The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on April 17, 2026, 07:06:57 AM
-
surfered (13,732 posts)
Found on Facebook..
(https://i.pixi.mg/i/f2d5743d6066fe5da642df22.jpeg)
KPN (17,422 posts)
2. There are plenty of them ... Republicans that fit that
description. All the MAGAts for sure … plus some and likely a lot.
Blue Owl (59,284 posts)
4. The other thing that really bothers me about cases like this...
Is how when it's a Democratic figure, everyone believes the women coming forward (as it should be). But as with the Epstein files, those women are not given the same credibility.
The ONLY difference is the (D) and the (R).
modrepub (4,137 posts)
8. Because They Were Poor
And the offenders were rich with resources.
What a lot of people forget is the economic disparity between the offenders and the victims. If you were largely powerless, would you want to be put through the embarrassing details and mass media attention of an Epstein or Trump trial (especially those so young of age)? Would the victims keep their stories straight under withering questions in discovery and on the stand? How would the victims react under public scrutiny, talking heads and the media circus? I can understand how a prosecutor would be hesitant to move forward given these conditions or even if the victims would be able to hold it together throughout a trial.
I'm not saying this situation is right. I just think the reality of how we treat rich versus poor in our legal system stacks the deck in the rich and powerful's favor.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221178365
The stupid flows once again at the DUmp
-
They need better lubes to help their butthurt. Maybe those seat cushions with holes in the middle.
-
In the real world, Trump was not "adjudicated" a sexual assaulter, of any kind. A Trump-Hating judge expressing his personal opinion from the bench is not adjudicating anything.
And unlike that sex-fantasizing gossip columnist and that female who told 4 significantly different stories in 4 FBI interviews, against Swillwell there is evidence that corroborate times and locations, and the women are not changing their stories every time they tell them.
-
And if Democrats knew about Swalwell’s crimes for years and said nothing, neither do they.
-
In the real world, Trump was not "adjudicated" a sexual assaulter, of any kind. A Trump-Hating judge expressing his personal opinion from the bench is not adjudicating anything.
It must drive them nuts that since the jury found him not guilty that they can't refer to him as a convicted sexual assaulter so they have to call him merely adjudicated. It's a constant reminder to them that only their biased lefty judge only did it and accordingly it has no merit.
And nobody even falsely accused Trump of drugging them and raping them whereas Swalwell has two with credible accuations of that.
-
President Trump "adjudicated" of being a "sexual assaulter" by a judge is on the same level as Mar-a-Lago being valued at ~ 18 million. ::)
-
President Trump "adjudicated" of being a "sexual assaulter" by a judge is on the same level as Mar-a-Lago being valued at ~ 18 million. ::)
Using words without knowing what they mean is a DU specialty.