The Conservative Cave

Current Events => The DUmpster => Topic started by: dutch508 on December 13, 2021, 09:19:19 AM

Title: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: dutch508 on December 13, 2021, 09:19:19 AM
Quote
Beachnutt (1,671 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216137155

Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?

Especially when our children just learning to read are seeing this and turn to their parent and ask " what does f__ck mean mom "
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/lewd

 ::)

Quote
cadoman (484 posts)

5. the important thing when pursuing that angle is consistency

It can be but if **** Trump flags were in the same area it'd be problematic to enforce. For instance, in my neighborhood there were--and still are--a lot of "**** Trump" flags, so it'd be kinda hard.  The best place to pursue this strategy would be a neighborhood that had no "**** Trump" flags but now has "**** Biden" flags. I would guess the suburbs would most often offer such opportunities.

Consider how we're able to do a Satanic altar at a statehouse, for example, it's only because the idiots allowed a nativity scene to be setup. So we're allowed to express our faith there in the same way.

Honestly though, I'd let them have their rage. It just shows they're upset and powerless. If we went after the flags it'd just get them more energized.

Quote
Star Member samplegirl (8,723 posts)

8. We have these unsightly flags

On the way to our grocery store and where our children ride pass on the bus each day.
(https://i.postimg.cc/j5yKLwG1/5-DE30885-1044-4384-A410-D82-F50-FCAF9-D.jpg)

Quote
Effete Snob (1,501 posts)

9. No

It never ceases to amaze me how freedom of speech gets so little real support.

There is nothing in the First Amendment about having to explain anything to children.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohen_v._California

Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "**** the Draft" in the public corridors of a California courthouse.

The Court ultimately found that displaying a mere four-letter word was not sufficient justification to allow states to restrict free speech and that free speech can be restricted only under severe circumstances beyond offensiveness. The ruling set a precedent used in future cases concerning the power of states to regulate free speech in order to maintain public civility.

How does the Constitution distinguish between "**** the draft" and "**** Joe Biden" in any way that does not depend on the political orientation or point of view of the person reading it?

What do you want to do to these people to compel their obedience? Lock them up? Fine them? Seize their property? Be specific.

Lastly, you mention "our laws against public lewdness" but you don't mention in what state this is happening or quote any such law. If you would like to identify your state, I'd be happy to look up whatever relevant law you might have and post it.

 :lol:

Quote
Star Member brooklynite (74,391 posts)

12. Name ANY location that has "time and place" limits on electioneering.

That's a flagrant First Amendment violation. The only restrictions that exist are with respect to proximity to a polling place.

nb: Under your theory, any Biden/Harris bumper sticker or sign would also be illegal.

Quote
mahatmakanejeeves (40,991 posts)

14. Alexandria, Virginia. I need to elaborate.

You are allowed to post political signs in a public right of way starting no earlier than 45 days before an election. The signs have to come down on a timely basis too.

I can dig up the municipal code, but I think that's a common practice.

Your own yard? That's your business. I think that's what you're talking about.

Quote
Star Member PatSeg (40,148 posts)

13. My twin grandsons

started reading very young, so I am particularly outraged when people post signs or flags with obscenities on them. Once again, right-wingers show they have no consideration for anyone except themselves, but they are quick to be offended by other people's words and actions.

It seems like it was only yesterday that the republican party was the party of family values and righteous indignation.

 ::)

Quote
Star Member Chin music (14,296 posts)

20. I'm sorry but,I don't recall ever seeing a **** trmp flag.

Like ever. Jus say'in.

 :thatsright:

Quote
Star Member MissMillie (33,657 posts)

19. The flag you mention, as well as the confederate flag, and swastikas...

while vile and disgusting...

show us exactly who we're dealing with.


I think I once heard Roy Wood Jr. say that if he needed to buy gas late at night, a confederate flag at a particular gas station was a sign to him to look for a different gas station.

The racist in the hood is easier to identify than the one who doesn't wear one.

 :yawn:
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: SVPete on December 13, 2021, 09:24:44 AM
No, not any more so than Proggies' F___ Trump, F___ Bush, F___ Fill in the Name signs and bumperstickers.
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: ADsOutburst on December 13, 2021, 09:50:29 AM
Quote
20. I'm sorry but,I don't recall ever seeing a **** trmp flag.

Like ever. Jus say'in.

"What does 'Truck Fump' mean, mom?"
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: DLR Pyro on December 13, 2021, 09:59:21 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zNr8Pf1QkY (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zNr8Pf1QkY)
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: franksolich on December 13, 2021, 10:09:41 AM
Well now, here's a fine kettle of fish.

The political party, the political ideology, that for decades has popularized vulgarity and coarseness in public expression, suddenly complaining about this?
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: 67 Rover on December 13, 2021, 11:24:09 AM
F - 46
J - 4a
B - 42
(Hex)

F – 01000110
J – 01001010
B – 01000010
Binary
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: FaC on December 13, 2021, 11:30:24 AM
F - 46
J - 4a
B - 42
(Hex)

F – 01000110
J – 01001010
B – 01000010
Binary
Hmm. I wonder if Titleist understands hex? Maybe we can get them to put that on golf balls??  :whistling:
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: SVPete on December 13, 2021, 11:49:29 AM
Quote
Star Moron-Liar Chin music (14,296 posts)

20. I'm sorry but,I don't recall ever seeing a **** trmp flag.

Like ever. Jus say'in.


(https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/gkQAAOSw1zVfVH~j/s-l300.jpg)
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: USA4ME on December 13, 2021, 04:06:20 PM
When Slick Willy and Monica were degrading the Oval Office, we were told by Dems what they did had nothing to do with the functioning of gov’t and to mind our own business.

Therefore primitives, this has nothing to do with the functioning of gov’t. Mind your own business.

.
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: enslaved1 on December 13, 2021, 04:24:08 PM
Quote
Beachnutt (1,671 posts)
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216137155

Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?

Talk public lewdness to the next pride parade you see.  I'm not a fan of f**k anything on flags, tshirts, bumper stickers, ect, but it's a fact of life under the 1st amendment.  Even if I agree with the sentiment, unlike you moonbat hypocrites who only complain if it's your guy/gal/tranny/idea/party getting told off. 

BTW lurkers, and Chin music Put this in your pipe and smoke it (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/girls-trump-tshirts-rally/)

and this (https://www.thedailybeast.com/man-wearing-fck-trump-t-shirt-kicked-out-of-texas-restaurant/)

and one more for good measure (https://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/****-trump/)

edited cause I found some more
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: DLR Pyro on December 13, 2021, 04:31:37 PM
Talk public lewdness to the next pride parade you see. 

:cheersmate:
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: SVPete on December 13, 2021, 06:43:48 PM
Talk public lewdness to the next pride parade you see ride or march in.  ...

Improved accuracy, :-) .
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: Movie buff- The Sequel on December 14, 2021, 04:58:18 AM
Well now, here's a fine kettle of fish.

The political party, the political ideology, that for decades has popularized vulgarity and coarseness in public expression, suddenly complaining about this?
Beat me to it!
The Left loves cheering on all manner of public vulgarity and obscenity, ESPECIALLY in the presence of children, then accuse anyone who opposes this of being "Prudes" and "Killjoys."
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: thundley4 on December 14, 2021, 05:53:23 AM
DUmmie admits Democrats are evil.
Quote
Consider how we're able to do a Satanic altar at a statehouse, for example, it's only because the idiots allowed a nativity scene to be setup. So we're allowed to express our faith there in the same way.
Title: Re: Would the F___k Biden flags not fall under our laws against public lewdness?
Post by: Delmar on December 14, 2021, 09:18:55 PM
Just a few years ago, a rodeo clown got run out of town on a rail simply for wearing an Obama mask.  Now F___ Biden and Let's go Brandon signs are popping up everywhere and not a thing can be done about it.  Just goes to show you how massively unpopular this doddering old fool is.