The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: mamacags on November 06, 2008, 06:19:53 AM

Title: This time, election system worked. But why?
Post by: mamacags on November 06, 2008, 06:19:53 AM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081105/ap_on_re_us/no_more_recounts;_ylt=AnLXRchjMfhVUfW.dH4bY6FvzwcF


After all that fuss, the system worked. There was no meltdown, no flurry of lawsuits, no statewide demands for a presidential recount.

So does that mean America's voting machinery is finally fixed? And why did it work so well under record-setting turnout?

"Panic," said Doug Lewis, who heads Election Center, a nonprofit that works with voting officials across the country. "Everyone involved in conducting elections was just on pins and needles the entire year. Over-planning really helped."

There were extra precautions in nearly every precinct. In some areas, helicopters stood by to deliver touch-screen machines if extras were needed. Ballot orders were also increased.

The Election Assistance Commission, the federal agency that oversees voting systems and distributes money to improve them, recommended that local jurisdictions recruit twice as many poll workers as in previous elections.

"Election officials went to extraordinary lengths to have not only a Plan A, but a Plan B and a Plan C," Lewis said.

In the end, there were a few hiccups — some machines were slow to start up, and voter rolls were missing some names. But for the most part, the system functioned well.

It worked even under the onslaught of more than 133 million voters, the largest number in at least 40 years. Many of them waited for hours to choose between John McCain and Barack Obama, the first African-American elected president.

"The voters were enthusiastic and just glad to be in the process," Lewis said. "That attitude really helps. The day goes by much better."

All of which is good news, but no reason to get complacent, voting activists said.

"America had its game face on," said Doug Chapin, director of electionline.org at the Pew Center for the States. "Election officials and poll workers and voters were laser-focused on what they needed to do. They were willing to stand in line. They knew about early voting. They were vigilant about hiring extra poll workers."

Yet, Chapin said, "we need to do more. We didn't have a close election, and that took some of the pressure off."
(more at link)




IT WORKED THIS TIME BECAUSE YOU WHINY BITCHES WON FINALLY!  ARE THEY REALLY THIS FREAKING STUPID!?!??!
Title: Re: This time, election system worked. But why?
Post by: franksolich on November 06, 2008, 06:33:09 AM
Yeah, mom, they're stupid.
Title: Re: This time, election system worked. But why?
Post by: DumbAss Tanker on November 06, 2008, 09:04:49 AM
Everything moves freely when the tolerances are loose.  If it was a 1%-margin election in a pivotal electoral state there would be lawsuits out the ass.  As it is, the margin of victory for Obama makes that a futile exercise, no matter how much bad stuff occurred, it wasn't enough to have changed the outcome.  This is NOT the same thing as everybody agreeing that no bad stuff really occurred. 
Title: Re: This time, election system worked. But why?
Post by: Wretched Excess on November 06, 2008, 09:26:11 AM

wanna hear something creepy?  turnout was flat in ohio, and down in cuyahoga county.

2004:  673,777 total votes in cuyahoga county;  5,527,908 total votes in ohio
2008:  652,086 total votes in cuyahoga county;  5,565,850 total votes in ohio

I suppose they could still be counting dead people, and they all vote absentee.