, low-life, jug earred, lying ****wad, asshat turd the Supreme Court stuck us with.

I hope to live to piss on his grave.

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
 
4. I knew the mother****ers were at it again.

Quote
Idealist Hippie  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
 
14. I wish you good health, long life, capacious bladder, good aim.

Quote
grasswire  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
 
5. do you mind providing more detail????!!!!

GEEZ!

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
 
7.  Blair House with 113 rooms and umteenandtwenty bathrooms is empty.

In fact a "prior" foreign dignitary was invited by bushitler to make it look like the house was booked.

Ha ha.

Quote
MPK  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jan-06-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
 
6. I love haiku, too... 

Is there more to this?

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
 
8. Yes. Current use Blair House and was also on KO.

Despite this fact, Keith Olbermann, on his January 6, 2009, episode of Countdown intimated that the Bushes had denied the Obamas any use of the Blair House adding to the growing body of evidence that Mr. Olbermann is, ultimately, a big blowhard whose ratings are dwindling.

Quote
MPK  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jan-06-09 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
 
10. this is what I'm seeing--if I'm following along correctly: 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blair_House#Present_use

President-Elect Barack Obama and his family asked to use Blair House from January 04, 2009 until the inauguration ceremony planned for January 20, 2009 so their daughters could attend school when it resumed in January.<4> However, the Washington Post reported they were rebuffed by the Bushes, who said the building was already booked "by White House officials, the State Department and its Office of Protocol for various events."<5> Instead, the Obama family moved into the nearby Hay–Adams Hotel, until January 15 when they will move to Blair House as is the custom for all incoming presidents. January 15th to the 20th is always reserved for the incoming First Family. The Chief of Protocol of the United States is responsible for the operation of Blair House.

Nothing about KO. Unless that's on his page.

Ha ha.

And then a big big Fat Che pops up in the punchbowl:

Quote
crimsonblue  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jan-06-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
 
21. this coming from somebody that peddled a worthless rumor in October?

It is well known that Bush denied the Obama family use of Blair house; this was reported in December. Maybe you should get some real facts for once, instead of blasting your worthless drivel.

But the turd in the lonestarnut primitive's punchbowl gets ignored.

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
 
9. Not to mention, what it's costing us and the fact Obama has to move twice with everything else on his plate.

Anybody want to check and count how many times the lonestarnut primitive expressed concern about George Bush having too much on his plate?

Quote
MPK  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jan-06-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
 
15. That is disgusting.   

I actually thought this was going to turn out to be the situation. Bushes are mean-eyed and lower than whale shit.

Quote
dflprincess  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jan-06-09 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
 
17. I wonder what the Secret Service thinks of this

I would think Blair House would be a more secure location. Perhaps we can add threatening the life of the PE to Bush's crimes.

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
 
19. Makes one wonder.

Quote
alyce douglas  (1000+ posts)     Tue Jan-06-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
 
22. I hope this man burns in hell.

he is a spiteful disgusting man.

Quote
lonestarnot  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
 
23. I'm sure the first dump of a child killer was in on it too that stepford wife freak.

Quote
mod mom  (1000+ posts)        Tue Jan-06-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
 
24. after living the rest of his days in a cold dark prison cell.

Quote
dweller  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
 
26. and the rest of all time eternity under one...

Anybody happen to know if the lonestarnut primitive's spent time in psychiatric wards?
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: whiffleball on January 07, 2009, 05:32:50 AM
As long as she's posting, "I hate Bush", she's assured of getting recs and the usual idiotic outpouring of "Ditto that!"  It only proves how utterly insane most of them are that they continue to reply to a known and documented liar without calling her on it.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: miskie on January 07, 2009, 05:39:07 AM
I think they are searching desperately for anything that will validate their years-long belief that there will be something that will be used as an excuse by the current administration to never leave office.

and this is as close as its going to come. 
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: djones520 on January 07, 2009, 05:41:57 AM
I'm confused.  What imaginary violation has Bush committed now?
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: formerlurker on January 07, 2009, 06:20:41 AM
Sure, the White House usually only books events a few weeks in advance, so the Obamas calling in December to take over the Blair House (which is exactly what they would have done) two weeks early is no problem.   The world revolves around them. 

Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: Carl on January 07, 2009, 06:27:58 AM
As long as she's posting, "I hate Bush", she's assured of getting recs and the usual idiotic outpouring of "Ditto that!"  It only proves how utterly insane most of them are that they continue to reply to a known and documented liar without calling her on it.

In their distorted view of the world everything they disagree with is a "lie" while someone that has deliberately promoted a falsehood but it was for the cause can be excused.

It is the only way they can prevent their infantile little minds from imploding while trying to sort out the inconsistencies.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: mamacags on January 07, 2009, 07:21:01 AM
WOW! :o  That kind of insane is years in the making.  She really needs a very long vacation in a cushy "hotel" room with a long list of medications.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: BlueStateSaint on January 07, 2009, 07:26:56 AM
WOW! :o  That kind of insane is years in the making.  She really needs a very long vacation in a cushy "hotel" room with a long list of medications.

Probably some regular electroshock treatments, too.  They don't have to be "formal," either.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: Traveshamockery on January 07, 2009, 08:56:53 AM
Quote
rzemanfl  (1000+ posts)      Tue Jan-06-09 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
 
2. What a miserable, low-life, jug earred, lying ****wad, asshat turd the Supreme Court dumbmasses stuck us with.

I hope to live to piss on his grave.


Rzemanfl didn't quite make it clear if he or she was talking about Bush or Obama.  I choose to believe Rzemanfl subconsciously means Obama. 
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: franksolich on January 07, 2009, 09:07:34 AM
I never paid much attention to the lonestarnut primitive until she was pulling a Bostonian Drunkard during the presidential campaign last autumn, announcing things that never happened.

I've paid more attention since.

It's obvious the lonestarnut primitive is badly in need of institutionalization.

In fact, a very good case could be made for arguing that the lonestarnut primitive is more nuts than the subway cat, the phalloscraping primitive, or Doug's ex-wife.

That's really saying something; one hopes for her own good that the lonestarnut seeks intensive long-term psychiatric care soon, preferably in a confined setting.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: Carl on January 07, 2009, 09:50:25 AM
I never paid much attention to the lonestarnut primitive until she was pulling a Bostonian Drunkard during the presidential campaign last autumn, announcing things that never happened.

I've paid more attention since.

It's obvious the lonestarnut primitive is badly in need of institutionalization.

In fact, a very good case could be made for arguing that the lonestarnut primitive is more nuts than the subway cat, the phalloscraping primitive, or Doug's ex-wife.

That's really saying something; one hopes for her own good that the lonestarnut seeks intensive long-term psychiatric care soon, preferably in a confined setting.

On top of that Frank she is a particularly vicious person.
UP screams and carries on but somehow I don`t see it acting out the anger.
This person seems to have been a bully and mean all her life and I would have no doubt she would act on it given the chance.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: Traveshamockery on January 07, 2009, 09:57:28 AM
When fellow dummies start calling out one of their own for promising to deliver some sort of blockbuster news at a later time and then she doesn't deliver, she automatically puts herself one or two steps below the other dummies on the evolutionary chain. 
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: BEG on January 07, 2009, 12:15:18 PM
Call me uninformed, I knew about the article that said that Obama was denied access to the Blair House until the customary date that incoming presidents get but I don't understand why the OP is calling Bush a liar now.  Was there some report that Bush lied about having scheduled guests in the Blair House or something? 
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: franksolich on January 07, 2009, 12:23:53 PM
Was there some report that Bush lied about having scheduled guests in the Blair House or something?

Apparently only in the head of the lonestarnut primitive.

As another primitive mentioned, it's tradition that the incoming president and family move there five days before the inauguration, in this case January 15, and so there wasn't ever any problem with that.

But as for guests before that time, it's probably a pretty deeply-set precedent that the then-current president can pick-and-choose who's going to be there, as I'm sure the Impeached One, the Incompetent One, Lyndon Johnson, and Harry Truman did, and if the then-current president doesn't want anybody there, it's his prerogative.

The lonestarnut primitive was just looking for a reason, no matter how stupid or silly or trivial, to vent her Hate.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: debk on January 07, 2009, 12:24:32 PM
WOW.....that person, besides the obvious.....has an incredible amount of rage and hate built up inside.

Scary.....hope she doesn't own a gun.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: franksolich on January 07, 2009, 12:25:43 PM
WOW.....that person, besides the obvious.....has an incredible amount of rage and hate built up inside.

Scary.....hope she doesn't own a gun.

Hell, madam, given the mental state of the lonestarnut primitive, she could do serious bodily harm with a plastic paper clip.

She's just really nuts.
Title: Re: lonestarnut primitive having female problem again
Post by: jukin on January 07, 2009, 03:42:55 PM
I've read reports that when one starts to smoke marijuana that one's mental growth is stopped.  As I suspect that most primatives started in the early teens their attitudes of a tween or early teenager proves this point quite well.