The Conservative Cave
Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: CC27 on August 12, 2022, 01:49:50 PM
-
Saboburns (2,442 posts)
Breaking: Trump under investigation for breaking Espionage Act!
Breitbart reveals that the Former President is under investigation for violating the Espionage Act. 18 USC 793.
10 year penalties for each document.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217034557
Lucy cue up the football..
-
I see nothing on breit bart, the tweets the DUmp links to just show a picture of text saying the warrant lists three statutes, including 793, which apparently is the Espionage Act. Moonbats all falling all over themselves.
Do they really believe that if, by some miracle, all their machinations do keep Trump from running, they still stand any shot at retaining their power?
-
They’ll be on a high-high until it all comes crashing down underneath them. That’s the beauty of watching dimwits who rely on emotions instead of logic.
:popcorn:
.
-
They’ll be on a high-high until it all comes crashing down underneath them. That’s the beauty of watching dimwits who rely on emotions instead of logic.
:popcorn:
.
The higher they get, the further the fail.
-
So espionage-y that the Wall Street Journal already announced the itinerary before the 'official release'.
-
Unlike Toobin's time at CNN this will not have the happy ending the DUmmies are looking for.
-
Unlike Toobin's time at CNN this will not have the happy ending the DUmmies are looking for.
When, in the past 7 years of Hate-Trumpery has it ever?
If Lizzy goes down to defeat next week as abjectly as polls suggest, it should be very :popcorn: on DU.
-
When, in the past 7 years of Hate-Trumpery has it ever?
If Lizzy goes down to defeat next week as abjectly as polls suggest, it should be very :popcorn: on DU.
Really? I mean, I know they like people who lick the boot, but are they that invested in Cheney?
-
I'd really find it funny if while digging through all the documents they find a copy of one that declassifies all of it making the whole thing moot.
-
I'd really find it funny if while digging through all the documents they find a copy of one that declassifies all of it making the whole thing moot.
Given the Feebs known propensity for hiding exculpatory evidence, that would be about the worst imaginable place to stash such a document I could think of.
-
And another thing, if Trump is gone, most of the democrats' talking points go with him. How will they distract from their failures and their garbage leadership?
-
When, in the past 7 years of Hate-Trumpery has it ever?
Or indeed the decade plus of Hate-Bushery before that?
They allow themselves to be eaten from inside by their burning hatred - and it turns out to be rather amusing for the rest of us to watch.
-
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #6)Fri Aug 12, 2022, 02:51 PM
Saboburns (2,491 posts)
7. Not yet
See Trump leaked the warrant before the 3pm dead line. But only to his friendly sources.
I think what you mean to say is that President Trump released the warrant, you idiot.
-
DENVERPOPS (6,554 posts)
38. screw the ten years shit
In my mind, Treason at this level = Death. And the same with the countless "co-conspirators" who actively assisted him in trying to bring down the United States of America, and came within a hair on J6 of doing that exact thing..........
**** them all..........
Goodness gracious. Who pissed in his/her/thats Cheerios?
Lurking morons, If a few unarmed hooligans wearing make-up and plastic Viking Helmets, nearly did in the United States, then its time to beef up security. :p
-
Goodness gracious. Who pissed in his/her/thats Cheerios?
Lurking morons, If a few unarmed hooligans wearing make-up and plastic Viking Helmets, nearly did in the United States, then its time to beef up security. :p
Speaking of January 6th, any word on whether they're going to recommend charges? Interesting timing with the raid.
-
Saboburns (2,491 posts)
7. Not yet
See Trump leaked the warrant before the 3pm dead line. But only to his friendly sources.
By what authority can Trump releasing a search warrant be banned or restricted? And what legal and ethical motive is there for such a ban or restriction?