The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: jinxmchue on November 12, 2008, 10:04:52 AM

Title: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: jinxmchue on November 12, 2008, 10:04:52 AM
I kid you not.  They were discussing the gay marriage ban in California last night and this stupid ass reporter was asking the conservative guest what's next.  "Do we ban blondes marrying redheads?" she asked (or something very much like that).  "Where does it end?"

It ends with marriage being only between a man and a woman, you stupid cow.  No gays, no group marriages (already happening in European counties that enacted gay marriage), no animal marriages.  **** you.

See, what she did was steal our argument.  If we allow gay marriage, what else do we allow?  There's no reason to ban any other kind of marriage if gay marriage is allowed.  Doesn't quite work the other way, though, and becomes a ridiculous, unrealistic, impossible argument.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: Lord Undies on November 12, 2008, 10:45:29 AM
Quote
"Do we ban blondes marrying redheads?"

This sort of statement/question is pre-designed to create a certain emotion inside the viewer/listener's brain.  Its effectiveness is wholly dependent upon the tendency of emotion trumping logic, and it works about (I'd say) 65% of the time.   

It is one of the lefty/liberals most effective tools.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: jinxmchue on November 12, 2008, 10:48:01 AM
This sort of statement/question is pre-designed to create a certain emotion inside the viewer/listener's brain.  Its effectiveness is wholly dependent upon the tendency of emotion trumping logic, and it works about (I'd say) 65% of the time.   

It is one of the lefty/liberals most effective tools.

It is only effective on other liberals.  Conservatives have more brains than to fall for it.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on November 12, 2008, 11:21:51 AM
If we could outlaw biased-idiots marrying we could end her kind in a single generation.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: mamacags on November 12, 2008, 11:34:46 AM
The biggest question I have about this is why exactly were you watching CNN?
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: jinxmchue on November 12, 2008, 11:39:12 AM
The biggest question I have about this is why exactly were you watching CNN?

I'm an incurable channel surfer.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: mamacags on November 12, 2008, 11:57:49 AM
I can cure you.  Get another job!
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: CharlesD on November 12, 2008, 12:49:03 PM
Libs aren't pro choice when it comes to homosexual behavior.  Gays and straights already have equal rights.  Any man, gay or straight, can marry any woman he chooses.  Seems equal to me.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: Chris_ on November 12, 2008, 12:54:49 PM
If we could outlaw biased-idiots marrying we could end her kind in a single generation.
That's why I  :whatever: when I hear that homosexuality is heredetary.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair c
Post by: thundley4 on November 12, 2008, 01:02:05 PM
That's why I  :whatever: when I hear that homosexuality is heredetary.

If they ever do prove it to be hereditary , which I doubt, then they will also prove it to be a recessive gene.  I tend to believe that if found, it will be found paired with some other recessive gene. One that is most likely much more harmful to the race in general.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair c
Post by: Chris_ on November 12, 2008, 01:14:37 PM
If they ever do prove it to be hereditary , which I doubt, then they will also prove it to be a recessive gene.  I tend to believe that if found, it will be found paired with some other recessive gene. One that is most likely much more harmful to the race in general.

Don't they call shit like that "birth defects" when it's any other "trait"?
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair c
Post by: Thor on November 12, 2008, 01:21:23 PM
Don't they call shit like that "birth defects" when it's any other "trait"?

Yep
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: jinxmchue on November 12, 2008, 05:27:40 PM
I can cure you.  Get another job!

I will have a new one starting next week.  It involves cleaning up after someone, feeding them, bathing them, etc. - all without pay or gratitude!
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: Ptarmigan on November 12, 2008, 08:22:46 PM
Ever been to those CNN blogs? They are infested with moonbats.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair c
Post by: Jim on November 12, 2008, 08:46:15 PM
Don't they call shit like that "birth defects" when it's any other "trait"?



yes, but this isn't genetic, its purely environmental.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair c
Post by: Carl on November 12, 2008, 09:04:38 PM
If they ever do prove it to be hereditary , which I doubt, then they will also prove it to be a recessive gene.  I tend to believe that if found, it will be found paired with some other recessive gene. One that is most likely much more harmful to the race in general.

There is one reason and one reason alone that the homosexual community is hellbent on it being declared something a person is born as and that is to confer to themselves a protected minority status which is not possible if being a homosexual was by choice.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair c
Post by: Chris_ on November 12, 2008, 09:09:47 PM


yes, but this isn't genetic, its purely environmental.
True...being raised by or hanging around with moonbats just might do it.
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: MrsSmith on November 12, 2008, 09:47:26 PM
I kid you not.  They were discussing the gay marriage ban in California last night and this stupid ass reporter was asking the conservative guest what's next.  "Do we ban blondes marrying redheads?" she asked (or something very much like that).  "Where does it end?"

It ends with marriage being only between a man and a woman, you stupid cow.  No gays, no group marriages (already happening in European counties that enacted gay marriage), no animal marriages.  **** you.

See, what she did was steal our argument.  If we allow gay marriage, what else do we allow?  There's no reason to ban any other kind of marriage if gay marriage is allowed.  Doesn't quite work the other way, though, and becomes a ridiculous, unrealistic, impossible argument.

Not to mention the "elephant in the room."  No one was "banning gay marriage" for the thousands of years in which marriage was between men and women.  No one ever needed to ban it until some judges took it into hand to write law.  If the gay activists had not pushed this through the courts, there would still be no need to ban something that HAS NEVER BEEN LEGAL, OR TRUE.  Marriage is the relationship between a mother and a father into which they bring the children they create...or adopt.  Any other pairing, coupling, or otherwise-ing is something other than marriage.  What you do in your bedroom does not define marriage.  Believe it or not, it's not about who you're humping, it's about the family you create. 
Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: rich_t on November 12, 2008, 10:56:36 PM
That which is not defined as illegal by our laws is by default legal.



Title: Re: Stupid CNN bitch: gay marriage ban will lead to marriage ban based on hair color
Post by: AllosaursRus on November 13, 2008, 05:57:59 PM
Not to mention the "elephant in the room."  No one was "banning gay marriage" for the thousands of years in which marriage was between men and women.  No one ever needed to ban it until some judges took it into hand to write law.  If the gay activists had not pushed this through the courts, there would still be no need to ban something that HAS NEVER BEEN LEGAL, OR TRUE.  Marriage is the relationship between a mother and a father into which they bring the children they create...or adopt.  Any other pairing, coupling, or otherwise-ing is something other than marriage.  What you do in your bedroom does not define marriage.  Believe it or not, it's not about who you're humping, it's about the family you create. 

EXACTLY!!!!!! H5