The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on October 13, 2026, 07:41:27 AM
-
orangecrush (33,545 posts)
WHY ISN'T THE JUDGE WHO SIGNED THE SEARCH WARRANT ON REP OMAR BEING IDENTIFIED?
WTAF?
kentuck (117,514 posts)
1. What!!?
Is her name Ailene Cannon?
Wednesdays (24,583 posts)
4. Yeah, anybody with a laser printer
...can print out a document that looks like an official warrant.
Chasstev365 (9,623 posts)
6. Gee, we used to have JOURNALISTS who be working now to identify the judge
Ocelot II (133,654 posts)
7. It would have been a magistrate judge in D.C. (it was her D.C. home that was raided),
and there are four of them. https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/magistrate-judges
The application for a warrant has to state that there is probable cause to believe that material evidence of a crime is at the place to be searched, but this wouldn't be the first time that one of the regime's goons lied on a search warrant application.
https://democraticunderground.com/100221557913
Sick sick ****s. Something does not go there way they go all Mao.
-
The 4 DC magistrates appointment dates: February 2015, September 2020, September 2022, October 2024
Do the math, dipshits.
-
‘Judicially authorized search warrant’
https://www.americanexperiment.org/judicially-authorized-search-warrant/ (https://www.americanexperiment.org/judicially-authorized-search-warrant/)
That’s the key: a federal judge signed off on the search warrant. Most likely, the signer was a federal magistrate judge in the District of Columbia. He or she would have been hired by the heavily-Democratic cohort of judges in the district. That magistrate judge has placed his or her career on the line in signing that warrant. To gain that signature, the judge would have to be convinced that probable cause exists that a federal crime was committed.
As a matter of course, that warrant would have been filed under seal. So, there’s no need to speculate on what this is all about, it has been recorded in the affidavit.
1. If I understand this correctly, the warrant being under seal is normal process.
2. The magistrate judges are all Dems (Trump also pointed this out and gave their four names).
3. The above being the case, the pertinent judge would have been especially diligent about the quantity, quality, and relevance of the evidence supporting the purpose of the search.
4. Progs being what they are, even if what was seized prove criminal wrongdoing - regardless of by whom - whichever judged signed the warrant will be the target of Dem retaliation if they ever get the power to do so.
As for:
Wednesdays (24,583 posts)
4. Yeah, anybody with a laser printer
...can print out a document that looks like an official warrant.
Is Wednesdays so stooooopid as to think (s)he would think of this absurdity before Ilhan Omar and her minions would? :thatsright:
Ocelot II (133,654 posts)
7. It would have been a magistrate judge in D.C. (it was her D.C. home that was raided),
and there are four of them. https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/magistrate-judges
The application for a warrant has to state that there is probable cause to believe that material evidence of a crime is at the place to be searched, but this wouldn't be the first time that one of the regime's goons lied on a search warrant application.
Ocelot II tossed cold water reality into some DU thread a week or two ago, and probably garnered some Post Reports. This one probably will as well. :popcorn:
-
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HUcsbhBWIAAmE2p?format=jpg&name=large)