The Conservative Cave

Current Events => Politics => Topic started by: thundley4 on September 08, 2008, 10:37:39 AM

Title: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: thundley4 on September 08, 2008, 10:37:39 AM
These a-holes (http://downspalin.blogspot.com/)  should  :censored: die in a fire.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: mamacags on September 08, 2008, 11:01:43 AM
You can flag the blog and get it taken down.  There is a Flag Blog button at the top right of the page.  What a total piece of crap. :bird:
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: miskie on September 08, 2008, 11:04:53 AM
I flagged it as hate against someone with disabilities. I normally just ignore stuff like this but setting up a fake Trig Palin blog crosses well over the line of free speech, satire and decency.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Wineslob on September 08, 2008, 12:43:43 PM
Flagged..............................assholes. :censored:
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: thundley4 on September 08, 2008, 01:16:36 PM
I didn't see the flagging optiong before. It's been used , but since google leans left, it probably won't matter.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Servonaut on September 08, 2008, 03:04:20 PM
Flagged  :censored:
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Airwolf on September 08, 2008, 04:18:38 PM
Flagged. You don't do this to a disabled child.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Hawkgirl on September 08, 2008, 04:32:45 PM
Wow...someone just inherited a big dose of karma...
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Baruch Menachem on September 08, 2008, 08:09:01 PM
These people are more compassionate, smarter, more moral, just plain better than me.


That's what they tell me anyway.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Manbearpig on September 08, 2008, 08:13:59 PM
I flagged it as well, and posted a comment on one of the more recent entries.  One asswipe was trying to say that it was merely satirizing the fact that Sarah's husband will primarily take care of the baby, and that we evil  neocon fundies are a bunch of morons being used by the corporate country club elites if we can't separate this immature blog from the rest of the shithead Obama supporters.  I told him that most Obama supporters ARE this petty and immature, and that it shows in his pathetic defense of this stupid little site.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Chris_ on September 08, 2008, 08:14:08 PM
This POS can only bring up one question:

What is his/her DU Name?

My friends, if you don't believe in real evil, look herein and see it.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on September 08, 2008, 10:52:44 PM
I wonder if it is one of Michael Crook's or Fred Phelps's blogs? We know they love to pick on the weak and are the scum of the Earth. They are both RATS.
 :bird: :bird:
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Chris on September 08, 2008, 11:40:39 PM
I tried to flag it as slander/libel, and this was the result.  I don't think any protest was recorded.

Quote
Defamation, Libel, and Slander
Google does not remove allegedly defamatory content from www.google.com or any other U.S. dot com domains.

US domain sites such as Google.com, Blogger, Page Creator, etc. are sites regulated only by U.S. law. Given this fact, and pursuant to Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act, we do not remove allegedly defamatory material from U.S. domains. The only exception to this rule is if the material has been found to be defamatory by a court, as evidenced by a court order.

The language of Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act fundamentally states that Internet services like Google.com, Blogger and many of Google's other services are republishers and not the publisher of that content. Therefore, these sites are not held liable for any allegedly defamatory, offensive or harassing content published on the site.

Please note that Blogger does not remove blogs for containing insults or negative commentary. While blogs that contain such content can be distasteful, Blogger is not in a position to arbitrate disputes.

You'll have to flag it as Hate.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Atomic Lib Smasher on September 09, 2008, 12:09:14 AM
I tried to flag it as slander/libel, and this was the result.  I don't think any protest was recorded.

Quote
Defamation, Libel, and Slander
Google does not remove allegedly defamatory content from www.google.com or any other U.S. dot com domains.

US domain sites such as Google.com, Blogger, Page Creator, etc. are sites regulated only by U.S. law. Given this fact, and pursuant to Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act, we do not remove allegedly defamatory material from U.S. domains. The only exception to this rule is if the material has been found to be defamatory by a court, as evidenced by a court order.

The language of Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act fundamentally states that Internet services like Google.com, Blogger and many of Google's other services are republishers and not the publisher of that content. Therefore, these sites are not held liable for any allegedly defamatory, offensive or harassing content published on the site.

Please note that Blogger does not remove blogs for containing insults or negative commentary. While blogs that contain such content can be distasteful, Blogger is not in a position to arbitrate disputes.

You'll have to flag it as Hate.

Hate would be it.

Quote
Blogger strongly believes in freedom of speech. We believe that having a variety of perspectives is an important part of what makes blogs such an exciting and diverse medium. With that said, there are certain types of content that are not allowed on Blogger. While Blogger values and safeguards political and social commentary, material that promotes hatred toward groups based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status, or sexual orientation/gender identity is not allowed on Blogger.

Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Airwolf on September 09, 2008, 06:07:46 PM
I tried to flag it as slander/libel, and this was the result.  I don't think any protest was recorded.

Quote
Defamation, Libel, and Slander
Google does not remove allegedly defamatory content from www.google.com or any other U.S. dot com domains.

US domain sites such as Google.com, Blogger, Page Creator, etc. are sites regulated only by U.S. law. Given this fact, and pursuant to Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act, we do not remove allegedly defamatory material from U.S. domains. The only exception to this rule is if the material has been found to be defamatory by a court, as evidenced by a court order.

The language of Section 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act fundamentally states that Internet services like Google.com, Blogger and many of Google's other services are republishers and not the publisher of that content. Therefore, these sites are not held liable for any allegedly defamatory, offensive or harassing content published on the site.

Please note that Blogger does not remove blogs for containing insults or negative commentary. While blogs that contain such content can be distasteful, Blogger is not in a position to arbitrate disputes.

You'll have to flag it as Hate.

That's what i did and if thats as close as i can get then so be it because it is hate as well. The childs defenseless and if anyone had said the same about Barrys kids they would be feeling the same kind of scorn. 
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on September 09, 2008, 07:28:36 PM
Normally, I would ignore, but it is just plain wrong, so I flagged it.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Sadie on September 09, 2008, 09:49:06 PM
Senseless and sad that they have stooped so low. the child shown on this blog has the worst of all scenarios when it comes to Downs. There are levels of Downs and this child has it all with a cleft pallet and probably limited mental capacities. I wonder how Obama would like for his children to be displayed this way?
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Atomic Lib Smasher on September 09, 2008, 10:52:07 PM
Senseless and sad that they have stooped so low. the child shown on this blog has the worst of all scenarios when it comes to Downs. There are levels of Downs and this child has it all with a cleft pallet and probably limited mental capacities. I wonder how Obama would like for his children to be displayed this way?

Nobody's (even on the most extreme right) has talked about Obama's kids in any way.. except Obama who said "I don't want them punished with a baby". Sick ****s, all of them.

Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: jinxmchue on September 10, 2008, 06:40:35 PM
Flagged. You don't do this to a disabled child.

You do if you're a liberal, apparently.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on September 10, 2008, 08:21:32 PM

You do if you're a liberal, apparently.

Oh yeah. Michael Crook, the troop bashing, America hating, Fred Phelps loving freak does that all the time.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on January 03, 2009, 08:47:49 PM
Sorry to bump this, but this vile site is still there.  :bird:
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Atomic Lib Smasher on January 04, 2009, 12:48:58 AM
Sorry to bump this, but this vile site is still there.  :bird:

I flagged it again, Ptarmy. Ya think the asshole would be happy his socialist won, but I think mommy took the laptop away from the puke and grounded him from it.

Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: JohnnyReb on January 04, 2009, 11:13:19 AM
Only way to get it taken down is to have the CHinese government complain. ....or Muslims.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Chris_ on January 04, 2009, 11:20:38 AM
Flagged  :censored:
Me too.  But like someone pointed out upthread, Google is lefty so they won't care.

Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on January 04, 2009, 05:34:27 PM
I flagged it again, Ptarmy. Ya think the ******* would be happy his socialist won, but I think mommy took the laptop away from the puke and grounded him from it.



Whoever wrote is a big time loser.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Chris on January 04, 2009, 05:36:18 PM
Whoever wrote is a big time loser.

I think blogger.com is a bigger problem for not taking down a site like that.  I flagged it as 'hate', but they will probably overlook it as well.

I imagine if someone had dug up similar, unattrative pictures of the Obama children and posted them in the same manner, the site would be gone faster than it would take to hit F5.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on January 04, 2009, 05:39:01 PM
I think blogger.com is a bigger problem for not taking down a site like that.  I flagged it as 'hate', but they will probably overlook it as well.

I imagine if someone had dug up similar, unattrative pictures of the Obama children and posted them in the same manner, the site would be gone faster than it would take to hit F5.

I bet the blogger is either Michael Crook or Fred Phelps or his children or grand children. They hate Sarah Palin with a passion.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Chris on January 04, 2009, 05:48:33 PM
I bet the blogger is either Michael Crook or Fred Phelps or his children or grand children. They hate Sarah Palin with a passion.

There are plenty of assholes in this world.  I wouldn't give either of those idiots credit for doing more than cleaning their backsides.
Title: Re: Sick ****** a**holes
Post by: Ptarmigan on January 04, 2009, 05:54:39 PM
There are plenty of assholes in this world.  I wouldn't give either of those idiots credit for doing more than cleaning their backsides.

Oh yeah. Those people I mentioned are the worst kind and epitomy of ******* extrordinaire.