The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: Atomic Lib Smasher on October 26, 2008, 09:21:12 PM
-
By none other than DU's own version of Fred Sanford.
Husb2Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts)
Sun Oct-26-08 10:13 PM
Original message
I really just wanna stand on their necks
No jumpin' ...... no stompin' ....... just stand on their necks until they change their minds.
is that wrong?
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sun Oct-26-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is wrong. That is very wrong.
Breaking their finger joints one by one is not wrong. Electrifying their genitalia is not wrong. Waterboarding them is not wrong. Putting brainworms into their ears is a little bit wrong.
But standing on their necks? That is very wrong.
Is this what we are to expect in the re-education camps during the reign of the Obamafurhen? Good thing I still own guns. But with some of these DUmmies, I doubt I'd need 'em.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4315244
-
It looks like to me the sparkling husband primitive just lost another argument with the wife.
-
Come on Sparkly .I'm sure there are plenty of men around that will be willing to give you a shot right before they bury your ass in the middle of the street with a good hard right to the jaw. Your Dentist might be able to send his kid to college after all.
-
Does this idiot think we will go quietly?
-
DUmbshit, try it. Please. Try it.
-
God forbid that pathetic piece of squirrelbait ever has power over another person. Hopefully his own inadequacies will limit him from anything but acting out his sadistic overlord fantasies on any victim besides Sparkly's kitteh, on whom he wouldn't dare leave a visible mark lest she kick his mewling ass.
-
Hey Hubs, don't sing it, bring it, bitch. Unlike probably most out there, I LOOK for one of you kooks to confront me.
-
Backasswards as usual. If a lib ever got physical with a conservative, it would be more like the conservative stepping on a fat dog tick.... :hammer:
-
By none other than DU's own version of Fred Sanford.
Is this what we are to expect in the re-education camps during the reign of the Obamafurhen? Good thing I still own guns. But with some of these DUmmies, I doubt I'd need 'em.
Please tell the DUmmies that we appreciate the ideas and they will find them utilized at the Camps on Nov 5.
-
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Sun Oct-26-08 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. That is wrong. That is very wrong.
Breaking their finger joints one by one is not wrong. Electrifying their genitalia is not wrong. Waterboarding them is not wrong.
I bet you typed that line of BS one handed didn't you? :loser:
You and your pathetic dope smoking brethren wouldn't have the combined strength to do any of that keyboard commando crap you speak of to me or anyone else for that matter.
-
Has the sparkling husband primitive ever given out his name and address? No. He's a keyboard commando shooting off his mouth about his totalitarian fantasizes. He probably has visions of moving out of the basement bathroom or having the courage to move the cat litter box to another room, too.
.
-
Link?
-
Link?
Fix0rd. Sorry 'bout that. :doh:
-
Fix0rd. Sorry 'bout that. :doh:
No problem, I just like reading Fred Sanford's threads in total. :-)
-
He reminds me of a typical wanna-be gangbanger. He'll be hard and run his head in front of his boys, but drag him off in an alley out of camera range and give him a good thump across the melon, he'll soil himself and cry like the little girl that he is.
-
donutwant (4 posts) Mon Oct-27-08 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. Some conservatives are following this thread...
Just thought you guys might be interested.
http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=776974
With that it pretty much died.
Real brave souls when someone is watching. :rotf:
-
Has the sparkling husband primitive ever given out his name and address? No. He's a keyboard commando shooting off his mouth about his totalitarian fantasizes. He probably has visions of moving out of the basement bathroom or having the courage to move the cat litter box to another room, too.
Actually he has, although unwittingly.
He's a landlord in Baltimore, inherited money.
As for his name, he's of Italianate derivation it seems, unless he took his wife's last name.
-
Actually he has, although unwittingly.
He's a landlord in Baltimore, inherited money.
As for his name, he's of Italianate derivation it seems, unless he took his wife's last name.
You've a much stronger stomach for diving the reefs of Skin's Island for barnacled wreckage such H2S, but by the obviously inferior role he occupies in the relationship, it sounds like the 'Inherited money' was on her side, not his...or else that she has his balls in a vice with some sort of goods that could send him away somewhere for upwards of 10 years if he does anything to piss her off. In the latter case, the most likely scenario would be her possession of an archive of computerized image files ripped untimely (and unencrypted) from his hard drive, and data making them traceable directly to him....
-
Will he be stepping on our necks before or after his wife makes him dust the furniture in his "special" French maid's outfit? :rotf:
-
Will he be stepping on our necks before or after his wife makes him dust the furniture in his "special" French maid's outfit? :rotf:
The only H2S will be "stepping on our necks" will be if he takes 8"x10" glossies of us first.
-
You've a much stronger stomach for diving the reefs of Skin's Island for barnacled wreckage such H2S, but by the obviously inferior role he occupies in the relationship, it sounds like the 'Inherited money' was on her side, not his...or else that she has his balls in a vice with some sort of goods that could send him away somewhere for upwards of 10 years if he does anything to piss her off. In the latter case, the most likely scenario would be her possession of an archive of computerized image files ripped untimely (and unencrypted) from his hard drive, and data making them traceable directly to him....
I suspect it's just another one of those Edward VIII-Wallis Warfield Simpson things; and that the sparkling husband primitive grew up either without a strong male figure in the house, or had an acrimonious relation with his father; as the sparkling husband primitive is in his early 60s, I speculate it's the latter.
I don't think the sparkling husband primitive's wife "has something" on him; given the tenor of his posts, I suspect more his submission is debasingly voluntary (and so she takes advantage of it), and that there's a Great Civil War going on inside of him, because he does at times give clues that he subconsciously resents himself being so utterly servile.
In other words, the sparkling husband primitive seems to be a wimp; and one must remember that wimps do have flashes of what makes them male, once in a while.
The Bostonian Drunkard unleashes a volley against George Bush every time the Bostonian Drunkard has an argument with his father; it's very easy to detect that the sparkling husband primitive has argued with the wife, and lost, every time he gets really huffy.
-
Hey Hubs, don't sing it, bring it, bitch. Unlike probably most out there, I LOOK for one of you kooks to confront me.
+1 bud. I PRAY for one of these assholes to "confront" me in some manner as stated above. I don't think the out come would be in their favor. :foff:
-
I suspect it's just another one of those Edward VIII-Wallis Warfield Simpson things; and that the sparkling husband primitive grew up either without a strong male figure in the house, or had an acrimonious relation with his father; as the sparkling husband primitive is in his early 60s, I speculate it's the latter.
I don't think the sparkling husband primitive's wife "has something" on him; given the tenor of his posts, I suspect more his submission is debasingly voluntary (and so she takes advantage of it), and that there's a Great Civil War going on inside of him, because he does at times give clues that he subconsciously resents himself being so utterly servile.
In other words, the sparkling husband primitive seems to be a wimp; and one must remember that wimps do have flashes of what makes them male, once in a while.
The Bostonian Drunkard unleashes a volley against George Bush every time the Bostonian Drunkard has an argument with his father; it's very easy to detect that the sparkling husband primitive has argued with the wife, and lost, every time he gets really huffy.
You may well be right, but there is just an indefinable something I sense from dealing with dirtballs and their evasive witnesses over the years that screams to me that there is a good deal more to this than meets the eye. His uncontrolled and chaotic keyboard bravado, empty as an Obama plan though it might be, does not square with the sort of personality necessary to sustain a long-term relationship relying on a purely dom/sub or master/slave basis, to my eye.
-
You may well be right, but there is just an indefinable something I sense from dealing with dirtballs and their evasive witnesses over the years that screams to me that there is a good deal more to this than meets the eye. His uncontrolled and chaotic keyboard bravado, empty as an Obama plan though it might be, does not square with the sort of personality necessary to sustain a long-term relationship relying on a purely dom/sub or master/slave basis, to my eye.
Right, sir, and I agree.
As an attorney, you're seeing things I can't see.
As a deaf person, I'm looking at things generally unnoticed by hearing people.
We're on different (but parallel) paths, but we're both going the same direction, and the distance between the two parallel paths is narrowing.