The Conservative Cave

Current Events => General Discussion => Topic started by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on December 11, 2025, 03:29:11 PM

Title: WI Judge In Trump Electors Case Didn’t Write His Own Ruling
Post by: SSG Snuggle Bunny on December 11, 2025, 03:29:11 PM
Quote
Explosive new court documents unsealed Tuesday detail the alleged judicial misconduct of the Wisconsin judge presiding over a politically-driven criminal case targeting the attorneys who represented the 2020 Trump campaign in the battleground Badger State. Dane County Circuit Court Judge John Hyland had outside help from a former judge with a “grudge,” according to the court filings.

Hyland, in so many words, told defendants to go pound sand. He will not remove himself from the case and the march to a perfectly-timed election-year trial will go on. To the people who feel more than ever that it will be impossible to get a fair trial in far-left Dane County, the judge effectively said, Trust me.

...

How does Troupis’ legal team know that Remington wrote the order? They enlisted the services of Georgetown professor Natalie Schilling, an internationally-recognized forensic linguistics expert who has logged a lot of hours on cases involving authorship attribution. And Schilling, according to the affidavit she signed, found Hyland’s “sardonic” order brimming with Remington’s “distinct style.” She compared several court documents written by Remington to the Hyland order and discovered that style was “parroted throughout.”

“Reviewing some of the retired Judge’s prior orders, they all had the same flavor: they were written in the first person, they had the same structure, and often had the same sardonic tone,” Schilling wrote.

...

What tipped Troupis’ legal team off? Bugni said he shared Hyland’s order within his office. His colleagues quickly suspected that the judge had not written the ruling. Bugni added that an attorney who represented Troupis in a related civil case told him he suspected Remington wrote it, based on the “style and tone.”

The initial suspicion proved even more credible, Bugni wrote, when Remington’s son, a law clerk, appeared in the order’s metadata. 


https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/10/documents-wisconsin-judge-in-trump-electors-case-didnt-write-his-own-ruling/