The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Breaking News => Topic started by: BlueStateSaint on December 29, 2008, 09:24:14 AM
-
The "most transparent administration" seems pretty opaque when it comes to the nuts-and-bolts . . .
Obama fails to disclose transition meetings
LYNN SWEET | But he gets top grades on releasing donor info
December 29, 2008
BY LYNN SWEET Sun-Times Columnist
WASHINGTON -- The Obama team, pledging the ''most open and transparent transition in history,'' gets and ''A'' for disclosing donors to the Jan. 20 inauguration and a ''F'' when it comes to revealing transition meetings with groups. Contrary to its own ''seat at the table transparency policy,'' meetings are not posted on a Web site.
I'm giving a ''B'' to the Obama transition report on staff contacts with Gov. Blagojevich. The report was a summary narrative released last week of an internal inquiry into Gov. Blagojevich's selling-of-a-Senate seat scandal. While the Obama team deserves credit for disclosure -- including that President-elect Barack Obama and incoming White House staffers Valerie Jarrett and Rahm Emanuel met with federal prosecutors -- offering some notes or transcripts to support the conclusions would have been helpful.
During the presidential primary campaign, then candidate Obama, still an Illinois senator, made a pledge I heard for the first time on Oct. 24, 2007. In a school gym in Dover, N.H., Obama said if president, he would post his meetings on the Internet. That was interesting to me because Obama's Senate staff had been very selective about what Obama Senate-related meetings they disclosed and seemed to be guided by a ''less is best'' policy.
A month after the election, on Dec. 5, John Podesta, a transition co-chair, issued an Obama transparency policy. When it comes to meetings, ''the date and organizations represented at official meetings in the Transition headquarters or agency offices'' would be ''posted on our Web site,'' at www.change.gov.
More at:
http://www.suntimes.com/news/sweet/1352924,CST-NWS-sweet29.article
It would seem to me that, if you're going to say that you're going to be "transparent," you can't pick and choose what you're going to be tranparent with . . . But, that's just me.
-
I'm sure, Blue State, that if the big 0 thought that we needed to know something, he would tells us. After all, he is the best one to know whats good for us, and nurture us, and take care of our every need..... :sarcasm:
-
IMHO...Once again Team Messiah is telling us the rules are for us and not for them.
-
Good grades on donor disclosure? Really?
The author of this POS article owes me a new keyboard.
-
Good grades on donor disclosure? Really?
The author of this POS article owes me a new keyboard.
"...... gets and ''A'' for disclosing donors to the Jan. 20 inauguration ...."
You didn't think she was talking about those "other" donations, did you?