The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: MrsSmith on September 06, 2008, 08:15:02 PM

Title: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: MrsSmith on September 06, 2008, 08:15:02 PM
Quote
DCBob  (441 posts)      Sat Sep-06-08 08:58 PM
Original message (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6967864)
 
Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves

 Advertisements [?]

Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska and John McCain's vice presidential pick, is an enthusiastic hunter who has proposed legislation and cash incentives to encourage aerial wolf gunning, the controversial practice of shooting wolves from an aircraft.

http://www.slate.com/id/2199140 /
====

This issue will make a great ad. Most normal human beings will not look favorably on this.
 

Quote
mtnsnake  (1000+ posts)      Sat Sep-06-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a ****ing asshole. Someone should drop her and Cheney onto an iceburg with hungry polar bears
 and without any high powered weapons to protect their cowardly asses
.

===============

az chela  (1000+ posts)      Sat Sep-06-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have signed a ton of 
 petitions against this killing of the wolves.This broad is a sadistic bitch


=============================================

 
 BrklynLiberal  (1000+ posts)       Sat Sep-06-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have also signed petitions..and I agree with your assessment of her and what she is.

I don't know where mtnsnake lives, but DCBob, az chela, and BrklynLiberal are, I'm sure, quite familiar with the problems people might have living around wolf packs...NOT!!   :lmao:  Don't let that ignorance bother any of you lurking DUmmies, though...maybe you can all make a trip to Alaska in a couple months, right after the election, and spend some time communing with wolves.  I'm sure you'll totally enjoy it.  And the wolves will be happy, too...nice, soft, fat meat.   :rotf:
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: Baruch Menachem on September 06, 2008, 08:20:23 PM
PETA would forbid that.  We can't have the poor wolves poisoned. :bawl:
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: MrsSmith on September 06, 2008, 08:28:08 PM
PETA would forbid that.  We can't have the poor wolves poisoned. :bawl:

 :thatsright:  Oh, man, I didn't even think of that.  The cholesterol level would be horrible. 



 :rotf:
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: tuolumnejim on September 06, 2008, 08:40:45 PM

I don't know where mtnsnake lives, but DCBob, az chela, and BrklynLiberal are, I'm sure, quite familiar with the problems people might have living around wolf packs...NOT!!   :lmao:  Don't let that ignorance bother any of you lurking DUmmies, though...maybe you can all make a trip to Alaska in a couple months, right after the election, and spend some time communing with wolves.  I'm sure you'll totally enjoy it.  And the wolves will be happy, too...nice, soft, fat meat.   :rotf:


mtnsnakes profile lists "Northern Adirondacks NY State".
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: MrsSmith on September 06, 2008, 08:51:24 PM

I don't know where mtnsnake lives, but DCBob, az chela, and BrklynLiberal are, I'm sure, quite familiar with the problems people might have living around wolf packs...NOT!!   :lmao:  Don't let that ignorance bother any of you lurking DUmmies, though...maybe you can all make a trip to Alaska in a couple months, right after the election, and spend some time communing with wolves.  I'm sure you'll totally enjoy it.  And the wolves will be happy, too...nice, soft, fat meat.   :rotf:


mtnsnakes profile lists "Northern Adirondacks NY State".
Adirondack Wolves (http://www.gobacktothebasics.com/information_and_stories_on_the_adirondack_wolf.htm)

It appears that mtnsnakes has no clue, either.  Why am I not surprised?   ::)
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: Airwolf on September 06, 2008, 09:08:06 PM
Well as easy as it may seem to some people .Shooting at a moving target while flying in an airplane isn't that easy. Especially when its as small as the end of your front sight from your point of view.
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: thundley4 on September 06, 2008, 09:16:47 PM
Where were these dummies when Australia culled the kangaroo population using aerial hunting.  Maybe Alaska should live trap the wolves and transport any with rabies or other diseases to where the DUmmies live.
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: GOBUCKS on September 06, 2008, 09:43:43 PM
It is all part of a Rovian plot, a dress rehearsal for when the same method is introduced for controlling moonbats. Aerial control will begin as soon as they are sufficiently calmed by the current chemtrail program.
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: AllosaursRus on September 07, 2008, 01:00:38 AM
Quote
BrklynLiberal  (1000+ posts)       Sat Sep-06-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have also signed petitions..and I agree with your assessment of her and what she is.

I don't know where mtnsnake lives, but DCBob, az chela, and BrklynLiberal are, I'm sure, quite familiar with the problems people might have living around wolf packs...NOT!!   :lmao:  Don't let that ignorance bother any of you lurking DUmmies, though...maybe you can all make a trip to Alaska in a couple months, right after the election, and spend some time communing with wolves.  I'm sure you'll totally enjoy it.  And the wolves will be happy, too...nice, soft, fat meat.   :rotf:

Maybe this stupid asshole should GOOGLE wolf attacks in the last coupla' years! We have had several kids attacked here in North Idaho from their re-infestation they call re-population!

Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: dandi on September 07, 2008, 01:13:33 AM
PETA would forbid that.  We can't have the poor wolves poisoned. :bawl:

 :thatsright:  Oh, man, I didn't even think of that.  The cholesterol level would be horrible. 



 :rotf:

Not to mention all the cannabis metabolites stored up in their fat.

After eating all the wolves would be laid back, slack-jawed and wearing sunglasses, saying, "Man, that was some heavy shit!" :II:
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: AllosaursRus on September 07, 2008, 01:23:07 AM
PETA would forbid that.  We can't have the poor wolves poisoned. :bawl:

 :thatsright:  Oh, man, I didn't even think of that.  The cholesterol level would be horrible. 



 :rotf:

Not to mention all the cannabis metabolites stored up in their fat.

After eating all the wolves would be laid back, slack-jawed and wearing sunglasses, saying, "Man, that was some heavy shit!" :II:
heh, H5
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: BlueStateSaint on September 07, 2008, 05:48:01 AM

I don't know where mtnsnake lives, but DCBob, az chela, and BrklynLiberal are, I'm sure, quite familiar with the problems people might have living around wolf packs...NOT!!   :lmao:  Don't let that ignorance bother any of you lurking DUmmies, though...maybe you can all make a trip to Alaska in a couple months, right after the election, and spend some time communing with wolves.  I'm sure you'll totally enjoy it.  And the wolves will be happy, too...nice, soft, fat meat.   :rotf:


mtnsnakes profile lists "Northern Adirondacks NY State".
Adirondack Wolves (http://www.gobacktothebasics.com/information_and_stories_on_the_adirondack_wolf.htm)

It appears that mtnsnakes has no clue, either.  Why am I not surprised?   ::)

The DUmmy mtnsnakes is an idiot.  I deer hunt in the Adirondacks.  The coyotes there are pretty big, but there's canines roaming up there that are bigger than 45 pounds (what a big Eastern Coyote weighs).  (There's also the stray mountain lion/puma/cougar, but that's another story.)

Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: JohnnyReb on September 07, 2008, 06:23:29 AM
Yep, the "enviromentalist". They raise cane trying to perserve wildlife. All the while ignoring the dangers/trouble and cost of said wildlife that they live hundreds to thousands of miles away from. It is, after all, not their kids, livestock and pets that are in danger.

They're usually the ones that rant and rave against the use of pesticides, especially if they aren't the ones going to be bothered with fireants and killer bee's etc..

They like to preach conservation of energy too. But then drive 2-300 miles to spend every weekend in the mountians or at the coast communing with nature. ....then they leave home with the heating/airconditioning running full blast and all the lights on so their condo will be secure and just the right temperture when they get back home.

...and then they say, "We all have to do our part." You better believe me, it's you and I that have to "DO". It's enough on their part that they mearly said, "We all have to do our part."
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: BlueStateSaint on September 07, 2008, 06:26:43 AM
Yep, the "enviromentalist". They raise cane trying to perserve wildlife. All the while ignoring the dangers/trouble and cost of said wildlife that they live hundreds to thousands of miles away from. It is, after all, not their kids, livestock and pets that are in danger.

They're usually the ones that rant and rave against the use of pesticides, especially if they aren't the ones going to be bothered with fireants and killer bee's etc..

They like to preach conservation of energy too. But then drive 2-300 miles to spend every weekend in the mountians or at the coast communing with nature. ....then they leave home with the heating/airconditioning running full blast and all the lights on so their condo will be secure and just the right temperture when they get back home.

...and then they say, "We all have to do our part." You better believe me, it's you and I that have to "DO". It's enough on their part that they mearly said, "We all have to do our part."

I believe it can be summed up in this line . . . "Do as I say, not as I do."
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: ScubaGuy on September 07, 2008, 08:03:53 AM
Could you imagine the DUmmies living in the age of dinosaurs?

Sign the petition to save T-Rex and the velociraptors!  :lmao:
Title: Re: Shotgun Sarah rewards aerial slaughter of wolves
Post by: AllosaursRus on September 07, 2008, 11:31:42 AM
Quote
They like to preach conservation of energy too. But then drive 2-300 miles to spend every weekend in the mountians or at the coast communing with nature. ....then they leave home with the heating/airconditioning running full blast and all the lights on so their condo will be secure and just the right temperture when they get back home.
We get a few of the idiots up here, but usually after spending one winter, they go back where they belong.

If they last longer than that, they get converted to more upstanding individuals and turn to conservatism in order to stay alive!  :-)