The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: GOBUCKS on October 16, 2008, 06:04:09 PM
-
Dummy stevenumbers has apparently still not scored. He is desperate for a woman, any woman.
He would jump Underground Panther in the blink of an eye.
He isn't really sure what to do with a woman if he ever gets one, but he knows they have something he needs.
His posts are unmatched in how dumb, timid, and apologetic they are.
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-16-08 01:46 PM
Original message
Poll question: If a person works very hard and plays by the rules, he/she deserves to earn...
how much per year before taxes ? Just curious on what people think.
Poll result (46 votes)
$100,000 per year (5 votes, 11%) Vote
$250,000 per year (1 votes, 2%) Vote
$500,000 per year (0 votes, 0%) Vote
$1,000,000 per year (3 votes, 7%) Vote
Unlimited amount of money per year (25 votes, 54%) Vote
Other (see my post) (12 votes, 26%) Vote
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4249570
redqueen (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-16-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ugh... look at those results.
I can't stand greed.
A couple of DUmmies actually try to answer this stupid question:
YOY (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-16-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. All depending on just what they do and how valued they are to society I have to go for the Mil.
If not more.
A fantastic author, a brilliant pioneering surgeon, a true fiscal genius, a ground breaking genius, a ultra-talented programmer
If they are hardworking, play-by-the-rules, and INNOVATIVE in their benefit to society yes.
Now if they are hardworking and non-beneficial to anyone? F**k 'em.
The rest of us, hard-working and play-by-the-rules...'bout 100K more or less.
In the case of DUmmies, far, far far less.
gateley (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-16-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Unlimited - as long as you're playing by the rules -- the GOOD rules, not
the GOP rules, I think you should get as much as you desire.
Let the good times roll.
DUmmy stevenumbers comes back to apologize for his stupid poll.
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Thu Oct-16-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. To add a bit more clarification...
I know this poll was deeply flawed. The whole JTP/taxes discussion got me thinking back to what my older brother told me years ago about earned income. He said, in so many words, that people who made "too much" money were depriving others. I never really believed that, but it stuck in my head.
I'm probably incorrect, but my understanding of "pure communism" is you earn what you need. My understanding of "pure capitalism" is you earn what you can get, up to an unlimited amount. Under a "pure socialism" system, I have no idea what the pay scales are like. Yes, I know this poll was not necessary but I've thought about this on and off for years.
DUmmy stevenumbers is truly the dumbest person who ever turned on a computer. He is rivalled only by DUmmy sfexpat2000, Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee, and, of course, Cynthia McKinney.
-
Minimum wage should be $100,000/year................. but bread has to be $35/loaf.
-
Can someone please tell me how someone who makes "too much" money deprives someone else? I never got this nuance of liberalism.
-
Can someone please tell me how someone who makes "too much" money deprives someone else? I never got this nuance of liberalism.
The same way that people who enjoy fraptious health deprive those who are sickly.
In order to restore the balance, all really, super healthy people need to be taken to labs and exposed to deadly pathogens and as they get sick the sickly will get healthier.
-
Can someone please tell me how someone who makes "too much" money deprives someone else? I never got this nuance of liberalism.
Duh.
There is only one huge pile of money. It is finite. If you take more than 'your fair share' then you are depriving those who slept in and didn't make it to the pile of money early enough.
Damn. I don't know why we have to keep 'splainin this.
KC
-
Ahh yes, Steve2470.
The numbers stand for 2" penis, 47 years old and 0% chance of ever getting any.
-
Can someone please tell me how someone who makes "too much" money deprives someone else? I never got this nuance of liberalism.
It's a false assumption by the Marxist left that all wealth is zero sum and no new wealth can be created. Therefore, to have more money than someone else is to be exploiting that person.
Basically, as with so many other things, they don't know thier ass from a hole in the ground when it comes to economics.
-
Can someone please tell me how someone who makes "too much" money deprives someone else? I never got this nuance of liberalism.
Well, see, it's like breathing too much air or flushing your toilet too much. If that isn't clear enough for you, you probably need to watch "An Inconvenient Truth" again.
:rotf: