Star Member Wicked Blue (3,993 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216443454
Question: Why can't the UN send peacekeeping forces to Ukraine?
I tried to research this but am unable to find anything, not even a discussion of the possibility.
Is it because of the nuclear threat?
OneBlueDotS-Carolina (1,072 posts)
1. The Veto Twins
Russia & China on the security council.
Edited to add, during the Korean conflict, The US pushed the police action thru the security council, The USSR voted for it, as did China, but that China is now Taiwan.
Star Member Wicked Blue (3,993 posts)
5. Thank you
I hoped the General Assembly could override them, but that was wishful thinking
Star Member EarlG (19,237 posts)
2. Because UN peacekeeping forces require
a UN Security Council resolution to deploy.
Any of the five permanent members of the council can veto a resolution.
Russia is one of the five permanent members.
Star Member Hortensis (50,990 posts)
7. As said. They also don't keep a standing reserve and have
to build the military basically from scratch each time. I have no idea of their potential but am sure they've never operated on the scale that would be needed.
Total. Disconnect. From. Reality.
Once the fighting and danger is over, I'm sure the Blue Helmets would love to go to Ukraine and rape all the women they see. That is the one thing Blue Helmets are capable of doing but little else.
...
Once the fighting and danger is over, I'm sure the Blue Helmets would love to go to Ukraine and rape all the women they see. That is the one thing Blue Helmets are capable of doing but little else.
It's kind of telling that DUpipo are unaware of Blue Helmets' record of rape and sexual assault. Or maybe they do know and are fine with Blue Helmet rapists.To be fair, they are ok with their elected officials doing it too
To be fair, they are ok with their elected officials doing it too
Bill Clinton's helmet is blue just thinking about it.