The Conservative Cave
Current Events => Archives => Politics => Election 2008 => Topic started by: megimoo on October 23, 2008, 07:32:56 AM
-
Four years ago, when I had just about completed the lengthy legal and financial vetting process required by the U.S. government to place my then-92-year-old-mother in a nursing home, I was asked to produce her birth certificate as “proof†of her citizenship.
While she was born in America, had voted in every election for untold decades, and paid her taxes religiously, that wasn’t good enough to qualify my elderly mother –deaf, legally blind, and confined to a wheelchair – to be admitted to the facility I had chosen for her near my home.
Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn’t speak English. Despairing that she would never be “qualified†to receive the care she desperately needed, I set about to find the document, which I was sure had vanished in the unreliable record-keeping of 1913.
First I called an official in Hartford, the capitol of Connecticut, who recommended that I call the Storrs record-keeping office.
That took two minutes.
Next I called the Storrs office and was told to call another number.
That took two minutes.
When I called the third number, I explained to the woman who answered the phone that I was “asking something impossible.†I gave her my mother’s first name and her father’s last name.
Within four minutes, she said, “Here it is!†She had found my mother’s birth certificate, and it surprised me when I learned my mother’s “real†first name and “real†last name had changed significantly as she and her family became Americanized.
When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: “That’s nothing…we’re routinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s, and we do that all the time!â€
Total time it took me to find my mother’s 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate: 10 minutes!
WHERE IS OBAMA’S?
To this date, Barack Obama has refused – or been unable –to produce an authentic birth certificate that attests to the fact he is an American-born citizen. He has had more than the two-years of campaigning for the presidency of the United States to do this, but failed.
Why is this important? Because the Constitution of the United States expressly forbids anyone born on foreign soil to run for the highest office in our land!
You would think that Obama would have volunteered the “proof†of his eligibility within a nanosecond of entering the race. But here we are, less than two weeks away from the election, and Americans still don’t know if Obama is an American!
While Obama’s camp submitted a supposedly authentic birth certificate to the far-left blog Daily Kos, it was found to have been a photo-shopped version of the birth certificate of his half-sister, who was actually born in Hawaii, as Obama claims he was.
While this glaring omission in Obama’s eligibility to become the most powerful man on earth mystified some and rankled others, a few people – clearly alarmed at what they considered a stealth candidate’s attempt to dance his way around the Constitution and venture into the realm of criminality– took action.
SLEUTH #1
The first sleuth was lawyer Philip J. Berg, a Democrat from Pennsylvania and an undisguised Hillary fan.
Last August, Berg – a former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania and one-time candidate for both governor and senator –filed a lawsuit in Federal Court (Berg vs. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-cv-4083) seeking a Declaratory Judgment and an Injunction against Obama, alleging that the first-term Illinois senator did not meet the qualifications to be President of the United States.
Berg’s suit was based on Obama’s failure to answer satisfactorily the question of where he was born. Was it in Hawaii, Kenya, or Indonesia? Was his legal name Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro (his stepfather’s surname), Barry Obama, Barack Dunham (his maternal grandparents’ surname), or Barry Dunham? snip
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/5745
-
and still, all we get from the msm is *crickets*
-
Hell, to join the military, one MUST produce a birth Certificate and a Social Security Account Number. They also prefer to record a driver's license number, if possible. Green Cards are also accepted. To get a driver's license, one MUST produce a birth Certificate and some states require a SSAN Card. Even other states require TWO forms of ID. Why isn't it written that a Presidential candidate be required to prove their eligibility ?? Just doesn't make any sense to me
-
Hell, to join the military, one MUST produce a birth Certificate and a Social Security Account Number. They also prefer to record a driver's license number, if possible. Green Cards are also accepted. To get a driver's license, one MUST produce a birth Certificate and some states require a SSAN Card. Even other states require TWO forms of ID. Why isn't it written that a Presidential candidate be required to prove their eligibility ?? Just doesn't make any sense to me
Maybe he has. Obviously there is nothing that says he is not required to prove it to us, yet. But maybe the FEC or whatever requires it. That may explain why their going to bat for him in those lawsuits.
-
Maybe he has. Obviously there is nothing that says he is not required to prove it to us, yet. But maybe the FEC or whatever requires it. That may explain why their going to bat for him in those lawsuits.
The FEC never claimed to have seen any proof. Their statement was that the plaintiffs had no legal standing to file the case.
-
Hell, to join the military, one MUST produce a birth Certificate and a Social Security Account Number. They also prefer to record a driver's license number, if possible. Green Cards are also accepted. To get a driver's license, one MUST produce a birth Certificate and some states require a SSAN Card. Even other states require TWO forms of ID. Why isn't it written that a Presidential candidate be required to prove their eligibility ?? Just doesn't make any sense to me
I don't know about now, but when I went into the Army there was a draft going on. I enlisted. I had no proof of my SS number. They issued me a new one right then and there.
-
I don't know about now, but when I went into the Army there was a draft going on. I enlisted. I had no proof of my SS number. They issued me a new one right then and there.
I joined in the mid 70s. A SSAN Card was required back then. When I was recruiting from 1986-1990, the were also mandatory.