The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on June 13, 2023, 06:54:29 AM
-
Star Member Lunabell (4,446 posts)
Happy Arraignment Day!
I'm celebrating at home with Chinese food and Mexican beer!! Maybe later we'll cook up some Chicken Kiev or I'll look up an authentic recipe for Jollof rice, a Nigerian specialty. In your face, you racist pos traitor!
Now, I just need some drag entertainment to finalize my party!!
46 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Woohoo! I'll be celebrating!
45 (98%)
No, I'm not celebrating. Just another day.
1 (2%)
What's Indictment Day?
0 (0%)
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernamesDisclaimer: This is an Internet poll
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100218000757
Shove your poll where the sun doesn't shine DUmmies
-
Lunabell should be called lunatic :thatsright:
Those people are sick :thatsright:
-
KS Toronado (13,191 posts)
10. I'll celebrate only if they lock him up today
for being a clear and present danger to the United States.
Do you think the Red Commie primitive KC Fascist has any idea where that "clear and present danger" phrase originated?
Schenck v. United States
U.S. Case Law
249 U.S. 47 (1919), subverted the apparent absolute nature of First Amendment protections of freedom of speech by establishing a “clear and present danger” test by which certain forms of incendiary speech become prosecutable. The case involved two New York Socialists who were convicted under the Espionage Act of 1917 for distributing handbills urging resistance to military conscription during World War I.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/Schenck%20v.%20United%20States
It's about shutting up people you disagree with.
-
The trombones are tuning up for their Whomp-Whomp chorus, :rotf: .
-
I'm getting tired of having to repeat myself to the primitives, but anyway.....anything can happen.....and usually does.
-
Do you think the Red Commie primitive KC Fascist has any idea where that "clear and present danger" phrase originated?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/Schenck%20v.%20United%20States
It's about shutting up people you disagree with.
Is that the same case as the famous “fire in a crowded theater” (that they also don’t understand)?
-
And it will all end on Aquitmas Day.
-
And it will all end on Aquitmas Day.
If it doesn't end in acquittal, it will end with 'What the hell happens now"-mas, since the potential imprisonment of a former president would kind of put us in uncharted waters.
-
If it doesn't end in acquittal, it will end with 'What the hell happens now"-mas, since the potential imprisonment of a former president would kind of put us in uncharted waters.
It seems politician’s and the government in general is pushing the limits of their reach way beyond their constitutional limits.
Will we wind up a dictatorship or will there be a revolt of the people to restore our country?
-
And it will all end on Aquitmas Day.
Ha! Ha! "Aquitmas Day" ...
Love your choice of words, D.D. :clap: :clap: Clever clever!
:hi5: ~ ABC