The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: DUmpDiver on May 09, 2024, 10:18:22 PM

Title: Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Post by: DUmpDiver on May 09, 2024, 10:18:22 PM
Quote
BumRushDaShow (129,806 posts)
Thu May 9, 2024, 01:08 PM
2
RECOMMEND
Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Last edited Thu May 9, 2024, 08:39 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: CNN Politics

Updated 4:48 PM EDT, Thu May 9, 2024


CNN — Hunter Biden’s latest attempts to throw out his federal gun case were rejected in back-to-back rulings Thursday, teeing up a high-stakes criminal trial next month in Delaware.

The president’s son had asked the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss the charges by overturning prior decisions from the trial judge that let the case move forward. But the appellate panel instead rejected Hunter Biden’s appeals, which related to his defunct plea deal and his claims that the case was tainted by political bias.

Hours later, the trial judge, Maryellen Noreika, rejected Hunter Biden’s remaining motion to dismiss the case based on Second Amendment grounds.

The rulings pave the way for the first-ever trial against the child of a sitting US president. They’re also a victory for special counsel David Weiss, who is prosecuting Hunter Biden in two separate criminal cases and is fending off aggressive pushback from his lawyers.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/09/politics/hunter-biden-gun-charge/index.html



https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143238101

Of course they all want to give Hunter a pass but I brought it over for this one:

Quote
maxsolomon (33,440 posts)
6. AFAIK, no one has ever been charged solely for falsely answering
Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Thu May 9, 2024, 02:15 PM
Form 4473 Question F.

Yet probably 100s of 1,000s of people falsely answer it every year. I look forward to every one of them being prosecuted, as this clearly establishes a precedent.

People have been convicted. The precedent has already been established.

Quote
Federal Prosecutors Aggressively Pursuing Those Who Lie in Connection With Firearm Transactions
OKLAHOMA CITY — The Western District of Oklahoma is aggressively seeking to keep firearms out of the wrong hands by pursuing those who lie in connection with gun purchases.  Several recent cases charged in federal court highlight these efforts.

AMY CARWILE, 46, and KEVIN CARWILE, 48, both of Purcell, Oklahoma, were sentenced on August 3, 2022, to serve three months in federal prison.

EDDIE WAYNE MORRISON, 34 of Duncan, Oklahoma, was sentenced to time-served, or essentially 16 months in federal custody, on December 29, 2022, for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm.

HALEY LEEANNE ADKISON, 24, of Oklahoma City, pleaded guilty on August 18, 2022, to making a false statement during a firearms transaction.


And more at the link below:
https://www.atf.gov/news/pr/federal-prosecutors-aggressively-pursuing-those-who-lie-connection-firearm-transactions



Title: Re: Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Post by: SVPete on May 10, 2024, 08:12:22 AM
Quote
maxsolomon (33,440 posts)
6. AFAIK, no one has ever been charged solely for falsely answering 1.
Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Thu May 9, 2024, 02:15 PM
Form 4473 Question F.

Yet probably 100s of 1,000s of people 2. a. falsely answer it every year 2. b.. I look forward to every one of them being prosecuted 3., as this clearly establishes a precedent. 4.

1. Your ignorance does not prove your claim.

2. a. Your fantasy numbers are absurd.

2. b. Well, if "Everybody does it," if everybody jumps off a cliff will you jump off a cliff? Please?

3. I would have no problem with prosecuting people who lie on the gun purchase background check form, even if I were the one who lied. It's called "Perjury". Yet DUmmie maxsolomon objects to Hunter being prosecuted for his perjury. The only standards DU-grade Progs have are double.

4. False premise, false conclusion.
Title: Re: Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Post by: Old n Grumpy on May 10, 2024, 09:09:24 AM
He needs to face the music, not only for the gun charges for corruption, drugs, and whatever else they can think of to smack on his privileged butt
Title: Re: Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Post by: CollectivismMustDie on May 10, 2024, 10:44:11 AM
Quote
. Garland's special counsel,
21 hrs ago
Weiss, a Trump nominee, couldn't find a link between Hunter/Joe/Burisma/China, so after 6 years of investigation Weiss went further and found a gun application crime, and Hunter not paying his taxes.



Other than...you know...receipts.

Quote
ScratchCat
7. Yet nothing but *crickets* from the right wing gun lovers
21 hrs ago
Every person who has a State Medical Cannabis card and who has purchased a firearm could be charged as well, yet none ever have.

Odd, isn't it, that every RW legal type isn't shouting from the roof tops about how unconstitutional and fascist this is


Nothing but crickets from the left wing gun haters. Odd how none of them are screaming about gun crime. How long before they snap and start leaning on the second amendment?




Title: Re: Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Post by: SVPete on May 10, 2024, 11:19:22 AM
Quote
ScratchCat
7. Yet nothing but *crickets* from the right wing gun lovers
21 hrs ago
Every person who has a State Medical Cannabis card and who has purchased a firearm could be charged as well, yet none ever have.

Odd, isn't it, that every RW legal type isn't shouting from the roof tops about how unconstitutional and fascist this is

Prosecuting Hunter Biden for perjury on a Federal form is unconstitutional? Please provide the relevant Article and Section or the relevant Amendment number.

My "cricket" has been chirping Damn well about time! continually since I first heard of Hunter's appeals being rejected.
Title: Re: Back-to-back rulings against Hunter Biden pave way for June gun trial
Post by: Airwolf on May 10, 2024, 03:08:23 PM
Yes, it is odd how the DUmmies are s0 protective of someone that has violated gun laws solely because they have a D next to their name. If it were any of us, we would be in jail serving time and they would have multiple threads about it. Nothing like their lack of consistency to keep us entertained.