"Consistency is the bugaboo of small minds, smaller anyway than those of the intellectual elite at DU." It is, for instance, simultaneously possible for the (Republican) President to be too stupid and incompetent to be in office while at the same time orchestrating conspiracies extenidng over tens of decades and around the globe, all without detection.
I'm about done compiling a history of Skins's island, which will be added to DU for guests, which is stickied in the DUmping Ground.
Probably by the time I ever get done with it, DU for guests will cover about as much area as the Great Plains, but nothing can be done about it. One accepts, adapts, and moves on.
Anyway, while tying up the loose ends of the history, I've already started compiling a bunch of helpful hints for one to use when observing the primitives.....well, actually, I've thought of two, so far.
If anybody's got any suggestions for more helpful hints, I'd like to hear them.
The first is:
DUmmies lie; all the time, DUmmies lie.
After which follows an explanation of why this is helpful to remember when observing the primitives on Skins's island.
The second is:
None of the primitives are important enough, relevant enough, to be "in" on anything; to be "connected" to "sources," or in a position to have "inside information" on anybody or anything.
After which follows an explanation of why this is helpful to remember when observing the DUmmies in DUmmieland.
Wow frank, you've amazed me once again. I swear if I wasn't married I'd move to Nebraska and stalk you.
Cindie
Wow frank, you've amazed me once again. I swear if I wasn't married I'd move to Nebraska and stalk you.
Cindie
Wow frank, you've amazed me once again. I swear if I wasn't married I'd move to Nebraska and stalk you.
Cindie
Just look for the famhouse surrounded by a dozen or more cats. :lmao:
There has to be something about what you discovered regarding their source links and the accuracy of.
The circular part...lefty blog to lefty website to lefty blog and back as well.
There has to be something about what you discovered regarding their source links and the accuracy of.
The circular part...lefty blog to lefty website to lefty blog and back as well.
I'm still trying to think of snappy one-liners to explain Tanker's and USA4ME's suggestions.
Yours is good, too.
I assume you're referring to when a primitive posts a link to some story, and at the same time tells the other primitives what the story's about.....the result being the primitives don't check the link.....and oftentimes what the primitive's told the other primitives the story says, isn't true.
Like that really stupid Patrick Buchanan thing, about how Patrick Buchanan said slavery was the best thing that ever happened to blacks in America, whereas when one checked the link, it turned out Patrick Buchanan had said no such thing, not even anything close to that.
Is that what you're getting at, sir?
Yes,that was the original you found and since then have discovered there are lots of links to left wing personal blogs where stories are told without any validating source.
These are linked and cross linked to give the appearance of an "official" news or government source when all they are is any joe putting their opinion on their own blog site.
"Soldiers are just cowards with their backs against the wall. The lowest
IQ men in our society, those incapable of normal careers, enlist. Their
choice in life: prison or the military.
Some will have to die in the support of our cause."
I'm still trying to think of snappy one-liners to explain Tanker's and USA4ME's suggestions.
Yours is good, too.
I assume you're referring to when a primitive posts a link to some story, and at the same time tells the other primitives what the story's about.....the result being the primitives don't check the link.....and oftentimes what the primitive's told the other primitives the story says, isn't true.
Like that really stupid Patrick Buchanan thing, about how Patrick Buchanan said slavery was the best thing that ever happened to blacks in America, whereas when one checked the link, it turned out Patrick Buchanan had said no such thing, not even anything close to that.
Is that what you're getting at, sir?
Not prepared to word it just yet (certainly open for someone else to do so), but some reference to how they continually practice the "politics of personal destruction" towards those whom they disagree. They can't win discussing the issues, so they have to go personal. We've had more than enough evidence of that being the case over the past several years.
Also their hypocracy in condemning Republican/conservatives for the very things that when Democrats/liberals do the exact same thing they find ways of which to justify.